Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • General Discussion
  • Off Topic Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Coronavirus Thread (Off Topic, Politics) (26 Viewers)

  • Thread starter BackRoomRummermill
  • Start date Feb 23, 2020
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 911
  • 912
  • 913
  • 914
  • 915
  • …
  • 1666
Next
First Prev 913 of 1666 Next Last

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 19, 2020
  • #31,921
Nick said:
Have you been in a gym?

My gym is cleaner than most hospitals.
Click to expand...

My mates gym has inspectors round first week they reopened. Wonder if the pubs are getting that scrutiny?
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 19, 2020
  • #31,922
ajsccfc said:
I think for the most part gyms are ok, pubs try to be but you can't account for people's behaviour with booze at the best of times so they'd be first in my list
Click to expand...

But taking customers names (when you can remember) on individual scrap pieces of paper lying in a puddle of spilt beer on the bar probably isn't the ideal way to run track and trace!
 
Reactions: ajsccfc
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 19, 2020
  • #31,923
Deleted member 5849 said:
I'd count as having an underlying health condition, but would otherwise be seen as healthy. It's an underlying health condition that's not visible or obvious, wouldn't have me shielded or kept off work, but would otherwise be a tick in a box.


View attachment 16967

That's what it's about.
Click to expand...

What do you do every winter when the usual suspects are abundant?
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Sep 19, 2020
  • #31,924
clint van damme said:
My mates gym has inspectors round first week they reopened. Wonder if the pubs are getting that scrutiny?
Click to expand...
Doubt it. Same as supermarkets again.
 
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 19, 2020
  • #31,925
skybluetony176 said:
Sorry. But they need to shut pubs and gyms again. And as a result of the main demographic that seems to be spreading it. Close the schools vs closing pubs and gyms doesn’t really need discussion. It’s ultimately our children that are the generation that’s going to have to pay the biggest price of this pandemic regardless so let’s at least give them the best possible education under the circumstances to do that.
Click to expand...

Then let me teach them properly rather than in random rooms confined to a box
 
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 19, 2020
  • #31,926
Sky_Blue_Dreamer said:
With the Xmas thing I wonder if they'll be suggesting not to send cards/presents just in case. Certainly telling people not to lick the envelopes anyway.
Click to expand...

Or alternatively put all correspondence into an autoclave
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Sep 19, 2020
  • #31,927
Brighton Sky Blue said:
What do you do every winter when the usual suspects are abundant?
Click to expand...
Well there isn't that massive peak of excess deaths, there despite measures being brought in to combat it, too.

Bit of a flippant reply really.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Sep 19, 2020
  • #31,928
Nick said:
Have you been in a gym?

My gym is cleaner than most hospitals. Bottles of spray and wipes next to everything and people cleaning after use as well as staff doing laps cleaning.
Click to expand...
Proper inspection of places could be the way forward, anyway. Certain places seem to be more cautious than others, so they should maybe be allowed to stay open ahead of those who aren't as bothered.
 
W

wingy

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 19, 2020
  • #31,929
The spin is getting pretty obvious.
We won't lockdown.
We don't want to lockdown .
Big pow wow at Chequers over the weekend.
Maybe two weeks over half term.
He will have to overcome stiff resistance within his own party Lol.

Reality ,it may require a lockdown to bring it back into containment , it may need 3 weeks and it may be needed earlier than a rigid target set in the near future .
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 19, 2020
  • #31,930
Nick said:
Have you been in a gym?

My gym is cleaner than most hospitals. Bottles of spray and wipes next to everything and people cleaning after use as well as staff doing laps cleaning.
Click to expand...
I don’t care how clean it is, it’s an air born virus too and people puffing and panting in close proximity too each other is a risk. If it’s a choice between you going to the gym and my children going to the school you ain’t going to the gym.
 
Reactions: Sky_Blue_Dreamer and Ian1779
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 19, 2020
  • #31,931
Deleted member 5849 said:
Well there isn't that massive peak of excess deaths, there despite measures being brought in to combat it, too.

Bit of a flippant reply really.
Click to expand...

The death rate always picks up every winter so it’s not flippant, there are other unpleasant viruses around as well every year which will cause symptoms in nearly everyone who catch them as opposed to this one that makes a very high % asymptomatic. I may also be ‘acting flippant’ as some here are proposing that schools of 2000 on site be allowed to remain open with loads of households mixing and then wonder why the rate is going up. I will almost certainly get it between now and Christmas but have no option to refuse to go in.

