Nope wrong againBecause having a cheeky wank over fake taxi is obviously the same as sexually assaulting children.
That mate I've got that had a scrap outside ikon in 2003, just as bad as saville.
AbsolutelyAnd yet the overwhelming majority of men and women who look at porn don’t.
Not if they are involved in criminal activity as I understand itThe programme it seems allows nonces anonymity to talk about their urges regarding abusing children
To what?Are you brainwashed?
Nope wrong again
Don’t you worry I’m sure you’ll never have to deal with anyone in your friendship group.
Did you read it -
Don’t worry about me I’m just trying to do my best to reduce danger to women and children
We all have those things we are passionate about and it’s a good thing we don’t all the share the same ones.
Just nonsense but I understand why you would say thatYeah it's really reducing the risk by sympathising, defending and comparing it to somebody having a wank. Let's face it, what you are posting is no better than people defending grooming gangs.
That self awareness I said a couple of pages back..
Hate to break it to you. You are sympathising with nonces. You're also trying to play it down.Just nonsense but I understand why you would say that
There’s no defending grooming gangs there’s no defending any sexual offences or criminal activity
There’s no sympathising with either pr equivalence other than what you’re implying
For some people with addictions they escalate it’s not hard to understand unless you don’t want to
And this one Andy
there is a real danger that the risk is increased by taking nicks binary approach. He’s not wrong he’s just misinformed
Sue Grey in?McSweeney gone, long overdue. Good recruitment of his replacement is vital now.
McSweeney gone, long overdue. Good recruitment of his replacement is vital now.
Who appointed McSweeney?McSweeney gone, long overdue. Good recruitment of his replacement is vital now.
Who appointed McSweeney?
I agree he should be removed, he isn't elected and had far too much power and influence without it seems any oversight.McSweeney gone, long overdue. Good recruitment of his replacement is vital now.
Starmer is a dead man walking. If McSweeney had to resign over Mandelson, why should Starmer remain?Who appointed McSweeney?
Wonder which droid the Zionists will appoint next?
Rayner or Miliband imo. The latter is popular with Labour members and as you say, Rayner is under investigation for her tax affairs.If he goes who is next in the hotseat. Burnham is out as he got blocked, Raynor is still under investigation, Streeting is Mandelson's protege so presumably he would be out.
Reeves is far from popular, Lammy is useless (although to be fair that applies to most of parliament), Miliband isn't getting another go.
Then you're into the likes of Kendall, Nandy, Copper and Phillipson.
Its not exactly inspiring is it?
If he goes who is next in the hotseat. Burnham is out as he got blocked, Raynor is still under investigation, Streeting is Mandelson's protege so presumably he would be out.
Reeves is far from popular, Lammy is useless (although to be fair that applies to most of parliament), Miliband isn't getting another go.
Then you're into the likes of Kendall, Nandy, Copper and Phillipson.
Its not exactly inspiring is it?
A much better person than any prime minister 15 or so years.I for one am ready to finally get chaos with Ed Miliband
I don’t think there’s a seat that Labour can win in the country at present is there?Exactly. If the PLP force the issue they're signing their own P45 - under any of these contenders the party's likely to collapse to rump at GE.
Burnham timed his run a few months too early- can/will he try again in May?
Rayner or Miliband imo. The latter is popular with Labour members and as you say, Rayner is under investigation for her tax affairs.
Rayner is also on record calling on Sunak to call a GE after his coronation as PM… There’s always a tweet!
One of the only things keeping Starmer in post for this long is the lack of a clear and obvious successor.
I'd rather have Miliband than any other of the shite that have ran since he went for PM last.What a shitshow. Miliband who was previously rejected by the country even after it had 5 years of austerity under the coalition and Rayner who resigned due to her tax affairs and who’s former department is overseeing the lowest housing starts for years (decades in some areas).
I'd rather have Miliband than any other of the shite that have ran since he went for PM last.
I'd rather have Miliband than any other of the shite that have ran since he went for PM last.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?