Do you want to discuss boring politics? (29 Viewers)

mmttww

Well-Known Member
Jan 22, 2014
4,685
7,004
313
regarding left wing people and frankly if the Tories has delivered this shambles many would be all over it.

I mean... it seems people are all over it or you'd be talking to yourself. I don't see anyone defending them a whole lot, and most people on here who'd probably fall into the 'left' bucket have seemed wary and critical of Starmer from the outset. Don't think Labour have a monopoly on over promising and under delivering either. 'Levelling Up' and all that.
 

rob9872

Well-Known Member
Mar 21, 2011
17,552
15,669
313
She can come off as too righteous when she talks especially in the Commons, but I'm struggling to see what qualifies her as 'horrible'? Help me understand why she gets singled out quite a lot, because she seems a long way from the worst offender in that chamber, either from a policy or a behaviour POV.
I didn't like her from day 1. All the antisemitic posts were ok because they were 'historic', not a valid excuse for the other side of the house though. Since then she seems to be meddling in the popularity politics, whip removed, supports Palestine Action, is very trans rights that I disagree with on womens spaces, supports Liverpool and then pretends to be City for Wembley. If you like her that's fine and your choice of course, but she's not for me.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Sep 19, 2011
87,350
42,224
813
I just want fairness in how long people have

He has dug himself a huge hole and turned a huge majority into a problem as now there is a strong faction who will stand up to him and he has shown to be pathetically weak against them.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Jan 11, 2012
62,314
45,394
763
Coventry
He has dug himself a huge hole and turned a huge majority into a problem as now there is a strong faction who will stand up to him and he has shown to be pathetically weak against them.
There will be a huge number who know they stand to lose their seats if this government continues as it is.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Sep 19, 2011
87,350
42,224
813
There will be a huge number who know they stand to lose their seats if this government continues as it is.

A lot would anyway but he should have just told them he'd remove the whip and dissolve parliament rather than cave in.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mucca Mad Boys

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
Dec 9, 2011
41,433
47,920
313
Not really buying into the idea that the ISA changes are a wealth tax. Pretty sure when most people refer to a wealth tax they're thinking of the 1% and billionaires, not regular workers trying to put a few quid away.

Anyway, went hunting for some stats, not sure I'd be targeting people earing £10-50K for a wealth tax.

View attachment 44092
The income ranges look a bit off to me, if it's gross per year then min wage is £20k-29999k. Assume a lot of the holders are pensioners, or at least a lot of the money in Cash ISAs belongs to pensioners.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
Dec 9, 2011
41,433
47,920
313
It's the 300bn in cash ISAs they want to "push" into investment etc

It's just magic thinking isn't it? just pushes share prices up, somebody buying a share does not mean that a company then invests that money. Where are the incentives for companies to invest? FTSE index is at historically high levels but business investment is not.
 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
Jul 26, 2012
14,757
10,141
313
Coventry
He has dug himself a huge hole and turned a huge majority into a problem as now there is a strong faction who will stand up to him and he has shown to be pathetically weak against them.
That and he’s proven himself to be a weak man who folds under pressure. Be it from his party, the public or anyone.
 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
Jul 26, 2012
14,757
10,141
313
Coventry
A lot would anyway but he should have just told them he'd remove the whip and dissolve parliament rather than cave in.

Starmer wants to be PM but doesn’t know what he wants to do in government. It’s taken less than a year to figure that out.

A strong leader would’ve done that, Theresa May should’ve threatened to call a general election to whip the Brexit Spartans into line. She didn’t because she was a weak PM.

The polls are that bad for Labour, you’d have to be a lunatic to risk a PM calling a general election if they lost a vote on ‘key’ legislation.
 

StrettoBoy

Well-Known Member
Aug 5, 2023
1,436
1,772
163
just pushes share prices up, somebody buying a share does not mean that a company then invests that money.

I agree.

It is also often the case that someone buying shares doesn't raise a farthing for the company because the trade is a sale by an existing shareholder. The company only raises capital if it is an issue of new shares, whether on a listing or otherwise.

Building Societies and other lenders raise a lot of their working capital from cash ISAs and there is genuine concern that, if this form of fundraising is significantly restricted, there will be a shortage of mortgage funds. If this happens mortgage rates are likely to rise.
 

Captain Dart

Well-Known Member
Oct 26, 2013
10,803
5,343
313
20250702_194245.jpg
20250702_192453.jpg
Is everybody happy?
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Sky Blue Pete

Captain Dart

Well-Known Member
Oct 26, 2013
10,803
5,343
313

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
Aug 11, 2011
8,939
7,696
263
The fall out unfolds.



wasting your time, some just don’t get the correlation between an unstable government that is showing no ability to control spending and bond prices/borrowing costs going up

Not only does Reeves have an additional hole to fill from the welfare climbdown, unless things settle down, she (or her replacement) will have an even greater hole due to increased borrowing costs….and the downward spiral would continue
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
Nov 24, 2012
40,338
23,007
313
wasting your time, some just don’t get the correlation between an unstable government that is showing no ability to control spending and bond prices/borrowing costs going up

Not only does Reeves have an additional hole to fill from the welfare climbdown, unless things settle down, she (or her replacement) will have an even greater hole due to increased borrowing costs….and the downward spiral would continue
The answer is increase taxation and get on top of defence spending
 

Captain Dart

Well-Known Member
Oct 26, 2013
10,803
5,343
313
“Favorite rejoinder of Senator Harry S. Truman, when a member of his war contracts investigating committee objects to his strenuous pace: ‘If you don’t like the heat, get out of the kitchen’.”

Yes they are human beings who are taking it hard but to be a front line politician you must be very very robust. Are they suited to the job at hand, I do not think so.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Sep 19, 2011
87,350
42,224
813
They are human beings you know that don’t you

So were Liz Truss, Boris Johnson and Rishi Sunak. Scum according to the deputy PM. Spare me the tears.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Sep 19, 2011
87,350
42,224
813
Interesting Pete finds that funny
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Sep 19, 2011
87,350
42,224
813
I’ve taken a battering today it was a smile
Chillax
Boris was an absolute clown

So is Reeves - only difference is she believes she is a serious politician. I wouldn't trust her with managing the petty cash in a chip shop. Totally out of her depth and an embarrassment.

Starmer is another Cameron. Loves the title - hates accountability and scrutiny.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mucca Mad Boys

fatso

Well-Known Member
Jun 19, 2017
11,757
12,453
313
taxation will almost certainly have to increase but it will almost certainly be all of us paying it. Defence is a drop in the ocean compared to NHS and welfare
Believe it or not there's some idiots on here who think a government with its own currency can just print more and nore money, with absolutely no consequences.

Honestly, I kid you not!!!
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
Dec 9, 2011
41,433
47,920
313
Oh how will I cope without the approval of you and that buffoon.
I have never said that a government can print more and more money without consequence, I have consistently said that a government that issues its own currency is not dependent on tax to spend.
It must always spend first otherwise it would be unable to collect any tax.
I'm sure fatlad will agree that a sensible government should tax passive income and unearned wealth to mitigate inflationary pressure and encourage fairer asset distribution.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Mucca Mad Boys

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Sep 19, 2011
87,350
42,224
813
oops

 
  • Haha
Reactions: SIR ERNIE

Users who are viewing this thread