Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Championship thread 25/26! (48 Viewers)

  • Thread starter shepardo01
  • Start date May 14, 2025
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 378
  • 379
  • 380
First Prev 380 of 380

Lamps

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 11:36 AM
  • #13,266
Liquid Gold said:
Wrexham are well under at the moment but with PSR they could fall foul of the rules.

They have made a loss of £10.7m over the last 3 published accounting periods from 2021-2024. That is well below the £39m loss they're allowed to incur.

The 25/26 accounts will be the interesting ones though. I can't see how revenue will have increased that much for them and they are spending multi millions on single transfers now and making a lot of them.
Click to expand...
They were under different rules then. The £39m loss over 3 years is for FFP in the Championship which is known as profit and sustainability (P&S)

League One and League Two Clubs follow the Salary Cost Management Protocol (“SCMP”) These state that Clubs can only spend a fixed percentage of its revenue on player wages etc. This limit can also be added to or impacted by equity injections or net transfer spend. This is now lower than it was before the start of this season because of what Wrexham and Birmingham did. It is now 60% of income for players expenditure in League One and 50% for League Two. But owners can donate as much as they like and the % of this can go on players expenditure. That's how they got to spend so much. They have a clean slate on entry to the Championship.

That's how Birmingham got to spend lots like £15m on Stansfield.
 

Liquid Gold

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 11:38 AM
  • #13,267
Lamps said:
They were under different rules then. The £39m loss over 3 years is for FFP in the Championship which is known as profit and sustainability (P&S)

League One and League Two Clubs follow the Salary Cost Management Protocol (“SCMP”) These state that Clubs can only spend a fixed percentage of its revenue on player wages etc. This limit can also be added to or impacted by equity injections or net transfer spend. This is now lower than it was before the start of this season because of what Wrexham and Birmingham did. It is now 60% of income for players expenditure in League One and 50% for League Two. But owners can donate as much as they like and the % of this can go on players expenditure. That's how they got to spend so much. They have a clean slate on entry to the Championship.

That's how Birmingham got to spend lots like £15m on Stansfield.
Click to expand...
The 3 year window still becomes relevant when you get promoted into the championship. The idea that there is a grace period is an urban myth.

Clubs have to submit figures to the EFL to say they will come under the losses needed for any 3 year period.

 

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 11:40 AM
  • #13,268
AFCCOVENTRY said:
Look at this set of games for Ipswich

View attachment 49264
Click to expand...
I know it's not quite possible, but I can see them getting minus 4 points from that lot
 
Reactions: Sky Blue Pete

Lamps

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 11:40 AM
  • #13,269
Liquid Gold said:
The 3 year window still becomes relevant when you get promoted into the championship. The idea that there is a grace period is an urban myth.

Clubs have to submit figures to the EFL to say they will come under the losses needed for any 3 year period.

View attachment 49265
Click to expand...

Financial Regulation

The Official home of the English Football League
www.efl.com
 

Sick Boy

Super Moderator
  • Today at 11:41 AM
  • #13,270
Liquid Gold said:
The 3 year window still becomes relevant when you get promoted into the championship. The idea that there is a grace period is an urban myth.

Clubs have to submit figures to the EFL to say they will come under the losses needed for any 3 year period.

View attachment 49265
Click to expand...
Ah yes, the ever-reliable ChatGPT.
 
Reactions: HadjiChippo, PaulPUSB and Lamps

JSL

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 11:44 AM
  • #13,271
tom88 said:
I think we will easily extend the gap on them in this period
Click to expand...
Theres more than just Ipswich to worry about. Hull and Millwall are being rather thrush like
 

Liquid Gold

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 11:45 AM
  • #13,272
Lamps said:

Financial Regulation

The Official home of the English Football League
www.efl.com
Click to expand...
from your link

That doesn't start when they go into the league, it looks at the past 3 accounting periods.
 
Reactions: Brighton Sky Blue

Lamps

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 11:48 AM
  • #13,273
Liquid Gold said:
The 3 year window still becomes relevant when you get promoted into the championship. The idea that there is a grace period is an urban myth.

Clubs have to submit figures to the EFL to say they will come under the losses needed for any 3 year period.

View attachment 49265
Click to expand...
If true why did the FL change the rules to try and stop more Clubs doing it after last season?