Then ADM has suggested making us go in under these conditions and have us all kept inside for half term. Forgive me for ‘acting flippant’ under such circumstances
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 19, 2020
  • #31,932
Same with pubs. All the ones around us seem to be laying bands on to get people in. You then get a load of people shouting in each other’s faces to have a conversation.
Can’t help but feel that some joined up thinking not just from the government but also local authorities and landlords too could have delayed us getting to this point again or at least so quickly.
 
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 19, 2020
  • #31,933
skybluetony176 said:
Same with pubs. All the ones around us seem to be laying bands on to get people in. You then get a load of people shouting in each other’s faces to have a conversation.
Can’t help but feel that some joined up thinking not just from the government but also local authorities and landlords too could have delayed us getting to this point again or at least so quickly.
Click to expand...

All of the precautions insisted on are happening because so many people don’t even get symptoms. Which in itself should be telling us something.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Sep 19, 2020
  • #31,934
Brighton Sky Blue said:
The death rate always picks up every winter so it’s not flippant, there are other unpleasant viruses around as well every year which will cause symptoms in nearly everyone who catch them as opposed to this one that makes a very high % asymptomatic. I may also be ‘acting flippant’ as some here are proposing that schools of 2000 on site be allowed to remain open with loads of households mixing and then wonder why the rate is going up. I will almost certainly get it between now and Christmas but have no option to refuse to go in.

Then ADM has suggested making us go in under these conditions and have us all kept inside for half term. Forgive me for ‘acting flippant’ under such circumstances
Click to expand...
tbf, both Ian and I among others have pointed out that the risk from schools is passing on to others less able to deal with it.

It is flippant when there was an obvious, discernable, large boost above the average death rate. It's flippant and slightly insulting not to me, but people I care about who I have to worry about, too. It may be survival of the fittest, and I've already pointed out it is nature's way of saying we're over--populated, that there is an argument to let it do its thing... but to reduce it to a 'who cares' (which is how it's coming out, altgough I'm sure you don't intend that) is not helping my mood... You're not, after all, the only person who has to go in to places, and has no option but to go, and can't refuse to go in. If they almost certainly get it between now and Christmas, I'd rather them not be reduced to 'well they had underlying health issues' if that's all the same.
 
Last edited by a moderator: Sep 19, 2020
Reactions: Sick Boy, shmmeee, chiefdave and 2 others
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 19, 2020
  • #31,935
Deleted member 5849 said:
tbf, both Ian and I among others have pointed out that the risk from schools is passing on to others less able to deal with it.

It is flippant when there was an obvious, discernable, large boost above the average death rate. It's flippant and slightly insulting not to me, but people I care about who I have to worry about, too. It may be survival of the fittest, and I've already pointed out it is nature's way of saying we're over--populated, that there is an argument to let it do its thing... but to reduce it to a 'who cares' (which is how it's coming out, altgough I'm sure you don't intend that) is not helping my mood... You're not, after all, the only person who has to go in to places, and has no option but to go, and can't refuse to go in. If they almost certainly get it between now and Christmas, I'd rather them not be reduced to 'well they had underlying health issues' if that's all the same.
Click to expand...

It’s because I can’t provide a good education under these measures but everyone is saying how kids need to have access to one at this time. Remote learning earlier this year took my mental health through the ringer and this is doing it again. It is not just me but the proposals will make it so it’s just my profession.

All I’m really asking is to let me go over and help students and to let me do practical work with them.
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 19, 2020
  • #31,936
skybluetony176 said:
I don’t care how clean it is, it’s an air born virus too and people puffing and panting in close proximity too each other is a risk. If it’s a choice between you going to the gym and my children going to the school you ain’t going to the gym.
Click to expand...

Indeed. It's an indoor setting where the exertion will lead to heavy breathing and thus a far larger potential range of infection and viral load. But I'd shut them after the pubs because after a few beers inhibitions are gone and distancing etc goes out the window. At least in gyms the likelihood is everyone will remain vigilant.

However, shutting the pubs would be way more unpopular than shutting the gyms so I think we all know which is most likely to happen under Johnson.
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 19, 2020
  • #31,937
Brighton Sky Blue said:
The death rate always picks up every winter so it’s not flippant, there are other unpleasant viruses around as well every year which will cause symptoms in nearly everyone who catch them as opposed to this one that makes a very high % asymptomatic. I may also be ‘acting flippant’ as some here are proposing that schools of 2000 on site be allowed to remain open with loads of households mixing and then wonder why the rate is going up. I will almost certainly get it between now and Christmas but have no option to refuse to go in.

