Better and more positive. Take it as you see it though
Better and more positive. Take it as you see it though
So what absolute no per 100000 do we think or expect to be sensible or viable for a carefree Christmas in 5 week's time .
Edit:- bearing in mind 10 week's ago it was down to 3 per 100000k when it all kicked off again.
Coombe Abbey they'd closed the car park again. Which meant that cars, who wanted to go there, decided to just stop in the road, rather than carrying on and finding somewhere else.Judging by the state of shops today, people are just meeting in them for a chat instead.
Absolutely rammed everywhere.
Judging by the state of shops today, people are just meeting in them for a chat instead.
Absolutely rammed everywhere.
Pathetic
they've broken their own lockdown rules, misappropriated public funds, bent if not broken the planning laws to deprive a poor London borough of 40 million and been found guilty of bullying since this pandemic started and they haven't apologised for anything.
It should be a national scandal but very few people seem to give a fuck.
Apparently since February,the official stats are that,for those aged 60 or below & with no pre-existIng conditions,there’s only been 339 deaths...and that’s from the national office of statistics too
Again, a pre-existing condition includes asthma, high blood pressure... mental health issues(!)
It really isn't that simple!
My observations from this weekend is that this lockdown is an utter farce. You can even tell the body language is different from the lockdown of Spring. Whether it’s fatigue or cynicism it feels totally different.
It's normal life but the pubs are shut at the moment
The government is about to essentially reset everyone’s expectations so that 20K cases and 400 deaths a day is the new baseline.My observations from this weekend is that this lockdown is an utter farce. You can even tell the body language is different from the lockdown of Spring. Whether it’s fatigue or cynicism it feels totally different.
But it seems it isn't,yet that's how it's being presentedOxford vaccine 70% effective. It's it just me who thinks that isn't very good?
Tbf, there was a professor just in the radio who said that was better than the flu vaccine.But it seems it isn't,yet that's how it's being presented
Given the others all require a double dose to achieve their efficacy threshold,why not measure like for like.
A half dose followed by a full dose achieves the figure of 90% .
Apples with apples.
Editlus it's 20% the cost of the others, doesn't require specialized storage,no one who caught Covid on the test required hospital treatment etc.
May also prevent transmission.
Couldn't be useful to third world countries.Tbf, there was a professor just in the radio who said that was better than the flu vaccine.
Can't get away from the doubt that if we hadn't bought so much of it, we wouldn't be bugging it up so much, however.
That's good. I'd like to know how many of the higher risk groups took part in the trials.no one who caught Covid on the test required hospital treatment etc.
Yep me too.That's good. I'd like to know how many of the higher risk groups took part in the trials.
The logical conclusion is that as the government has ordered only so many that they'll do mass vaccination using one shotOxford vaccine is 90%effective, but for some reason BBC are portraying Only 70%
Like the others it requires two shots but is 70%effective after the first , Also talked of the first being a half dose.
This one doesn't require so much paraphernalia to store it.
Guess so,100M though .The logical conclusion is that as the government has ordered only so many that they'll do mass vaccination using one shot
Looking at it again ,1.5 shots just about correlates to the entire population .The logical conclusion is that as the government has ordered only so many that they'll do mass vaccination using one shot
Oxford vaccine 70% effective. It's it just me who thinks that isn't very good?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?