Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Match Thread Coventry v Watford (2 Viewers)

  • Thread starter AFCCOVENTRY
  • Start date Feb 3, 2021
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • …
  • 45
Next
First Prev 3 of 45 Next Last

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 3, 2021
  • #71
cc84cov said:
Just like you did from Baka to max ?
Click to expand...
Yeah, I've already held my hands up on that one
 
Reactions: Otis and cc84cov

Johhny Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 4, 2021
  • #72
AFCCOVENTRY said:
Kyle is back tomorrow at training after completing self isolation.
Click to expand...
PLEASE can we call him “McFadz”. Every time I read “Kyle” I get dry heaves and start to sweat
 
Reactions: TewkesburySkyBlue, Frostie, TomRad85 and 2 others
M

Magwitch

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 4, 2021
  • #73
Having McFadz back is okay but who for ? our back three fully fit isn’t the problem any three from the four it’s further up the park where our problems lie, any result for us Saturday is a bonus I don’t expect one to be honest, but Watford will beat most if not all the teams below us sounds like the QPR match was one of those games and Watford nowhere near full strength so as I said anything will do.
 
Last edited: Feb 4, 2021
Reactions: Rugby Sky Blue

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 4, 2021
  • #74
Magwitch said:
Having McFadz back is okay but who for ? our back three fully fit isn’t the problem any three from the four it’s further up the park where our problems lie, any result for us Saturday is a bonus I don’t expect one to be honest, but Watford will beat most if not all the teams below us sounds like the QPR match was one of those games and Watford nowhere near full strength so as I said anything will do.
Click to expand...

Our back line is definitely the problem. Without three individual errors from them Tuesday we win 1-0.
 
Reactions: DannyThomas_1981, procdoc, fernandopartridge and 1 other person

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 4, 2021
  • #75
shmmeee said:
Our back line is definitely the problem. Without three individual errors from them Tuesday we win 1-0.
Click to expand...

same against Blues without conceding another stupid penalty.
 
Reactions: DannyThomas_1981
P

PVA

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 4, 2021
  • #76
Magwitch said:
Having McFadz back is okay but who for ? our back three fully fit isn’t the problem any three from the four it’s further up the park where our problems lie, any result for us Saturday is a bonus I don’t expect one to be honest, but Watford will beat most if not all the teams below us sounds like the QPR match was one of those games and Watford nowhere near full strength so as I said anything will do.
Click to expand...

I think Hyam needs a rest.

Not sure whether Rose is fit enough to complete 90 minutes (unlikely I'd guess) though so it'll be Osti/Fadz/Hyam unless he goes 4 at the back then it could be Osti and Fadz.
 
M

Magwitch

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 4, 2021
  • #77
shmmeee said:
Our back line is definitely the problem. Without three individual errors from them Tuesday we win 1-0.
Click to expand...
For the first Forest goal we had a flat back four are you saying either Osti or Hyam was at fault ?
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 4, 2021
  • #78
Magwitch said:
For the first Forest goal we had a flat back four are you saying either Osti or Hyam was at fault ?
Click to expand...

it was clearly Pask. He's part of the defence.
 
Reactions: Pete in Portugal, Colin Steins Smile and shmmeee

cc84cov

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 4, 2021
  • #79
Take a boring point against Watford going into a game with Cardiff we can surely win
 
Reactions: Colin Steins Smile, PUSB-We_are_going_up, Sky_Blue_Daz and 1 other person

Johhny Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 4, 2021
  • #80
shmmeee said:
Our back line is definitely the problem. Without three individual errors from them Tuesday we win 1-0.
Click to expand...
Without all of the goals against us this year we’d be on top
 
Reactions: mark_ccfc and cc84cov

Mcbean

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 4, 2021
  • #81
Another big team a bit of luck , a penalty for us and three points - stay positive PUSB
 

edgy

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 4, 2021
  • #82
Mcbean said:
Another big team a bit of luck , a penalty for us and three points - stay positive PUSB
Click to expand...

Lol.
 

ccfcricoh

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 4, 2021
  • #83
Mcbean said:
Another big team a bit of luck , a penalty for us and three points - stay positive PUSB
Click to expand...

What is this you speak of?
 
Reactions: oakey and lordy_87

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 4, 2021
  • #84
Not looking forward to this one or any of the games in Feb
 

Mcbean

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 4, 2021
  • #85
ccfcricoh said:
What is this you speak of?
Click to expand...
I speak of heresy infidel - a penalty actually awarded to us for the RSPCC OH !
 
M

Macca

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 4, 2021
  • #86
Park the bus for February
 

NortonSkyBlue

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 4, 2021
  • #87
cc84cov said:
Take a boring point against Watford going into a game with Cardiff we can surely win
Click to expand...
So can Cardiff...
 

cc84cov

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 4, 2021
  • #88
riyadhskyblue said:
So can Cardiff...
Click to expand...
Aren’t they bottom of the form table ?
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 4, 2021
  • #89
Magwitch said:
For the first Forest goal we had a flat back four are you saying either Osti or Hyam was at fault ?
Click to expand...

