I don’t agree but that’s ok we don’t have to agree.You do realise that's actually what comparing is?
I don’t agree but that’s ok we don’t have to agree.
I’m interested in your and others binary approach. Any sexual offences seem to have an additional stigma.
We should probably understand that this leave society at risk of more crime in this area and not less
That’s my point.
Would you stay in contact with a friend who was an alcoholic and help them?
Would you stay in contact with a friend who is struggling with drug addiction and help them?
Would you stay in contact with a friend who beat someone up and help them?
I know I’m wasting my time but I’ll keep trying because if people who commit sexual crime have accommodation on release from prison, contact with people and something to do they are hugely less likely to reoffend
I know you think I’m a naive prick with no life experience but thems the facts
Fair I did bring up the white stuff and I’m sorry for doing soTbf Pete, reading back and despite all the petty cheap shots at each other, you opened it up by suggesting it should say 'white nonce' and leading the narrative that it always mentions it the other way. It doesn't, when the reverse is true, it often says Muslim, so on that basis rather than white you should have gone Christian or Agnostic and not brought colour into it. It reads as though you love the fact this is a white nonce, can't we all agree that all nonces are bad regardless of background? He's also a lone ranger, not working in gangs. Equally abhorrent on its own, and everyone rightly outraged, but when speaking about grooming gangs it's a different conversation.
Tbh you're a bit all over the place with it and if you revel in the fact that we've got our own cunts to justify the existence of others then I think I'd probably sit this one out.
I don’t agree but that’s ok we don’t have to agree.
I’m interested in your and others binary approach. Any sexual offences seem to have an additional stigma.
We should probably understand that this leave society at risk of more crime in this area and not less
That’s my point.
Would you stay in contact with a friend who was an alcoholic and help them?
Would you stay in contact with a friend who is struggling with drug addiction and help them?
Would you stay in contact with a friend who beat someone up and help them?
I know I’m wasting my time but I’ll keep trying because if people who commit sexual crime have accommodation on release from prison, contact with people and something to do they are hugely less likely to reoffend
I know you think I’m a naive prick with no life experience but thems the facts
Pete, I don't find it acceptable to be friends with somebody who has sexually assaulted a child. It's as simple as that.
Maybe if more people would be like this then there would be less covering up of grooming gangs.
Having a mate who had a drunken fight isn't the same as having a mate who groomed and sexually assaulted a child.
Deliberately put as binary because they’re not i completely agree hence asking the questionsThe options you present are binary.
Would you sympathise with an alcoholic? Depends as said alcoholic could when intoxicated smash his wifes face in every night with children cowering under the bed.
Likewise a drug addict that mugs a pensioner in the street as they "need" a fix
A friend beats his girlfriend as she doesn't want sex that night
Unfortunately as someone who has addictions I don't buy into this bullshit that things are beyond your control so you can excuse behaviours. I've seen people in groups convince themselves alcohol and drug abuse is worse than cancer as its never cured or sympathised with. I have heard people describe things they have done behind the sanctity of a Group that people just would not believe.
Actually people need to take ownership and stop or accept the consequence of their own behaviours.
Never needed to but think it’s quite well accepted as a useful model out of addictionHe has fully swallowed the 12 step BS
Ok I’d respect you either way. I wouldn’t think you were condoning their behaviour or actions if you did choose to. Your friendship may be what means they don’t offend again.Pete, I don't find it acceptable to be friends with somebody who has sexually assaulted a child. It's as simple as that.
Maybe if more people would be like this then there would be less covering up of grooming gangs.
Having a mate who had a drunken fight isn't the same as having a mate who groomed and sexually assaulted a child.
It might also mean that's no consequence so they keep doing it if their "friends" think it's ok.Ok I’d respect you either way. I wouldn’t think you were condoning their behaviour or actions if you did choose to. Your friendship may be what means they don’t offend again.
True especially if the contact is misunderstoodIt might also mean that's no consequence so they keep doing it if their "friends" think it's ok.
Even more so when friends and family help cover it up.True especially if the contact is misunderstood
I didn't think there were going to be many, hasn't Labour cancelled half of them to 'reorganise local government' or put more distance between the public and decision makers if you're an old cynic like me.Looks like he’ll survive the week and probably go after the local elections
Either stubborn or resilient depends on your view
Completely agree or minimise what was done or the impact on those affectedEven more so when friends and family help cover it up.
Think the local councils asked for permission to cancel them if there were boundaries that were being reorganised and somewhere between that and your explanation lies the truthI didn't think there were going to be many, hasn't Labour cancelled half of them to 'reorganise local government' or put more distance between the public and decision makers if you're an old cynic like me.
Never needed to but think it’s quite well accepted as a useful model out of addiction
I have to say my experience is friends and family think their continued contact would be seen to condone what’s been done and would negatively affect themEven more so when friends and family help cover it up.
For alcohol?It has a 93% failure rate
I have to say my experience is friends and family think their continued contact would be seen to condone what’s been done and would negatively affect them
This speaks to what you are saying but I can’t find anything that says it fails 93% of the time
I struggle with hypotheticals , yes don’t laugh honestly I doOut of interest and this is honestly true
A few years ago one of my friends had a friendship (I think fairly casual) with someone who I did comedy gigs in holiday camps. One day he said he was off for a while travelling with Nick Griffin as the BNP warm up for his speech - he admitted he was an active member. He never spoke to him again. Would you just accept his beliefs?
Alcohol.
"Evidence please" - is ironic as you swallow subjective nonsense
.
Wow fuckin hell thanks so much
What’s npr??
This interesting tooWow fuckin hell thanks so much
What’s npr??
You were citing it as expert evidence rather than subjectiveNo idea - why?
This interesting too
Thanks for shining a light on this
You were citing it as expert evidence rather than subjective
Out of interest what subjective nonsense do I accept?
I'm just trying to think how that gig would've gone, assuming what the audience might want. All i can visualise is Basil Fawlty and lots of low rent gags I'm amusing myself with. My head space can be such a curse!Out of interest and this is honestly true
A few years ago one of my friends had a friendship (I think fairly casual) with someone who I did comedy gigs in holiday camps. One day he said he was off for a while travelling with Nick Griffin as the BNP warm up for his speech - he admitted he was an active member. He never spoke to him again. Would you just accept his beliefs?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?