So what happens if the charity are found at fault? Would SISU make them pay it all or come to some "agreement"?
SISU would claim every penny they possibly could. They batter people in court.
Which I am sure will be exposed in court and they will lose incurring costs.
If they win they are correct to have taken the action.
Fail to see a problem.
So what you're saying here is that you fail to see a problem with SISU suing the charity. You either think it's right or it's wrong and it looks like you think it's right so I'm assuming you support it
The charity initiated the proceedings
So what you're saying here is that you fail to see a problem with SISU suing the charity. You either think it's right or it's wrong and it looks like you think it's right so I'm assuming you support it
You think the counterclaim is moraly right G? Wanna put an opinion out there or just be a smug twat?
It's neither wrong nor right, it's the way things work. If you feel a charity has wronged you can you not pursue it through the courts? (that isn't me supporting SISU it's just talking about the way things are)
(that isn't me supporting SISU it's just talking about the way things are)
Pop that as your signature. Might do it myself.
They are not suing they are taking counter action against a legal claim -- the courts will ultimately decide who is right and who is wrong.
Is that the best you can do?
That's all I need to do. I just pointed out that you support SISU's legal action (whatever you like to call it) against the charity.
I don't support it - its part of legal process - or are you saying charities should be above the law?
I don't support it - its part of legal process - or are you saying charities should be above the law?
What are you talking about. We all know Sisu are not just defending the action but are counter-suing for 10 times costs out of spite and to bully a Coventry charity. Most normal Coventry people would be outraged by that.
grendel riles, as per, about as much positive effect as . . . .
This is what I stated previously the Charity would have considered every possibility before going through with this lets just hope they come out on the positive side of things.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Insert the attack on people for not joining in the SISU bash.
Still waiting for the quote I asked for too...
Where was the outrage when a Coventry Charity gave £6million to a failing football team to support it's millionaire owners and players?
Did they give CCFC 6 million?
Yep, for the half of ACL they own.
Got Robinson out of the shit, left everybody else in it.
Nothing to do with Robinson. McGinnity decided to sell the 50% stake to stave off administration which his buddy Bryan had racked up debt to achieve. Really, of all the culpable parties in this situation, the Higgs Charity isn't one of them.
How much do they want for that £6m share now?
How much do they want for that £6m share now?
Nothing to do with Robinson. McGinnity decided to sell the 50% stake to stave off administration which his buddy Bryan had racked up debt to achieve. Really, of all the culpable parties in this situation, the Higgs Charity isn't one of them.
The deal signed with the club at the time had a pre-agreed formula that would be used for valuation of the share. It was McGinnity who got the ball rolling on this, I suggest you direct your complaints to him and the regime of the time rather than the charity which bailed out the club.
I believe it was £10m
I think you're quoting the formula price there which was of course set at the time of sale to prevent the club having to pay a huge amount if the value went up and equally prevent the charity from incurring a loss if the value went down.
Seem to recall the amount agreed when the HOT was drawn up was somewhere in the region of £4-5m.
And should a charity apparently dedicated to the disadvantaged children of the Coventry Area be bailing out a club that had massively overspent?
I can't see where he said he supports it?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?