Black6Osprey
New Member
To be fair I never had a problem with Adams or Dowie and both IMO would do better than the 3 mentioned. Reid wasn't here long enough and wasn't given the funds he wanted but Boothroyd was struggling.
Ince, Robins or Shaw (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter Diehard Si
- Start date
To be fair I never had a problem with Adams or Dowie and both IMO would do better than the 3 mentioned. Reid wasn't here long enough and wasn't given the funds he wanted but Boothroyd was struggling.
dongonzalos
Well-Known Member
I think he has to, if the players get wind he is not in the running. They have nothing to prove to him.
Not that they are trying to prove anything anyway it seems.
Robins for me from those options
S
SkyBlue Baker96
Guest
Here's a scenario, if we were to win tomorrow night, and very convincing say 3-0 could this change who gets the managers job? Or just delay the announcement because he might get another chance on Saturday?
CovLis86
Well-Known Member
Robins tactically, or Ince for respect. Tough call, neither are glorious options in my eyes. Hope whichever may get appointed they prove me wrong. If Shaw gets it, the board have literally been taking the piss out of us for 3 weeks, and for the remainder of the season.
Otis
Well-Known Member
And Ince by all accounts has always wanted to be backed financially by boards. Robins has always worked on a very small budget.
covcity4life
Well-Known Member
gotta be ince imo
we need the guvnor to scare the players and he did well at macclesfield and mk dons iirc
robins may just be used to medicority and we really need to shed that
money could be a hero or flop,no idea
we need the guvnor to scare the players and he did well at macclesfield and mk dons iirc
robins may just be used to medicority and we really need to shed that
money could be a hero or flop,no idea
What is your problem with Robins??
He is absolutely my choice,for a start he has never failed.
He stuck with Rotherham through TWO points deductions and left them top of the league when he was poached by Barnsley.
Get a grip man!
torchomatic
Well-Known Member
I think it has to be Robins.
skyblueman
New Member
Can't be Shaw - he's only on the list cos he's still got to be around once the new manager is in - obviously we won't get it
So it's between Robins & Ince going on this
It will be Robins....
Hugh Jarse
Well-Known Member
NOt Paul Ince, NOT Paul Ince, NOT Paul Ince.
I feel better now.
I feel better now.
It would have made sense to employ Mark Robins last time we were interested...
This.
I think we would still be in the Championship.
Black6Osprey
New Member
I can see it now "Coventry is one of the biggest brands in football" and "Our new manager is Mark Robins".
Two ridiculous statements in a week. My cup overflows.
It might put an extra 10 on the gate. Has he got a big family?
Two ridiculous statements in a week. My cup overflows.
It might put an extra 10 on the gate. Has he got a big family?
Last edited:
Why you knocking the fella? He is probably ideal for our circumsatances. Plus he was a striker so hopefully help in the final 3rd.
ricohroar
Well-Known Member
Stats incase your interested: By the way its Money not Shaw, telegraph typo they can't cope with two people called Richard.
Ince
Macclesfield managed 35 games 40% win
MK Dons 1st managed 55 games 60% win
Blackburn managed 26 games 28.64% win
MK Dons 2nd managed 56 games 41% win
Notts Co'ty managed 29 games 34.5% win
total win average 43.4%
Robbins
Rotherham managed 128 games 43% win
Barnsly managed 92 games 31.5% win
total 38.18% win average
Money
Scunthorpe managed 70 games 32.9% win
AIK managed 37 games 43.2% win
Vasteras managed 24 games 41.7% win
Newcastle Jets managed 23 games 39% win
Walsall managed 103 games 42.9% win
Luton managed 83 games 54% win
total 43% win average
Ince
Macclesfield managed 35 games 40% win
MK Dons 1st managed 55 games 60% win
Blackburn managed 26 games 28.64% win
MK Dons 2nd managed 56 games 41% win
Notts Co'ty managed 29 games 34.5% win
total win average 43.4%
Robbins
Rotherham managed 128 games 43% win
Barnsly managed 92 games 31.5% win
total 38.18% win average
Money
Scunthorpe managed 70 games 32.9% win
AIK managed 37 games 43.2% win
Vasteras managed 24 games 41.7% win
Newcastle Jets managed 23 games 39% win
Walsall managed 103 games 42.9% win
Luton managed 83 games 54% win
total 43% win average
dongonzalos
Well-Known Member
I think that is what sisu wished had happened already. Hence them dragging their feet.
What someone says in an interview is not as important as what they have actually done in the past, in our situation.
All this emphasis by tim and his wag over the managers interviewed all saying that the squad can be promoted. Is anyone who wants to get the job really going to say anything else!.
I can't understand why we need a second round of interviews what more can a person say!.
Black6Osprey
New Member
What avoiding relegation? Yes in that case you might be right.
If it wasn't for the points deduction he had, he would have got them (Rotherham) promoted on a shoe string budget. Good enough for me
Sky Blues
Active Member
Can't remember anyone hating Money (though I have probably just missed something), but if it is Ince, Shaw or Robins then it looks like each of them has someone on this forum ready to start the "get them out" bandwagon rolling... I hope, whoever is selected, we give them a decent chance to sort this team out.
sky blue john
Well-Known Member
Maybe if they were going for a job stacking shelves in the local co-op one interview would be enough :facepalm:
sky blue john
Well-Known Member
Going on Sisu's previous negotiating tactics it wouldn't surprise me whoever is offered the job doesn't accept it.
I don't hate Money (who does?) I feel it's about time we started pulling away from the old boys network and got someone in to take a fresh look at the club with a professional eye rather than a romantic one.we need an overhaul from top to bottom!