What you're saying is under the rules of League One they could spend as much as they like as long as they are given enough money by their owner, but as soon as they get promoted they have suddenly broken the FFP rules?
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 11:50 AM
  • #13,274
Lamps said:
If true why did the FL change the rules to try and stop more Clubs doing it after last season?

What you're saying is under the rules of League One they could spend as much as they like as long as they are given enough money by their owner, but as soon as they get promoted they have suddenly broken the FFP rules?
Click to expand...
Birmingham have been in this league for 2 out of the 3 seasons, 23/24 still counts and rightly so.
 
Reactions: Lamps

Lamps

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 11:50 AM
  • #13,275
Liquid Gold said:
from your link View attachment 49267

That doesn't start when they go into the league, it looks at the past 3 accounting periods.
Click to expand...
Yes the big words are Championship Clubs
 

Lamps

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 11:53 AM
  • #13,276
Brighton Sky Blue said:
Birmingham have been in this league for 2 out of the 3 seasons, 23/24 still counts and rightly so.
Click to expand...
But because of the difference in the rules they get away with last seasons spend.
 

Liquid Gold

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 11:53 AM
  • #13,277
Lamps said:
Yes the big words are Championship Clubs
Click to expand...
You're just wrong mate but I know what you're like and you're gonna start being condescending by using phrases like "big words" to imply I don't understand things so I'm just going to leave you to it.
 
Reactions: fernandopartridge and Ccfcisparks

Lamps

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 11:54 AM
  • #13,278
Liquid Gold said:
You're just wrong mate but I know what you're like and you're gonna start being condescending by using phrases like "big words" to imply I don't understand things so I'm just going to leave you to it.
Click to expand...
The rules are there.

Or how else have Birmingham got away with spending an absolute fortune like £15m on Stansfield alone when in League One?
 

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 11:57 AM
  • #13,279
Lamps said:
I'm only looking at the top 5 because Derby, Wrexham and Preston are 14 points behind us with 14 games to go. We won't be in the top two if any of them catch us up.

I'm not bothered who finishes where as long as we finish in the top two.
Click to expand...
Yeh I don't mean anyone outside top 5 is a automatic contender. I just mean it's not only 6th place that is up for grabs
 
Reactions: Lamps

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 11:59 AM
  • #13,280
Sick Boy said:
Ah yes, the ever-reliable ChatGPT.
Click to expand...
yeah, it's right this time though
 

Earlsdon_Skyblue1

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 12:01 PM
  • #13,281
covcity4life said:
Yeh I don't mean anyone outside top 5 is a automatic contender. I just mean it's not only 6th place that is up for grabs
Click to expand...

People are allowed to make predictions. I think the general point is that the league is so close that even the team down in 16th has a shot at the playoffs if they were to put a few wins together.
 

Lamps

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 12:02 PM
  • #13,282
covcity4life said:
Yeh I don't mean anyone outside top 5 is a automatic contender. I just mean it's not only 6th place that is up for grabs
Click to expand...
Definitely correct there. Any side in the top 16 can make the playoffs and 8th are only 6 points off 4th.
 
Reactions: covcity4life

Lamps

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 12:05 PM
  • #13,283
David O'Day said:
yeah, it's right this time though
Click to expand...
I suppose the Championship rules are the same as the Premiership rules so Leicester were right to question their punishment.

I'll leave it to the experts on here.
 

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 12:32 PM
  • #13,284
Earlsdon_Skyblue1 said:
People are allowed to make predictions. I think the general point is that the league is so close that even the team down in 16th has a shot at the playoffs if they were to put a few wins together.
Click to expand...
No need to be defensive about it. I'm not disagreeing with the notion that mid table clubs still have alot to play for. I'm simply adding I don't think it's only 6th place that is available to them that's all
 

SBAndy

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 12:53 PM
  • #13,285
Lamps said:
I suppose the Championship rules are the same as the Premiership rules so Leicester were right to question their punishment.

I'll leave it to the experts on here.
Click to expand...

Whilst the ‘rules’ framework is the same, because they are two different governing bodies (PL/EFL) that was the issue. Championship and L1 both fall under EFL jurisdiction.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 1:29 PM
  • #13,286
Lamps said:
The rules are there.

Or how else have Birmingham got away with spending an absolute fortune like £15m on Stansfield alone when in League One?
Click to expand...
Your interpretation of the rules would make them inconsistent and unfair
 

Lamps

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 1:39 PM
  • #13,287
fernandopartridge said:
Your interpretation of the rules would make them inconsistent and unfair
Click to expand...
And that's why they are. Just like it isn't really fair between the Championship and the Prem.

