General Election 2019 thread (14 Viewers)

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
Interesting....
7ddaf3906591e181b4bc864cbe5e8f1d.jpg

Was sure I'd heard something on the radio about this being the most diverse parliament we've had. Obviously not!
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Was sure I'd heard something on the radio about this being the most diverse parliament we've had. Obviously not!

Apparently their are 20 LGBTQ Conservative MPs which is 25% more than labour

Embarrassing
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member


Ah yes Mr Blackford, its all about respecting democracy isn't it!o_O How ironic!


Willow da Peeple! Leave means leave! They know what they voted for!

Any head of a union who doesn’t let one of its countries leave when it wants is a dictator!


Love it when Brexiters argue against Scottish independence (or when Remainers argue for it)
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Assume Goldsmith will be turning down his peerage.
View attachment 13731
And we all know the rumours of Farage being in the New Years honours can't be true as he told us himself that he wouldn't accept anything in return for not running candidates against the Conservatives.

Corbyn will be recommending him - he prevented another 20 seats for Johnson including two in Coventry
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
Corbyn will be recommending him - he prevented another 20 seats for Johnson including two in Coventry
Fair play to you Grendel. Corbyn losing in a landslide and announcing he's standing down has done nothing to dampen your complete obsession with him!
 

SkyblueBazza

Well-Known Member
Or the family of one of the 1.3 million to have died as a result of austerity.

But anyway - fuck the dead.... Yay Brexit!!!
Where do you get that from?

The weather rate per 1000 of the population 2010 (when austerity began) to 2018 is actually generally lower than the 10yrs prior to austerity from what I found.

UK: death rate 2000-2017 | Statista

Even dear old factcheck says the quoted 120k deaths due to austerity cannot be proven from the data it is claimed to be from by the...wait for it...Ash Sarkar (Left-wing commentator)

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:

fatso

Well-Known Member
Where do you get that from?

The weather rate per 1000 of the population 2010 (when austerity began) to 2018 is actually generally lower than the 10yrs prior to austerity from what I found.

UK: death rate 2000-2017 | Statista

Even dear old factcheck says the quoted 120k deaths due to austerity cannot be proven from the data it is claimed to be from by the...wait for it...Ash Sarkar (Left-wing commentator)

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
Please don’t let facts get in the way of a good looney left meltdown!
 

SkyblueBazza

Well-Known Member
Please don’t let facts get in the way of a good looney left meltdown!
I think it more a part of their education as they mature to see that the further left you look, the ideals just become more unrealistic the deeper you look.

Wouldn't actually knock them for seeking a way to make it work personally as I think in an ideal world, the wealth health gap between rich & poor would be much better balanced & society overall would benefit. The "how?" is the biggest problem imo.

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
I think it more a part of their education as they mature to see that the further left you look, the ideals just become more unrealistic the deeper you look.

Wouldn't actually knock them for seeking a way to make it work personally as I think in an ideal world, the wealth health gap between rich & poor would be much better balanced & society overall would benefit. The "how?" is the biggest problem imo.

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

You do see this goes both ways at both ends of the spectrum right? The belief that deregulation and tax giveaways on steroids will lead to prosperity has been debunked with disastrous consequences on each occasion it has been implemented. Most of us would agree that a balance of socialism and capitalism is the way to achieve a rounded society. The difficulty comes in where to draw the line between the state and the free market. Again I think most would agree that education and healthcare should be free at the point of use but for instance they wouldn't want state run fast food companies.

It just confuses me sometimes that people can see the benefit of more egalitarian policies but think they're too difficult to achieve so vote for the opposite.
 

SkyblueBazza

Well-Known Member
You do see this goes both ways at both ends of the spectrum right? The belief that deregulation and tax giveaways on steroids will lead to prosperity has been debunked with disastrous consequences on each occasion it has been implemented. Most of us would agree that a balance of socialism and capitalism is the way to achieve a rounded society. The difficulty comes in where to draw the line between the state and the free market. Again I think most would agree that education and healthcare should be free at the point of use but for instance they wouldn't want state run fast food companies.

It just confuses me sometimes that people can see the benefit of more egalitarian policies but think they're too difficult to achieve so vote for the opposite.