Then ADM has suggested making us go in under these conditions and have us all kept inside for half term. Forgive me for ‘acting flippant’ under such circumstances
Click to expand...

We've no idea how someone who has had Covid will be if they pick up colds and flu over the winter as their lung capacity may have been affected and they struggle to get enough oxygen due to damaged lungs. And that may not be just the vulnerable - plenty of young, healthy people are saying that even months later they're still struggling with physical exertion. It could be argued those that have had Covid are now part of the vulnerable sector because they may have lung damage.

So even though Covid itself may not be strong enough to kill a young healthy person it could massively increase their susceptibility to other complications further on, or even premature death.

We seem to have a lot of people being blase about a situation we have no idea what the long term effects will be.
 

Alan Dugdales Moustache

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 19, 2020
  • #31,938
Grendel said:
You wouldnt notice any difference if they closed the town centre anyway
Click to expand...
I would. I can buy a nearly new suit there for £5.
 
Reactions: Grendel

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 19, 2020
  • #31,939
Alan Dugdales Moustache said:
I would. I can buy a nearly new suit there for £5.
Click to expand...

Youve been ripped off - must have seen you coming
 
Reactions: Alan Dugdales Moustache

Alan Dugdales Moustache

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 19, 2020
  • #31,940
Deleted member 5849 said:
tbf, both Ian and I among others have pointed out that the risk from schools is passing on to others less able to deal with it.

It is flippant when there was an obvious, discernable, large boost above the average death rate. It's flippant and slightly insulting not to me, but people I care about who I have to worry about, too. It may be survival of the fittest, and I've already pointed out it is nature's way of saying we're over--populated, that there is an argument to let it do its thing... but to reduce it to a 'who cares' (which is how it's coming out, altgough I'm sure you don't intend that) is not helping my mood... You're not, after all, the only person who has to go in to places, and has no option but to go, and can't refuse to go in. If they almost certainly get it between now and Christmas, I'd rather them not be reduced to 'well they had underlying health issues' if that's all the same.
Click to expand...
I've just heard that Wolson Grange care home is now shutting to all visitors for a month as a member of staff has just tested positive. It's a big care home and they've gone out of their way in the last few months to protect everyone. I feel really sorry for all concerned.
 
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 19, 2020
  • #31,941
Sky_Blue_Dreamer said:
We've no idea how someone who has had Covid will be if they pick up colds and flu over the winter as their lung capacity may have been affected and they struggle to get enough oxygen due to damaged lungs. And that may not be just the vulnerable - plenty of young, healthy people are saying that even months later they're still struggling with physical exertion. It could be argued those that have had Covid are now part of the vulnerable sector because they may have lung damage.

So even though Covid itself may not be strong enough to kill a young healthy person it could massively increase their susceptibility to other complications further on, or even premature death.

We seem to have a lot of people being blase about a situation we have no idea what the long term effects will be.
Click to expand...

I have complied in turning the classroom into an operating theatre and I don't go out of my box. I wear my non-clinically tested mask over my face that makes it hard to breathe around the school and getting to and from it. I also defend regulations I don't agree with to the students who have all noticed the contradictions in them. The surge in cases is being blamed on irresponsible young people when it's more likely a consequence of reopening schools. For each young person that falls ill with it, many more catch it and experience nothing.

Though I guess I'm not allowed to be unhappy with it or to complain. Now I am being told I must simultaneously deliver in classroom teaching and remote learning for those who are off for any reason and not just COVID self-isolation. I agree I can come across as being churlish but it's a reflection of where I'm at with my state of mind as both of us in the house are in the same position.
 

Alan Dugdales Moustache

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 19, 2020
  • #31,942
Grendel said:
Youve been ripped off - must have seen you coming
Click to expand...
I haggled and got it down from £8. I thought I'd got a bargain.
 

Alan Dugdales Moustache

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 19, 2020
  • #31,943
Sky_Blue_Dreamer said:
We've no idea how someone who has had Covid will be if they pick up colds and flu over the winter as their lung capacity may have been affected and they struggle to get enough oxygen due to damaged lungs. And that may not be just the vulnerable - plenty of young, healthy people are saying that even months later they're still struggling with physical exertion. It could be argued those that have had Covid are now part of the vulnerable sector because they may have lung damage.

So even though Covid itself may not be strong enough to kill a young healthy person it could massively increase their susceptibility to other complications further on, or even premature death.

