Between 9-5
Is their any indication of what time the meeting is taking place, is Simon able to find out ? when will any news be unveiled?
With lunch 11-4
What a way to make a living
Be fair mate. No one has a five hour lunch break, not even the FL.
As I understand it their schedule is actually rather hectic, as below:
9 - 10: Breakfast
10 - 11: Tiffin (a personal favourite)
11 - 12: Elevenses
12 - 3: Lunch
3 - 4: Tea break
4 - 5: Dinner
5:00pm - hometime.
The FL already confirmed the money was where they asked it to be.
And here was just about all of us thinking that they had requested the money to have been paid straight to ACL and not put into an account that SISU has control of :facepalm:
The big advantage that SISU have is that the FL nearly always comes down on the side of club owners. And as long as they keep paying their football debts the FL will keep helping them as much as they can.
And here was just about all of us thinking that they had requested the money to have been paid straight to ACL and not put into an account that SISU has control of :facepalm:
The big advantage that SISU have is that the FL nearly always comes down on the side of club owners. And as long as they keep paying their football debts the FL will keep helping them as much as they can.
And here was just about all of us thinking that they had requested the money to have been paid straight to ACL and not put into an account that SISU has control of :facepalm:
The big advantage that SISU have is that the FL nearly always comes down on the side of club owners. And as long as they keep paying their football debts the FL will keep helping them as much as they can.
They had no legal reason to make a payment to ACL a condition at all which doesn't reconcile with your statement.
Do SISU have control of the account? I thought it was controlled by the FL.
Do SISU have control of the account? I thought it was controlled by the FL.
They had no legal reason to make a payment to ACL a condition at all which doesn't reconcile with your statement.
Our owners believe they dont have to pay anything to any one fullstopThey had no legal reason to make a payment to ACL a condition at all which doesn't reconcile with your statement.
They had no legal reason to make a payment to ACL a condition at all which doesn't reconcile with your statement.
defending the indefensible... with the law(an apparent) that is an ass.. but then..
They had no legal reason to make a payment to ACL a condition at all which doesn't reconcile with your statement.
I am defending no one. I am merely saying the notion raised by astute that the league only care about clubs is wrong as they had no obligation to order any payment.
They had no legal contract with ACL to make the payment. Doesn't mean that they don't have a legal contract with the FL to make a payment to the ACL does it? Surely when the golden share was awarded to Otium there would have been a legal contract between the FL and Otium and if as we are led to believe the £590k payment was part of the conditions of receiving the golden share would it be unreasonable to expect this to be part of the contract?
In other words there is a legal requirement for Otium to make the ACL payment.
It still isn't a legal requirement. It is a FL requirement. And they make/bend the rules.
I wasn't talking about the FL's "rules" I was talking about a legally binding business contract between two entities.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?