“As we prevent three deaths by vaccinating, we incur two deaths” Robert Mallone
one piece of your “evidence"
"Pfizer vaccine does not work" scientific director of Pfizer Michael Yeadon
one piece of your “evidence"
"Pfizer vaccine does not work" scientific director of Pfizer Michael Yeadon
I don't know if you are aware that there are literally hundreds of scientists who do not agree with the vaccine program. Some of them are the ONLY Nobel prize winners in the field of immunology. As I said MY family are more important to me than your family are, don't be so arrogant to think otherwise.
Most of his research (although money orientated) was based on the study of Prof Michael Levitt.
Complete bollocks. His opinion based on nothing that’s never been peer tested against a tsunami of evidence to the contrary from almost every virologist in the world that has been peer tested.“As we prevent three deaths by vaccinating, we incur two deaths” Robert Mallone
So you already know he’s a crank yet you still chose to believe him.That's right!
That's correct
The guy who won the Nobel prize for his coding? Why would you believe him over those who are experts in the actual area in question?Most of his research (although money orientated) was based on the study of Prof Michael Levitt.
You should discredit wherever you you read this from simply for the fact that claims he’s a director of Pfizer. He isn’t. If they can’t even get a basic like that correct why would you entertain believing it.one piece of your “evidence"
"Pfizer vaccine does not work" scientific director of Pfizer Michael Yeadon
That’s the same Michael Levitt. One thing of note, he won the Nobel prize as part of a team. The others don’t share his view. If you’re using his prize to legitimise his in peer tested opinion then you have to apply the same logic to the others who won it with him, then the sensible thing to do would be to make a simple calculation of weight of numbers which tells you that the majority of his team think he’s wrong, therefore he’s wrong.No, I meann the Professor Michael Levitt, the biophysicist at Stanford University who won the Nobel Prize for Chemistry.
one piece of your “evidence"
"Pfizer vaccine does not work" scientific director of Pfizer Michael Yeadon
No, I meann the Professor Michael Levitt, the biophysicist at Stanford University who won the Nobel Prize for Chemistry.
Like I said. The rest of the team that won that prize don’t share his opinion. Weight of numbers tell you he’s wrong.Regardless, erring on the side of caution, I would rather listen to the advice of a biophysicist at Stanford University who won the Nobel Prize for Chemistry, than to some of the mainstream media. Wouldn't you? It's only common sense.
Pharma science is science. The clue is in the title.I trust science, not pharma science. There are no experts.
The guy has nothing of substance. All he has is a misunderstood opinion that falls down with a minuscule amount of questioning. He’s absolutely a crank and you really don’t have to look into his opinions very hard to understand that.Crank? What on earth are you talking about? If you have nothing of substance to say, say nothing.
And then the Nobel committee will become part of the woke elite or something and previously strongly held beliefs about the opinions of one Nobel winner will be dropped in favour of something else.The nobel prize is a bit of a red herring, it's pretty likely that the teams that developed vaccines for Pfizer and Astra Zeneca will be nominated for a nobel prize, and rightly so.
I don't do facebook. By the way, did you know that Facebook "fact checkers" have two billion dollars in investments in pharmaceuticals?
Made that point. The rest of the team that won it with him also don’t share his opinion having listened to peer proven evidence.The nobel prize is a bit of a red herring, it's pretty likely that the teams that developed vaccines for Pfizer and Astra Zeneca will be nominated for a nobel prize, and rightly so.
Do you apply this to everything or just covid vaccines?I trust science, not pharma science. There are no experts.
I’ll take that as a no then. So basically 3 discredited scientists that fly in the face of convention with unverified, un peer tested opinions not based on actual facts trump hundreds if not thousands of scientists, many of who are actual experts in the relevant fields, many of whom will have Noble prizes for their work.Ooooh, you got me!
That is a huge stretch any way you look at it. The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation donated $53,501 to factcheck.org. RWJF holds stock in J&J.I don't do facebook. By the way, did you know that Facebook "fact checkers" have two billion dollars in investments in pharmaceuticals?
You've seen it all before because everybody is sick of your shit.I see no real arguments anymore. No rationality, only insults, and appeals through the media from authority. And people like you Liquid Gold and SkyBlueTony, I've read it all before, simplifying and gaslighting arguments to their basest level and giving no real substance. It may be scorn and ridicule now, and yes it's succeeding but what will be the long-term cost? Who's going to stand up and ask the questions if people like you bombard every question with a barrage of bullshit?
This isn't some moral victory mate. You're endangering other people because of some bullshit you've read online you're not qualified to understand.I rest my case
Okay, I'm gonna say this and then I'm done.
DO NOT ALLOW YOUR CHILDREN TO BE VACCINATED!
With respect I’ll take the advice of my daughters consultant with 40 years of medical experience thanks.Okay, I'm gonna say this and then I'm done.
DO NOT ALLOW YOUR CHILDREN TO BE VACCINATED!
With respect I’ll take the advice of my daughters consultant with 40 years of medical experience thanks.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?