We seem to have a lot of people being blase about a situation we have no idea what the long term effects will be.
Click to expand...
Can anyone imagine the clamour for tests when the normal winter coughs and colds kick in ? It'll make the present lottery look thoroughly organised .
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Sep 19, 2020
  • #31,944
Alan Dugdales Moustache said:
Can anyone imagine the clamour for tests when the normal winter coughs and colds kick in ? It'll make the present lottery look thoroughly organised .
Click to expand...
 

Alan Dugdales Moustache

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 19, 2020
  • #31,945
Brighton Sky Blue said:
Then let me teach them properly rather than in random rooms confined to a box
Click to expand...
Im thinking that as we are in unprecedented times the govt should just change the half term holidays to coincide with a lockdown, rather than the other way round. It might be impossible to put into action but what we don't need is a situation where we might have a short, sharp lockdown, the kids then go back to school for one week and then are off on holidays for another week. That would be stupid.
No doubt it would fuck up people's holiday plans etc but anyone who books a holiday now is asking for it !
 
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 19, 2020
  • #31,946
Alan Dugdales Moustache said:
Im thinking that as we are in unprecedented times the govt should just change the half term holidays to coincide with a lockdown, rather than the other way round. It might be impossible to put into action but what we don't need is a situation where we might have a short, sharp lockdown, the kids then go back to school for one week and then are off on holidays for another week. That would be stupid.
No doubt it would fuck up people's holiday plans etc but anyone who books a holiday now is asking for it !
Click to expand...

You could but we've only been back for a few weeks and we would then be left with an enormous time between the earlier half term and Christmas. My view is if you want to do that, lock everything else down but let schools run under normal conditions. I would then mind less having to simultaneously teach remotely if in the classroom I was giving normal lessons.
 

Alan Dugdales Moustache

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 19, 2020
  • #31,947
Brighton Sky Blue said:
You could but we've only been back for a few weeks and we would then be left with an enormous time between the earlier half term and Christmas. My view is if you want to do that, lock everything else down but let schools run under normal conditions. I would then mind less having to simultaneously teach remotely if in the classroom I was giving normal lessons.
Click to expand...
Having thought about the idea I'm dismissing it as unworkable, what with childcare planning etc. It seemed a good idea for about 15 minutes.
 
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 19, 2020
  • #31,948
Alan Dugdales Moustache said:
Having thought about the idea I'm dismissing it as unworkable, what with childcare planning etc. It seemed a good idea for about 15 minutes.
Click to expand...

At least you're trying to think of something, I don't think the powers that be are. I do agree that children have a right to the best education they can receive (that's why I do the job!), but they aren't getting it right now. I also have little faith that teachers would get priority shopping access in the case of a schools-exempt nationwide lockdown though it's the least of my concerns right now
 
C

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 19, 2020
  • #31,949
Sky_Blue_Dreamer said:
Indeed. It's an indoor setting where the exertion will lead to heavy breathing and thus a far larger potential range of infection and viral load.
Click to expand...

Wondered what you were talking about for a minute SBD
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 19, 2020
  • #31,950
Brighton Sky Blue said:
You could but we've only been back for a few weeks and we would then be left with an enormous time between the earlier half term and Christmas. My view is if you want to do that, lock everything else down but let schools run under normal conditions. I would then mind less having to simultaneously teach remotely if in the classroom I was giving normal lessons.
Click to expand...
Surely that could be easily solved by having another week off in early November, take a week of the other holidays if you're worried about losing a week.
Alan Dugdales Moustache said:
Having thought about the idea I'm dismissing it as unworkable, what with childcare planning etc. It seemed a good idea for about 15 minutes.
Click to expand...
Is that not an issue anyway with years, or even entire schools, being sent home for 2 weeks with no notice?
 
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 19, 2020
  • #31,951
chiefdave said:
Surely that could be easily solved by having another week off in early November, take a week of the other holidays if you're worried about losing a week.
Click to expand...

Possibly but then you're just taking holiday off elsewhere. And again it's meaningless if when I'm in I'm not allowed to teach properly.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 19, 2020
  • #31,952
skybluetony176 said:
Close the schools vs closing pubs and gyms doesn’t really need discussion.
Click to expand...
It seems odd to me how the goalposts get moved so regularly without much mention. We had months of experts saying that to open schools up for the new term would need something to be closed to compensate, even if the R was stable. Yet when we get to the start of term we open schools up despite the fact the R is rising and don't shut anything else down.

