Has anyone read enough to know if they were charged and found not guilty for thatHmmm I could see how that’s maybe a defence for breaking and entering in this case, not sure it’s adequate defence for attacking a policewoman with a sledgehammer. Sets a dangerous precedent.
Who would be a police officer
Has anyone read enough to know if they were charged and found not guilty for that
You'd expect it for that one at least.‘The jury at Woolwich Crown Court had been deliberating for more than 36 hours after a trial that began in November 2025.
Rajwani, Rogers and Devlin were found not guilty of violent disorder. No verdict was reached for charges of violent disorder for Head, Corner and Kamio.
Corner was accused of causing grievous bodily harm with intent by striking police sergeant Kate Evans in her back with a sledgehammer. The jury was unable to reach a verdict on this charge.’
Now depends if CPS go for retrial I guess
Unfortunately, we now live in a world where rules and laws seem to matter less and less.
Thanks‘The jury at Woolwich Crown Court had been deliberating for more than 36 hours after a trial that began in November 2025.
Rajwani, Rogers and Devlin were found not guilty of violent disorder. No verdict was reached for charges of violent disorder for Head, Corner and Kamio.
Corner was accused of causing grievous bodily harm with intent by striking police sergeant Kate Evans in her back with a sledgehammer. The jury was unable to reach a verdict on this charge.’
Now depends if CPS go for retrial I guess
The bodycam footage from the security guards is just bizarre. Why are they armed with whips and sledgehammers?I saw some video footage which I hadn’t seen prior to posting (had only read Dave’s article). Doesn’t look good. Then you hear the coppers injuries. You can’t be doing stuff like that
Because they can.The bodycam footage from the security guards is just bizarre. Why are they armed with whips and sledgehammers?
I wouldn't of thought security guards should be armed at all but why are they patrolling the building with them and then attacking people?Because they can.
I wouldn't of thought security guards should be armed at all but why are they patrolling the building with them and then attacking people?
I wouldn't of thought security guards should be armed at all but why are they patrolling the building with them and then attacking people?
Just caught a bit on the news this morning that said they'd released bodycam footage that showed the security guards using whips on the people that broke inInteresting that's your take from it, security guards fault.Wasn't it the protestors with the whips who were the "black team"?
That police woman in Manchester headbutting that guys fist as well, the bitch.
Just caught a bit on the news this morning that said they'd released bodycam footage that showed the security guards using whips on the people that broke in
At no point have I suggested anything was the security guards fault, just thought it was a bit odd they had whips and sledgehammers but if thats been incorrectly reported then that would explain it.
Just caught a bit on the news this morning that said they'd released bodycam footage that showed the security guards using whips on the people that broke in
At no point have I suggested anything was the security guards fault, just thought it was a bit odd they had whips and sledgehammers but if thats been incorrectly reported then that would explain it.
Why wouldn't he, there's been nothing reported in MSM about it the whole sorry event just sanitized crap.You are just believing shit on the internet like the Amsterdam Tel Viv thing aren’t you?
The High Court has ruled that the ban of Palestine Action under terrorism legislation is unlawful - but it remains in place for now.
In a massive blow to the Home Office, three senior judges said that while Palestine Action use criminality to promote its aims its activities had not crossed the very high bar to make it a terrorist organisation.
The judges however ruled the ban must remain in place until a further hearing later in February as to what should happen next - including the possibility of a government appeal.
The decision means that while the group has successfully challenged the ban, expressing support for Palestine Action or taking part in its activities remains a serious criminal offence.
He wants that to happen so the rapture will happen. Genuinely not joking.
There's no way they got there within 2 minutes unless they then stood there and let him finish. Which you wouldn't put past the Met.I think the big thing I take from that is that police can respond within two minutes to someone doing a bit of graffiti.
America firstIt seems like this new war on Iran is going to be bloody for all sides
At least Iran’s regime ‘deserves it’ eh
It’s so uncontroversial as to be facile. Saddam “deserved it” too.The regime does. They murdered upto 30k of their citizens in the matter of days for protesting. I don’t see that as particularly controversial
It’s not about regime change, it’s about acquiring territory. About 5% of Americans support what they’re doing, and it’s all being done on Israel’s behalf, not even the naked oil grab that Venezuela and Iraq were.The regime does. They murdered upto 30k of their citizens in the matter of days for protesting. I don’t see that as particularly controversial
Does anyone want a war, of course not and I personally think we should steer well clear. The bigger issue with anything like this though is what happens to the citizens and what comes next. let’s hope it’s not the usual post war shambles we’ve seen elsewhere in the Middle East
It’s not about regime change, it’s about acquiring territory. About 5% of Americans support what they’re doing, and it’s all being done on Israel’s behalf, not even the naked oil grab that Venezuela and Iraq were.
You’re just being extremely naive if you think this is about punishing the baddies. Israel are guilty of even worse.
Both of them are absolutely abhorrent.It’s not about regime change, it’s about acquiring territory. About 5% of Americans support what they’re doing, and it’s all being done on Israel’s behalf, not even the naked oil grab that Venezuela and Iraq were.
You’re just being extremely naive if you think this is about punishing the baddies. Israel are guilty of even worse.
This isn’t even what’s best for him, it’s what’s best for Israel. The deal was apparently that Israel would kick things off, and provoke an Iranian response on US targets in the region to garner more ‘support’ for a war.As you might recall I said on the other thread that I thought Trump will do what’s best for Trump first and America second.
Don’t worry, I’m sure he’s already done some kind of deal somewhere that’s he’ll benefit from personally.This isn’t even what’s best for him, it’s what’s best for Israel. The deal was apparently that Israel would kick things off, and provoke an Iranian response on US targets in the region to garner more ‘support’ for a war.
There are no ‘good guys’ in that part of the world, Jordan are perhaps the ‘least bad’. Also of note to be welcoming literal jihadists in charge of Syria.Both of them are absolutely abhorrent.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?