It's only 32 on mine?If you're using tapatalk like me, then it's 95 bloody pages......
Sent from my HTC 10 using Tapatalk
I've just realised you can have more posts per page! Mine was set on 10 posts per page. Durrrr hence why I had 95 pages..It's only 32 on mine?
Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
I've just realised you can have more posts per page! Mine was set on 10 posts per page. Durrrr hence why I had 95 pages..
Sent from my HTC 10 using Tapatalk
I just always come to the conclusion that if it is 95 pages Grendel is clearly contributing to the thread.I've just realised you can have more posts per page! Mine was set on 10 posts per page. Durrrr hence why I had 95 pages..
Sent from my HTC 10 using Tapatalk
One of my mates told me a story at the weekend which made me laugh. He pulled the fittest girl he'd ever been with and openly admitted he finished after three thursts (true story).
That literarly reminds me of this thread!
One of my mates told me a story at the weekend which made me laugh. He pulled the fittest girl he'd ever been with and openly admitted he finished after three thursts (true story).
That literarly reminds me of this thread!
If she gives him another chance.......Least he is honest, next time she will be happy if he manages 5. Don't want to start off like a stallion
That's no good. We don't want a winger that plays as a striker, we always like a striker that we can stick out on the wing.I saw him a few times last season, looked decent enough but never made me think he looks better than the level he was playing at. From what I remember he seemed to be more of a winger than a striker, I may be wrong though.
I've liked that but it's absolutely maddening.That's no good. We don't want a winger that plays as a striker, we always like a striker that we can stick out on the wing.
My thoughts exactly, if Ponticelli is a real prospect why would we bring someone in who is potentially nearer to 1st team action therefor depriving Ponticelli a chance so ultimately he fucks off somewhere else????Why would Courtney Baker-Richardson be coming in when we have Poncticelli? We don't need a young striker to take a punt on. IMO, Robins had numerous strikers on a shortlist, however he came to the decision that Biamou was the right man. Whilst it's likely that CBR may have been on that list, it's equally as likely he was fairly low down.
My thoughts exactly, if Ponticelli is a real prospect why would we bring someone in who is potentially nearer to 1st team action therefor depriving Ponticelli a chance so ultimately he fucks off somewhere else????
Football used to be the working man's game, but look at all the upper classed double-barreled toffs coming through the ranks now
Baker-Richardson
Oxlade-Chamberlain
Loftus Cheek
Maitland-Niles
Calvert-Lewin
Borthwick-Jackson
Charles-Cook
Squad photo
I have sprayed oneI'd take CBR (600cc - preferably Repsol Racing Colours)
Did we even sign a former player? Or is Ruffian just a clown?
We all knew about that before this stupid thread came upWe actually have signed one
We all knew about that before this stupid thread came uphas the OP admitted it was just bollocks?
Nah, he said it was Courtney baker richardson who was in talks but now has no idea if its happening or not. So yeah, bollocks.
For a customer...personally don't like bikesLike it that much?
Is that a young Boris I spy at bottom right. Now there's a player! :happy:
Aren't Letwin & Osbourne there too?And is it big Dave Cameron on the back row, 2nd from the left?
Aren't Letwin & Osbourne there too?
Aren't Letwin & Osbourne there too?
"No Maddy, we mustn't make the mistake of thinking that something's impossible, just because it's implausible"
George Osbourne Bullingdon Club pic, looks like Jonathan Creek
The man is a porn start compared to me, I have always been an in out repeat if necessary kinda guyOne of my mates told me a story at the weekend which made me laugh. He pulled the fittest girl he'd ever been with and openly admitted he finished after three thursts (true story).
That literarly reminds me of this thread!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?