Yes I see it from both ends...but Tory policies are not as far right to make them so unrealistic to implement as the Labour left policies are...especially in relation to the current state of play imo.

I mean...I see the benefit to me of a 4 day week. Especially if I get paid the same annual salary. Otherwise, it isn't going to work for me...just one example

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Yes I see it from both ends...but Tory policies are not as far right to make them so unrealistic to implement as the Labour left policies are...especially in relation to the current state of play imo.

I mean...I see the benefit to me of a 4 day week. Especially if I get paid the same annual salary. Otherwise, it isn't going to work for me...just one example

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

The 2019 manifesto was deliberately non-committal so as to make the primary focus on Brexit, but the 2017 one for example went on about mass expansion of grammar schools. A hugely expensive idea that would widen and entrench social inequality. Taking what they've done over the last decade to the point that secondary education is now completely privatised but because it wasn't all done in one go it doesn't hit the headlines. Schools are now run as businesses and the impact of that on classroom teaching has made my job considerably harder.

Labour's manifesto this time was one imagines a 'what the fuck' wish list made because they knew they weren't getting in. The 2017 manifesto however contains little to disagree with and the polling on those ideas backs me up. The dialogue in this country has been dragged to the right for years so that Thatcher's wet dreams are now seen as moderate positions. But proposing a £10 minimum wage makes you a Marxist.
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
Where do you get that from?

The weather rate per 1000 of the population 2010 (when austerity began) to 2018 is actually generally lower than the 10yrs prior to austerity from what I found.

UK: death rate 2000-2017 | Statista

Even dear old factcheck says the quoted 120k deaths due to austerity cannot be proven from the data it is claimed to be from by the...wait for it...Ash Sarkar (Left-wing commentator)

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

Are you denying deaths from austerity and cuts to disabled people's benefits are real?
 

SkyblueBazza

Well-Known Member
Are you denying deaths from austerity and cuts to disabled people's benefits are real?
So are you saying the overall death rate would be lower if it wasn't for austerity?

I am confused as to how you can actually specifically claim that someone died specifically because of austerity...especially when the actual death rate is little different over the time period austerity has been in place from when it wasn't! In fact it is a tad lower.

As for the disabled, I'm not sure why you raise it? Is it relevant to the discussion?

For the record though it doesn't matter what scenario you paint, There are always cases where people suffer as a result of checks & criteria, which is very sad, but the system usually finds a way to get around it's own rules where genuinely needed.

Of course some would suggest a system where we just don't have rules & let everyone & anyone take however much they want from the country's coffers whenever they wish.

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
 

SkyBlueCharlie9

Well-Known Member
A clever (but very smug) one

Whats he said now Fernando ? (I can imagine...people like being lied to etc etc)

ps yet I still have some weird addiction to listening to him !
Why is JOB smug? A very clever chap and critical of all parties but he quite rightly focuses on the Tories most as they are in power. A very talented jounalist/presenter harsh but true and not many of them about holding people to account for their comments and opinions. Farage was destroyed by him. His criticism of Corbyn was bang on too. Boris wouldn't go near an interview with him in a month of Sundays. I can't think of another jouno who is as insightful of him. Makes people think.
 

SkyBlueCharlie9

Well-Known Member
So are you saying the overall death rate would be lower if it wasn't for austerity?

I am confused as to how you can actually specifically claim that someone died specifically because of austerity...especially when the actual death rate is little different over the time period austerity has been in place from when it wasn't! In fact it is a tad lower.

As for the disabled, I'm not sure why you raise it? Is it relevant to the discussion?

For the record though it doesn't matter what scenario you paint, There are always cases where people suffer as a result of checks & criteria, which is very sad, but the system usually finds a way to get around it's own rules where genuinely needed.

Of course some would suggest a system where we just don't have rules & let everyone & anyone take however much they want from the country's coffers whenever they wish.

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
Are you suggesting 20k fewer police and hospitals failing left right and centre has not affected number of deaths? I saw it with my own eyes in Cov hospital with my old man passing away in a corridor lined up with a dozen others in 2017, with only one overstretched doctor in sight. Please think harder before you type in future.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top