Whilst I do not necessarily disagree, but could an argument not be made that the referee's failure to send off Hirst gave Ipswich the advantage, instead of giving us the advantage we should have had were the rules applied consistently?
As I keep saying, the referee set the standard, at the request of Ipswich players, who appealed for Eccles to be booked, that he would book players who kicked the ball away. Expectation of the referee applying the rules consistently was broken, and this clearly has a mental impact.
And yes players are professionals but they are also humans and it's surely no coincidence that the game shifted after that moment, along with yet another wrong decision that directly lead to their opener.