In practice what does this mean? If an immigrant loses their job the clock starts ticking?
In theory, that’s how the system works currently. Your visa can be cancelled if you no longer meet the conditions. In practice, this isn’t working as intended because we have issued way more health & social care visas than roles filled.
In Denmark, non-Danish citizens are barred from all benefits and permanent residency until you have to passed a Public Benefit Test. Which assesses your financial contributions to the state. If you fail this test, the deportation procedures are initiated.
With the NHS being taxpayer funded, I don’t think it would be unreasonable for mandating migrants to have comprehensive private healthcare coverage as a condition of a visa.
I don’t know why those services didn’t do their job properly. But i would also ask the same question about what happened to Daniel Pelka. This level of failure and incompetence is not exclusive to this type of crime.
I mentioned underfunding as one of many possible hypotheses, which can often be attributed to failures and negligence. Whether that is justified is another matter.
You’ve said the report cites ethnicity, does it cite immigration?
The report specifically criticised the authorities for its inaction over fears of being labelled racist and ‘raising community tensions’. By this definition, ethnicity is a central focus of the report.
It mentions that they were non-UK residents and in some cases, asylum seekers rather than second generation immigrants. The perpetrators were mostly new arrivals. If this isn’t a damning failure of the immigration system, what is?