Do you want to discuss boring politics? (16 Viewers)

[Sky Blue Pete]

Because having a cheeky wank over fake taxi is obviously the same as sexually assaulting children.

That mate I've got that had a scrap outside ikon in 2003, just as bad as saville.

Nope wrong again
Don’t you worry I’m sure you’ll never have to deal with anyone in your friendship group.

Did you read it -

Don’t worry about me I’m just trying to do my best to reduce danger to women and children

We all have those things we are passionate about and it’s a good thing we don’t all the share the same ones.

 

---

[Sky Blue Pete]

And yet the overwhelming majority of men and women who look at porn don’t.

Absolutely

 

[Sky Blue Pete]

The programme it seems allows nonces anonymity to talk about their urges regarding abusing children

Not if they are involved in criminal activity as I understand it
I have thought about volunteering but I don’t think I could cope

 

[Sky Blue Pete]

Are you brainwashed?

To what?

 

[Nick]

Nope wrong again
Don’t you worry I’m sure you’ll never have to deal with anyone in your friendship group.

Did you read it -

Don’t worry about me I’m just trying to do my best to reduce danger to women and children

We all have those things we are passionate about and it’s a good thing we don’t all the share the same ones.

Yeah it's really reducing the risk by sympathising, defending and comparing it to somebody having a wank. Let's face it, what you are posting is no better than people defending grooming gangs.

That self awareness I said a couple of pages back..

 

[Sky Blue Pete]

Yeah it's really reducing the risk by sympathising, defending and comparing it to somebody having a wank. Let's face it, what you are posting is no better than people defending grooming gangs.

That self awareness I said a couple of pages back..

Just nonsense but I understand why you would say that
There’s no defending grooming gangs there’s no defending any sexual offences or criminal activity
There’s no sympathising with either pr equivalence other than what you’re implying
For some people with addictions they escalate it’s not hard to understand unless you don’t want to

 

[Nick]

Just nonsense but I understand why you would say that
There’s no defending grooming gangs there’s no defending any sexual offences or criminal activity
There’s no sympathising with either pr equivalence other than what you’re implying
For some people with addictions they escalate it’s not hard to understand unless you don’t want to

Hate to break it to you. You are sympathising with nonces. You're also trying to play it down.

Don't worry, I'm sure you can blame farage next time he uses the wrong stamp.

 

[SBAndy]

And this one Andy



there is a real danger that the risk is increased by taking nicks binary approach. He’s not wrong he’s just misinformed

Not clicked on the first link you’ve sent me (I’m on the way to the game, after all!) but a very brief skim-read of this it’s talking about sex offenders in general, not nonces.

Will look at the other one later.