It was Pask, though there’s a good argument the CBS/DMs didn’t track their men.
 

Sky Blue Harry H

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 4, 2021
  • #90
David O'Day said:
Not looking forward to this one or any of the games in Feb
Click to expand...

Potentially like a prolonged visit to the dentist - hopefully not!
 
L

Legia Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 4, 2021
  • #91
I think MR will start with the team that started the 2nd half against Forest. Having got those minutes under his belt there would seem little point in sending Rose back to the much less competitive U23 games. If he is not ready for the full 90, then bring on McFadzean after 60 minutes, or whenever its deemed Rose needs to be rested.
 
Reactions: oakey

Offhegoes

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 4, 2021
  • #92
With Sheaf likely out, and the 2nd half performance against Forest he has to go back to the wing back system. I'd bring back iMcFadz to try and deal with Deeney, and Rose for Hyam, but almost certain he won't do that. Therefore....

Marosi
Ostigaard McFadz Hyam
Da Costa James Hamer McCallum
O'Hare
Biamou Gyokeres
 
Reactions: oakey, standupforcity, PUSB-We_are_going_up and 2 others

Esoterica

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 4, 2021
  • #93
The 2nd half against Forest was our entire season in a nutshell. Concede an avoidable goal, have 20 crosses to no-one and not look like actually scoring despite a fair share of possession. Wouldn't be surprised if we have the worst 'cross to goal ratio' in the league.

Going back to 3-5-2 as we play it will force all our play out wide again, neuter O'Hare, limit how many bodies we get forward from midfield and highlight how weak in the air our strikers are.

As you can tell, yesterday's bad feeling about this game is still here
 
Reactions: Saddlebrains and PUSB-We_are_going_up

Colin Steins Smile

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 4, 2021
  • #94
I'm guessing we will play one up front. Not my recommendation, but just my guess. I think he might play Shipley with the thought to support McCallum.

So I think the team will be:
Marosi
Rose Ostigaard Hyam
Da Costa James Hamer McCallum
O'Hare Shipley
Gyokeres
 
S

steve101

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 4, 2021
  • #95
Interesting that both new signings Reid and Kavares didn't feature at all for the U23s today. I wouldn't be surprised if they both are on the bench for Saturday. Unless they are trying to keep separate bubbles in light of the two COVID cases.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 4, 2021
  • #96
Esoterica said:
The 2nd half against Forest was our entire season in a nutshell. Concede an avoidable goal, have 20 crosses to no-one and not look like actually scoring despite a fair share of possession. Wouldn't be surprised if we have the worst 'cross to goal ratio' in the league.

Going back to 3-5-2 as we play it will force all our play out wide again, neuter O'Hare, limit how many bodies we get forward from midfield and highlight how weak in the air our strikers are.

As you can tell, yesterday's bad feeling about this game is still here
Click to expand...

How about:

Maroši
Østigård Rose McFadz McCallum
Hamer James Sheaf
Dacosta Györkeres O’Hare

(not even sure if serious. I think we can make the back four work, but without Sheaf the rest doesn’t look great and it’s be a shame to drop Dacosta after a good performance (I know you don’t think it was but still)
 

speedie87

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 4, 2021
  • #97
I’d play 3421 for this one

gyo up top and ohare and bagpaga in behind. Whenever watched Watford they are quite lazy and don’t close players down and players are left in space feeding it into them two to turn and run at them would be my tactics
 
Reactions: PUSB-We_are_going_up
R

Rugby Sky Blue

Active Member
  • Feb 5, 2021
  • #98
I had a quick look on their forum and they seem to be suggesting that their manager will change the line up due to injuries.I didn't realise Watford had signed Philip Zinkernagel, he is supposed to be shit hot was statistically something like the 5 most creative player in the Europe last season, a lot of Watford fans suggesting that this is the game they start him in.
 
Reactions: steve101

cc84cov

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 5, 2021
  • #99
Nearly 24 hours to go
 

Philosoraptor

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 5, 2021
  • #100
 
Reactions: Briles

Philosoraptor

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 5, 2021
  • #101

 

Covcraig@bury

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 5, 2021
  • #102
3-1 win
 

mark_ccfc

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 5, 2021
  • #103
cc84cov said:
Aren’t they bottom of the form table ?
Click to expand...
That will soon change when they play us
 
Reactions: PUSB-We_are_going_up
P

PVA

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 5, 2021
  • #104
Robins says we only have 20 fit players.

So Reid and Tavares will almost certainly be on the bench

edit: actually having counted up one of them may miss out.

I make it 17 first teamers. Billson will be GK sub so 18, which leaves 2 from Tavares, Reid and Bapaga.
 
Reactions: PUSB-We_are_going_up

AOM

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 5, 2021
  • #105
PVA said:
Robins says we only have 20 fit players.

So Reid and Tavares will almost certainly be on the bench

edit: actually having counted up one of them may miss out.
Click to expand...

Are we missing anyone extra since Wednesday? I assume Sheaf is out
 
Reactions: pw362
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • …
  • 45
Next
First Prev 3 of 45 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 3 (members: 0, guests: 3)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?