Same with people saying schools are breeding grounds for germs. Flat denial for months and now that the kids have gone back people are talking about how there's always a big rise in flu etc when the kids go back.

Whatever happened to the covid alert system and that weird graph that showed it was safe to open schools when the R dropped below 1? They both seem to have been binned now they don't line up with what the government wants to do.
 
Reactions: skybluetony176

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 19, 2020
  • #31,953
Alan Dugdales Moustache said:
Im thinking that as we are in unprecedented times the govt should just change the half term holidays to coincide with a lockdown, rather than the other way round. It might be impossible to put into action but what we don't need is a situation where we might have a short, sharp lockdown, the kids then go back to school for one week and then are off on holidays for another week. That would be stupid.
No doubt it would fuck up people's holiday plans etc but anyone who books a holiday now is asking for it !
Click to expand...

I like the thinking behind this although the pitfalls within it are clear. If the rate is increasing massively and requires a lockdown earlier than holiday times it's not going to be as effective in keeping things under control. It would probably be a little bit of a help but maybe not long enough to make enough of a difference.

So the next thought is make the holidays more flexible so lockdown can be introduced when needed without affecting overall time in school, but this makes it impossible to plan for with parents needing time off etc at short notice (although if it were lockdown they may arguably be at home anyway but would depend on the job and would most likely be a disadvatage to poorer families) It adds strain onto teachers as kids start to learn something then have a few weeks off and the topic needs to be redone and you effectively need to teach the syllabus to them twice.

The initial idea was supposed to be shut things down to allow schools to open which would be sensible but unpopular and has the that once you knew the kids were going back to school there would be a massive rush to go to the pub etc before they shut, and if you opened them during half term or whatever again the rush to get there during that short window would be problematic.

Perhaps a sort of timeshare should have been considered to enable both to continue operating to some degree so schools and businesses like pubs open alternately, say three weeks in school, two weeks out with summer holidays shortened as a result to try and reduce this clamour. Kids continue to get an education but economic reality is also given consideration. It wouldn't be ideal for either but would be a compromise, but this would've needed enough time so teachers and parents could plan ahead for this, so isn't feasible now.
 

Ian1779

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 19, 2020
  • #31,954
Sky_Blue_Dreamer said:
I like the thinking behind this although the pitfalls within it are clear. If the rate is increasing massively and requires a lockdown earlier than holiday times it's not going to be as effective in keeping things under control. It would probably be a little bit of a help but maybe not long enough to make enough of a difference.

So the next thought is make the holidays more flexible so lockdown can be introduced when needed without affecting overall time in school, but this makes it impossible to plan for with parents needing time off etc at short notice (although if it were lockdown they may arguably be at home anyway but would depend on the job and would most likely be a disadvatage to poorer families) It adds strain onto teachers as kids start to learn something then have a few weeks off and the topic needs to be redone and you effectively need to teach the syllabus to them twice.

The initial idea was supposed to be shut things down to allow schools to open which would be sensible but unpopular and has the that once you knew the kids were going back to school there would be a massive rush to go to the pub etc before they shut, and if you opened them during half term or whatever again the rush to get there during that short window would be problematic.

Perhaps a sort of timeshare should have been considered to enable both to continue operating to some degree so schools and businesses like pubs open alternately, say three weeks in school, two weeks out with summer holidays shortened as a result to try and reduce this clamour. Kids continue to get an education but economic reality is also given consideration. It wouldn't be ideal for either but would be a compromise, but this would've needed enough time so teachers and parents could plan ahead for this, so isn't feasible now.
Click to expand...

The reality of taking time out of the summer break is a non starter. Ofqual haven't even decided what they are doing about next summers exams yet (will they delay till late June/early - and still won’t for another month at the earliest.

Lost time for kids in Y11 and Y13 can’t in reality be clawed back, such is the timeline if they do complete exams.

The entire structure is inflexible (and outdated IMO). There would need to be a complete overhaul of the system - and the people in charge can’t even deliver on Cov-ID tests.
 

covmark

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 19, 2020
  • #31,955
skybluetony176 said:
I don’t care how clean it is, it’s an air born virus too and people puffing and panting in close proximity too each other is a risk. If it’s a choice between you going to the gym and my children going to the school you ain’t going to the gym.
Click to expand...
Have you been to the gym?

Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk
 
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 911
  • 912
  • 913
  • 914
  • 915
  • …
  • 1666
Next
First Prev 913 of 1666 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 21 (members: 0, guests: 21)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • General Discussion
  • Off Topic Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?