Hmmm I could see how that’s maybe a defence for breaking and entering in this case, not sure it’s adequate defence for attacking a policewoman with a sledgehammer. Sets a dangerous precedent.
Who would be a police officer
Has anyone read enough to know if they were charged and found not guilty for that
You'd expect it for that one at least.‘The jury at Woolwich Crown Court had been deliberating for more than 36 hours after a trial that began in November 2025.
Rajwani, Rogers and Devlin were found not guilty of violent disorder. No verdict was reached for charges of violent disorder for Head, Corner and Kamio.
Corner was accused of causing grievous bodily harm with intent by striking police sergeant Kate Evans in her back with a sledgehammer. The jury was unable to reach a verdict on this charge.’
Now depends if CPS go for retrial I guess
Unfortunately, we now live in a world where rules and laws seem to matter less and less.
Thanks‘The jury at Woolwich Crown Court had been deliberating for more than 36 hours after a trial that began in November 2025.
Rajwani, Rogers and Devlin were found not guilty of violent disorder. No verdict was reached for charges of violent disorder for Head, Corner and Kamio.
Corner was accused of causing grievous bodily harm with intent by striking police sergeant Kate Evans in her back with a sledgehammer. The jury was unable to reach a verdict on this charge.’
Now depends if CPS go for retrial I guess
The bodycam footage from the security guards is just bizarre. Why are they armed with whips and sledgehammers?I saw some video footage which I hadn’t seen prior to posting (had only read Dave’s article). Doesn’t look good. Then you hear the coppers injuries. You can’t be doing stuff like that
Because they can.The bodycam footage from the security guards is just bizarre. Why are they armed with whips and sledgehammers?
I wouldn't of thought security guards should be armed at all but why are they patrolling the building with them and then attacking people?Because they can.
I wouldn't of thought security guards should be armed at all but why are they patrolling the building with them and then attacking people?
I wouldn't of thought security guards should be armed at all but why are they patrolling the building with them and then attacking people?
Just caught a bit on the news this morning that said they'd released bodycam footage that showed the security guards using whips on the people that broke inInteresting that's your take from it, security guards fault.Wasn't it the protestors with the whips who were the "black team"?
That police woman in Manchester headbutting that guys fist as well, the bitch.
Just caught a bit on the news this morning that said they'd released bodycam footage that showed the security guards using whips on the people that broke in
At no point have I suggested anything was the security guards fault, just thought it was a bit odd they had whips and sledgehammers but if thats been incorrectly reported then that would explain it.
Just caught a bit on the news this morning that said they'd released bodycam footage that showed the security guards using whips on the people that broke in
At no point have I suggested anything was the security guards fault, just thought it was a bit odd they had whips and sledgehammers but if thats been incorrectly reported then that would explain it.
Why wouldn't he, there's been nothing reported in MSM about it the whole sorry event just sanitized crap.You are just believing shit on the internet like the Amsterdam Tel Viv thing aren’t you?