fernandopartridge
Well-Known Member
Good to see you and G haven't let the absence of the gallic galactico stop these debates
Good to see you and G haven't let the absence of the gallic galactico stop these debatesCan't compete with you in terms of comedy of course - no one can.
Comedy gold is calling for taxis for 4 years in a row........... for of course the most successful English manager over the last 4 seasons.
An absolute genius at work - kudos to you.
They sold him for less than they paid us so we wouldn't get anything even if we didDo we reckon we have a sell on for Chaplin?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Do we get a sell on?
You would hope that when these big clubs steal young players and you get a tiny development fee that the sell on deal should be huge, but I doubt it is.
For me I'd forego a tiny development fee in exchange for a perpetual sell-on clause of 50%.
If it was done in line with EPPP the selling club don't get a say in the matter.
I can't remember the ins & outs of the McCann deal tbh.
Yeah, what I'm saying is that the clause should be automatically in that. You might get a tiny development fee that probably equates to a day's pay for one of the big club's players and that's it. There's far more potential in sell-on fees.
It always seem pitifully low to me given the amount of money in the PL. Absolutely nothing to a club like Man United and actively encourages them to get the hoover out.Yeah.
For some reason I believe we may have agreed a deal outside of EPPP with United but hypothetically, as an example & rough, fag packet maths...
I believe McCann was with us from age 7 & left at 15.
We would get £3k per year compensation for foundation phase (9-11) then, as a Cat 2 academy it's £25k per year for youth development phase (12-16).
So upfront fee = £84k
As he was under 16 we would then be entitled to appearance fees (he never made any) + 20% of his next transfer fee (if under 24) & then 5% of any future transfer fees but crucially only domestically.
It always seem pitifully low to me given the amount of money in the PL. Absolutely nothing to a club like Man United and actively encourages them to get the hoover out.
Yeah.
For some reason I believe we may have agreed a deal outside of EPPP with United but hypothetically, as an example & rough, fag packet maths...
I believe McCann was with us from age 7 & left at 15.
We would get £3k per year compensation for foundation phase (9-11) then, as a Cat 2 academy it's £25k per year for youth development phase (12-16).
So upfront fee = £84k
As he was under 16 we would then be entitled to appearance fees (he never made any) + 20% of his next transfer fee (if under 24) & then 5% of any future transfer fees but crucially only domestically.
Yeah.
For some reason I believe we may have agreed a deal outside of EPPP with United but hypothetically, as an example & rough, fag packet maths...
I believe McCann was with us from age 7 & left at 15.
We would get £3k per year compensation for foundation phase (9-11) then, as a Cat 2 academy it's £25k per year for youth development phase (12-16).
So upfront fee = £84k
As he was under 16 we would then be entitled to appearance fees (he never made any) + 20% of his next transfer fee (if under 24) & then 5% of any future transfer fees but crucially only domestically.
So we're not likely to receive the set appearance fees should he make them, think they start at something like £10k, then increase after the first 25?Yeah.
For some reason I believe we may have agreed a deal outside of EPPP with United but hypothetically, as an example & rough, fag packet maths...
I believe McCann was with us from age 7 & left at 15.
We would get £3k per year compensation for foundation phase (9-11) then, as a Cat 2 academy it's £25k per year for youth development phase (12-16).
So upfront fee = £84k
As he was under 16 we would then be entitled to appearance fees (he never made any) + 20% of his next transfer fee (if under 24) & then 5% of any future transfer fees but crucially only domestically.
So we're not likely to receive the set appearance fees should he make them, think they start at something like £10k, then increase after the first 25?
Have to be for the club he's signed for?.
Why would we cede that option?
Edit - or are chances so remote as seeing an Igloo on the equator?
Yeah.
For some reason I believe we may have agreed a deal outside of EPPP with United but hypothetically, as an example & rough, fag packet maths...
I believe McCann was with us from age 7 & left at 15.
We would get £3k per year compensation for foundation phase (9-11) then, as a Cat 2 academy it's £25k per year for youth development phase (12-16).
So upfront fee = £84k
As he was under 16 we would then be entitled to appearance fees (he never made any) + 20% of his next transfer fee (if under 24) & then 5% of any future transfer fees but crucially only domestically.
Ah sorry should have read further into the thread, thought I read yesterday he was going on loan.I believe the set appearance fees transfer to his new club. The problem being, he's not transferring to an English club therefore I believe it's likely null & void and we'll receive nothing further unless he returns to play in England again.
…or ambition.Just read the deal is up to 750k and he will go and play in the Rangers b team does this lad not like the idea of first team football?
So out of interest, Ranger sign him - no %age to us. Man Utd put a 50% sell-on cluase in and Everton, say, sign him in two years time = still no %age to us?
Get in the team, win some medals, get a profile, come back to first team football at the Everton level.Why would any young footballer choose to go and play in Scotland?
But is football still that bigoted to divide along these lines?He opted to play for the Republic of Ireland instead of England I believe, but has now signed for Glasgow Rangers. Weird.
But is football still that bigoted to divide along these lines?
Yeah I know it's still huge on the terraces but Club hierarchies and players are beyond there now I would expect?Rangers still sing about fenians as far as I'm aware
Didn't do Maddison any harm!Why would any young footballer choose to go and play in Scotland?
Didn't do Maddison any harm!
Just read the deal is up to 750k and he will go and play in the Rangers b team does this lad not like the idea of first team football?
Yep and being up to their knees in blood - even weirder is those who have zero affiliation to Scotland yet still support them as a ‘second team’.Rangers still sing about fenians as far as I'm aware
One year left on his dealIf that's true it seems an even odder choice. Reserves for Man U or playing reserves in Scotland? Also if that were the case I can't imagine Rangers would be willing to pay him that much.
Surely he's got to be going there with the desire for first team football at the age of 19?
You get that on both sides, everyone seems to have 'Scottish team' (aka Rangers or Celtic), it's bizarre. See plenty of shirts out and about in Cov. I don't like either of them.Yep and being up to their news in blood - even weirder is those who have zero affiliation to Scotland yet still support them as a ‘second team’.
Yep I find it really odd too. Next people will be having an Andorran team or a Maltese team.You get that on both sides, everyone seems to have 'Scottish team' (aka Rangers or Celtic), it's bizarre. See plenty of shirts out and about in Cov. I don't like either of them.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?