mark82
Super Moderator
Complete Malakas.
And keep us Greeks out if it thank you :joyful:
What if they catch it at work, the supermarket or the bus?
If they are then going into an on people's home or visiting vulnerable people, then I can understand it.
I'll still be playing football on Friday and going to the pub (if they are open). I won't be seeing any old or vulnerable people.
What if they catch it at work, the supermarket or the bus? What if they get it from running for toilet roll.
If they are then going into an on people's home or visiting vulnerable people, then I can understand it.
I'll still be playing football on Friday and going to the pub (if they are open). I won't be seeing any old or vulnerable people.
More good work from Boris:
What if they catch it at work, the supermarket or the bus? What if they get it from running for toilet roll.
If they are then going into an on people's home or visiting vulnerable people, then I can understand it.
I'll still be playing football on Friday and going to the pub (if they are open). I won't be seeing any old or vulnerable people.
Not quite the same as on the bus or on a football pitch is it. You do what you want, but I'd say 5,500 people up close & sweaty is pretty fucking stupid and pretty fucking selfish right at this point in time.
?You are actually next to 5,500 wow
You want all cafes and pubs to close anyway so what do you care
Then you’re an eejit. We are trying to limit contact as much as possible because the fewer people moving the slower the disease spreads. Don’t be a knob. Stay at home. Birds won’t shag you cos you aren’t scared of the virus.
Read the second paragraph of the tweet.
Agree with this PVA. Not sure why they don’t just say that all bars, restaurants and clubs will need to close from immediately/X date
ps the 7 day and 14 day isolation was explained clearly though
Such an unbelievably ignorant stance to take.
'I won't be seeing any vulnerable people after I've been to the pub/gig so who cares'
This is why a definitive decision was needed, not the halfway house we got, to stop the selfish and ignorant people from making the situation worse.
Seems likely.I know I’m replying to my own post !
Just been speaking to someone far more intelligent than me (and defo not a Johnson fan) who said actually the psychology around this is quite interesting. By not formally banning certain behaviours you almost hope to get the individual make the decision (and buy into the process by the time you might need to ban) thereby hopefully keeping more people onboard for longer.
Id not really considered this but kind of makes sense I suppose...think about the reaction last week as to why we weren’t already stopping/banning certain things such as public gatherings, many were almost willing the government to undertake more draconian actions/steps.
Just thought I’d share the theory (feel free to ignore)
12 weeks eh for limited contact.
That kind of messes up my wedding... might be quite a minimal gathering, if anybody at all!!!
Wish ours was small- saved a fortune12 weeks eh for limited contact.
That kind of messes up my wedding... might be quite a minimal gathering, if anybody at all!!!
Seems likely.
But why ?
Seems likely.
But why ?
Nope! Might hold it via Skype!Pa did you manage to at least have your stag do ???
He just wants to believe he is write in the face of evidenceYou want all cafes and pubs to close anyway so what do you care
But why not just be direct .So people buy into the requests for longer I guess, which helps soften the peak for longer, buys more time for NHS etc etc
He just wants to believe he is write in the face of evidence
Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk
But why not just be direct .
The discourse , uncertainty and distraction from the focus seems pretty wasteful.
Nuanced mind games could create unnecessary hysteria.
Just a theory Wingy, might not be correct at all (interesting that a number of western countries are almost doing it in this way though - appreciate Italy probably didn’t have the opportunity !). China/eastern countries can be stricter and the people probably a little more obedient !
Quite, like your friend it had occurred to me .Just a theory Wingy, might not be correct at all (interesting that a number of western countries are almost doing it in this way though - appreciate Italy probably didn’t have the opportunity). China/eastern countries can be stricter and the people probably a little more obedient !
It better be bloody right.It is interesting, not sure its right though.
Many decades ago now in my degree we studied the behaviour of people in disasters, particularly the Kings Cross & Bradford City fires- a lot of people died there because they were literally afraid of 'breaking the perceived rules' and going onto the tracks or just going onto the pitch etc, the power of compliance with pre-established 'rules' is very powerful no matter how dire the situation is. That was a different time though I guess, society moves on. Another pretty established fact is that in times of crisis people want to be led, they want to be strongly told what to do & what not to do. What we have here is someone appears to be someone saying "do what you want, but be careful, you're taking your chances". Maybe this is another clever experimental approach, who knows.
Then you’re an eejit. We are trying to limit contact as much as possible because the fewer people moving the slower the disease spreads. Don’t be a knob. Stay at home. Birds won’t shag you cos you aren’t scared of the virus.
But going to work or to the supermarket are much more necessary tasks than going to a gig ffs!
Honestly I don't get why this is so hard to understand that large gatherings/crowds are not a good idea.
Haven't read everything posted since I've been out at work but looks like folks may have missed that Dave Boddy is self-isolating in precaution as he's just been on holiday in Spain for a week. Aside from him keeping clear of the team, manager and the club, why is our Chief Exec taking a holiday abroad during the most important part of the season ?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?