Gustavo Hamer (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter cc84cov
- Start date
Irish Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
Frostie
Well-Known Member
He volleyed their player, of course it's a foul.
Harsh that it happened to be that one that tipped him over but you can't honestly say it's not a foul - we'd have been screaming for it the other way around.
Gunna go against popular opinion here but actually think Hamer has let us down massively there.
He’ll definitely have known he was 1 booking away from a ban and that Saturday a big game against second bottom (plus no kelly). He played well last night but yet again he was committing constant niggly unnecessary fouls so it was inevitable he’d get booked.
He’ll definitely have known he was 1 booking away from a ban and that Saturday a big game against second bottom (plus no kelly). He played well last night but yet again he was committing constant niggly unnecessary fouls so it was inevitable he’d get booked.
HuckerbyDublinWhelan
Well-Known Member
Ideally we could have had him miss millwall. That will be wind up central, he’ll probably end up with a straight red
Il Pirata
Well-Known Member
Do you think his yellow was a yellow? He was in the motion of striking a shot and the guy came from around the side of him and took the full force of his shot attempt. I've never understood how that is a yellow card. I doubt Hamer could even see him, only feel the pressure.
Something else that happens in a similar - if a player is striking a shot and a defensive player comes in and makes contact with them it always ends up with a wild swing and miss, often them falling to the ground, but it's rarely ever given as a free-kick, and never as a yellow card. General rule of thumb - don't ever try a shot around a defender, there is no advantage to be gained
Irish Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
I disagree. I doubt he was aware that the Huddersfield player was there. The ball was laid back to him, he went to shoot, the Huddersfield player, bravely it has to be said, dived in between Hamer and the ball. I don't see how he has committed a foul. He didn't knowingly contact their player.
NorthernWisdom
Well-Known Member
Hope not, don't want him overdoing his Christmas dinner.
Frostie
Well-Known Member
Unfortunately, that's irrelevant it's still a foul. It shouldn't be a yellow card though in my book, even with the totting up because as you say, he didn't mean to do it.
Brighton Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
Bet he eats the turkey on the half way line
mrtrench
Well-Known Member
He kicked their player not the ball, so it's a foul. The fact that it wasn't intentional doesn't change that. What's bizarre is awarding a yellow card for it.
D
Deleted member 11652
Guest
How long can we keep Hamer?
Lots of people on Twitter reckoning he could well be off in January. I doubt that. If he leaves, it will be next summer.
www.skybluestalk.co.uk
Have a look at that thread. Mental figures. Anyone who disagrees apparently doesn’t rate him. He’s done well so far, does some brilliant things and some stupid things.
robbiekeane
Well-Known Member
I agree that i think he will be gone next summer. Would love to hang on to him but he's a class above.
The 15m numbers are mental, but I wouldn't be surprised to see him go for 8m or something. We sold Maddison for 3m up front and a sizeable sell on % clause and by next summer that will have been 5 years ago. Different player completely obviously and older but, i'd say significantly further along the development curve.
And probably most importantly we are in a league higher so can command a higher fee you know? like not as desperate. 3m back then was probably 150% of our revenue. It's now probably 50%
Irish Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
I did half hope for a second when the ref blew and pointed that he had given a pen.
jordan210
Well-Known Member
Maddison sold for 20m from the championship to Prem. He had 1 full season in the championship.
As long as we stay in the Championship Hamer price will keep going up. If he keeps putting in the performances.
No way would we let Hamer go for anywhere near 5 million.
Mcbean
Well-Known Member
One of the strangest decisions ever seen thst was last night was as if the ref was a Sheffield Wednesday fan
well it was a surprise card for a no card offence
Terry_dactyl
Well-Known Member
Yep. I think it was a poor ball from Giles. If he’d played it slightly shorter would’ve been a good chance of getting a shot on target.
cc84cov
Well-Known Member
Putting Giles on earlier his touch would of been better
KenilworthSkyBlue
Well-Known Member
It's tricky comparing Hamer's potential fee to Maddison's. Maddison was 2 years younger, his stats were hugely impressive for an attacking midfielder and he's English. He was also one of the brightest talents of his age bracket in the country. There's a reason why he went for over £20m.
johnwillomagic
Well-Known Member
It's a bit of a blow Hamer's Yellow - taking sky blue glasses off though he should never have got a yellow for the foul he did in that instance he had committed quite a few clever niggly fouls earlier a more card happy ref would have booked him long before he actually did in the game in reality.
Bit worried that we now have Hamer and Kelly out can see the unbeaten run ending on saturday - guessing option is to put Shippers in there - tbf on occasions Shipley has played that position well but he is very hit n miss in that position - preying he is a hit this Saturday!
Bit worried that we now have Hamer and Kelly out can see the unbeaten run ending on saturday - guessing option is to put Shippers in there - tbf on occasions Shipley has played that position well but he is very hit n miss in that position - preying he is a hit this Saturday!
cc84cov
Well-Known Member
Recall Eccles use him holding with sheaf gets my vote
Londonccfcfan
Well-Known Member
Who was that fool this week claiming they didn’t rate Hamer and he was over rated ?
Show yourself
That was you 2 months ago
cc84cov
Well-Known Member
I seen a post last week someone was struggling to see it with Hamer and felt he was over rated might have been in the new signings thread
steve cooper
Well-Known Member
The telegraph saying it is 2 games ban because Hamer has already received a red card this season.
"Ostigard and Sheaf managed it but Hamer was shown a late yellow card as he tried to get on the end of a pull-back from Ryan Giles. And because he has already had a straight red this season, he is forced to miss the next two games."
www.coventrytelegraph.net
I still think that is incorrect, and I can't find reference to support that anywhere.
The only thing I can find is reference to a player receiving 2 red cards in a season having to serve an extra game suspension on top of the standard suspension. This is not the case with Hamer.
"Ostigard and Sheaf managed it but Hamer was shown a late yellow card as he tried to get on the end of a pull-back from Ryan Giles. And because he has already had a straight red this season, he is forced to miss the next two games."
Coventry City need to find a way to fill midfield void
The big talking points and things learned after Coventry City's goalless draw with Huddersfield Town
I still think that is incorrect, and I can't find reference to support that anywhere.
The only thing I can find is reference to a player receiving 2 red cards in a season having to serve an extra game suspension on top of the standard suspension. This is not the case with Hamer.
Johhny Blue
Well-Known Member
But we’re not playing the second from bottom team
Sky Blue Pete
Well-Known Member
Just nonsense
letsallsingtogether
Well-Known Member
Thought this was going to be another Taxi thread.
