This is correct. New clubs at non-league step 7 minimum and reformed clubs at non-league step 5 (Midland Alliance) minimum. However, this would cause all sorts of issues as the grounds at that level are not built for a fan base of our size and very rarely, if ever, have a police presence. Clubs at that level on occasion have attendances in single figures. Attendances in 3 figures are few and far between. Chances are that a reformed club would be in the conference for safety reasons.
Thank's for helping to highlight the very serious reality of the situation! It's the constitution though, we would have
zero choice but to comply, or not bother with having a club at all. They made these regulations to stop the likes of us, Nuneaton and Chester (can't believe I'm writing
that sentence..) from gaining too much of an advantage from being a huge club at that level and bouncing back in just a few years after financial mismanagement. This is a
serious deterrent. But it doesn't hurt the long-departed previous owners that cause it-just the fans that are left to try and build something from the ashes.
This is a cracking little read for those who haven't found it themselves via Google:
http://www.footballeconomy.com/content/phoenix-clubs-face-tougher-climate
I love the snarky Leamington post-code comment, too! CV31=Oxford,
apparently...not the last time I went South of the river, it didn't!