Going from “it’s a non story without much media interest” to “online paedo shoutouts are a central plank of our election strategy” is fantastic work
Can you honestly even remember which point you’re supposed to be arguing anymore?
Going from “it’s a non story without much media interest” to “online paedo shoutouts are a central plank of our election strategy” is fantastic workWell I don't think he needs £50. One thing Reform have done is use all social media avenues and use algorithms to boost its profile. Its obsessed with all channels and believes in maximising SEO to its full.
Its working as you are talking about it
Francis Lee: Reform are the social media masters
[vc_row type=”in_container” full_screen_row_position=”middle” column_margin=”default” column_direction=”default” column_direction_tablet=”default” column_direction_phone=”default” scene_position=”…centrewrite.brightblue.org.uk
So the best way to raise Reform's profile is to send a video commemorating one of the most despicable and high profile peadophiles of this country in the last few years?
That's much worse than him doing it for the grift of £50 that he doesn't need.
Going from “it’s a non story without much media interest” to “online paedo shoutouts are a central plank of our election strategy” is fantastic work
Can you honestly even remember which point you’re supposed to be arguing anymore?
Talking about the leader reading a tribute to one of the most notorious sex offenders in recent times is a sign Reform's strategy is working?!
What are you actually saying? There’s a lot of posts in a row from you and you seem to be getting a bit defensive. I didn’t mean to upset you by criticising Big Nige.I don't think I actually said that
What are you actually saying? There’s a lot of posts in a row from you and you seem to be getting a bit defensive. I didn’t mean to upset you by criticising Big Nige.
He's been doing it before Reform were even about wasn't he. Its clearly for the cashSo the best way to raise Reform's profile is to send a video commemorating one of the most despicable and high profile peadophiles of this country in the last few years?
That's much worse than him doing it for the grift of £50 that he doesn't need.
I don’t think there’s any tension between me thinking that he’s a likely future PM and that he’s also capable of dumb mistakes like this, is there?I think Nigel Farage is a chancer - to suggest he is not a skilled operator though is beyond dumb -after all you think he is a Prime Minister in waiting - think about that.
I don’t think there’s any tension between me thinking that he’s a likely future PM and that he’s also capable of dumb mistakes like this, is there?
Why do you seem so allergic to anyone pointing out these comical screw-ups of his? It reliably sends you flailing in all directions - you were scoffing at the idea it might be a story of note, now here you are a week later clogging up the thread trying to play it off as another tactical masterclass from Nige.
I would say you and Pete are obsessed more than anyone with Nigel Farage. Why? Its a tiny party that according to you is finished because of this video. You post far more about Reform than the Greens - yet you are saying its a failing strategy.
He's made £140k supposedly from his cameo's.I am hardly allergic - you think he needs £50 - "clogging up a thread" - yes its a hive of activity discussing other topics
He's made £140k supposedly from his cameo's.
Hardly the odd £50.
Well yes lots of £50's add up.Someone said he was grifting for £50 quid
Well yes lots of £50's add up.
Its almost as bad as when someone "tricked" him into saying a pro irish republic phrase.
Clearly not and thats quite concerning.Has it damaged him in any way politically?
Whether he needs it or wants it is a matter for his bank manager (whoever that is these days). I think that’s his motivation for making the video paying tribute to a paedophile - are you standing by your claim that he did it “to try and get an engagement from young voters” (sic)?I am hardly allergic - you think he needs £50 - "clogging up a thread" - yes its a hive of activity discussing other topics
Ok? That doesn’t imply he genuinely supports him, just that he took cash to do so and it should be a bigger story.The first comment was;
"Feels like the man currently in pole position to become the next Prime Minister agreeing to pay tribute to the country’s most notorious paedophile in exchange for cash should be a bigger story."
Oh has his line changed from "well he probably didn't know who he was"Whether he needs it or wants it is a matter for his bank manager (whoever that is these days). I think that’s his motivation for making the video paying tribute to a paedophile - are you standing by your claim that he did it “to try and get an engagement from young voters” (sic)?
I personally didn’t think it was worth re-upping this story over a point as obvious as this, but clearly some people had trouble understanding it.Ok? That doesn’t imply he genuinely supports him, just that he took cash to do so and it should be a bigger story.
Brighton's TV doesn't tune into popular entertainment.
You’re right. Just a very odd hill for Grendel to on.I personally didn’t think it was worth re-upping this story over a point as obvious as this, but clearly some people had trouble understanding it.
Double speak,as I've outlined IMO.What’s the alternative explanation for him doing the video?
I don't think he needs that money.He's made £140k supposedly from his cameo's.
Hardly the odd £50.
Well he doesn't need it as he's not on the breadline, he's not gonna turn it down clearly.I don't think he needs that money.
Andy Burnham….
thats wut they need thoMaybe communicate stuff a bit better is all I can think of
He’d have to it can’t be worse can it?Not sure this is going to go down well with the wider public. They vote parties in to govern the country, not jump from one lot of infighting narcissists to another
The Tories were a shambles for the last couple of years of their time with all the internal battles (some would argue back to Brexit) and fuck all got done
The government has decided to tax, borrow and spend tens of billions more per annum. The country isnt happy with the output to date but playing devils advocate it’s only 18 months or so in. What is burnham going to do different ? Maybe communicate stuff a bit better is all I can think of
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?