The difference between League One and the Championship has never really mattered before until last season where 2 teams bought promotion. Birmingham spent so much that they would be in trouble under Championship rules. The FL have changed the rules from before this season but could only tweak them.

The problem is the two sets of rules are not compatible. An owner could in theory donate £100m to their club and they could spend 60% of it on player expenditure. They would make a massive loss. Then on promotion to the Championship they would fall foul of the Championship rules but would have kept to the rules fully before promotion.

Edit

How much money is a Prem side allowed to lose over 3 years? If they have lost more than £39m over the last 3 years what happens to them if they then get relegated to the Championship?
 
Last edited: Today at 1:46 PM

Earlsdon_Skyblue1

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 1:47 PM
  • #13,288
covcity4life said:
No need to be defensive about it. I'm not disagreeing with the notion that mid table clubs still have alot to play for. I'm simply adding I don't think it's only 6th place that is available to them that's all
Click to expand...

It's not being defensive. It's just getting fucking annoying that you have gone back to every other post being a swipe at someone. You know what you are doing and then make stupid comments like this when called out.

I haven't seen anyone say the top 5 are cemented. It's just pointing out that at the moment the 6th place spot is the one more likely open to those teams still in the bottom half. It's not remotely controversial.
 
Reactions: Ccfcisparks

CCFC96

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 1:49 PM
  • #13,289
fernandopartridge said:
I don't think sell on fees are part of their objective really. If they think they can get promoted they presumably will be pulling in some extra recent from the USA which means that transfer sell ons are less important than they might be for us.
Click to expand...
Yeah true - I guess if I was a fan I’d be worried that they’re so reliant on the Americans financing everything. If they get bored or some of the bigger investors decide to pull the plug it could cause real issues.
 
Reactions: fernandopartridge

Ccfcisparks

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 1:50 PM
  • #13,290
Earlsdon_Skyblue1 said:
It's not being defensive. It's just getting fucking annoying that you have gone back to every other post being a swipe at someone. You know what you are doing and then make stupid comments like this when called out.

I haven't seen anyone say the top 5 are cemented. It's just pointing out that at the moment the 6th place spot is the one more likely open to those teams still in the bottom half. It's not remotely controversial.
Click to expand...
Yes its strange. Since we won hes been going back point scoring.
 
Reactions: Earlsdon_Skyblue1

Lamps

Well-Known Member
  • 58 minutes ago
  • #13,291
CCFC96 said:
Yeah true - I guess if I was a fan I’d be worried that they’re so reliant on the Americans financing everything. If they get bored or some of the bigger investors decide to pull the plug it could cause real issues.
Click to expand...
They are now under Championship rules so can't continue buying anyone they fancy unless their TV rights are massive. If they are, they won't need more massive investments. They have 2 more seasons to get promotion to the Prem before the problems could start.
 

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
  • 54 minutes ago
  • #13,292
Earlsdon_Skyblue1 said:
It's not being defensive. It's just getting fucking annoying that you have gone back to every other post being a swipe at someone. You know what you are doing and then make stupid comments like this when called out.

I haven't seen anyone say the top 5 are cemented. It's just pointing out that at the moment the 6th place spot is the one more likely open to those teams still in the bottom half. It's not remotely controversial.
Click to expand...
 

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
  • 53 minutes ago
  • #13,293
Ccfcisparks said:
Yes its strange. Since we won hes been going back point scoring.
Click to expand...
You mean let posters talk nonsense and then pretend it never happened?

Not for me

Anyway leave me alone im neuro divergent and suffer from mental health issues
 

Ccfcisparks

Well-Known Member
  • 50 minutes ago
  • #13,294
covcity4life said:
You mean let posters talk nonsense and then pretend it never happened?

Not for me

Anyway leave me alone im neuro divergent and suffer from mental health issues
Click to expand...
WOW that is low.

I'm not going to stoop so low to bring up some of your personal issues that have been documented on here.
 
Reactions: covcity4life

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
  • 48 minutes ago
  • #13,295
Ccfcisparks said:
WOW that is low.

I'm not going to stoop so low to bring up some of your personal issues that have been documented on here.
Click to expand...
Like you did multiple times in past? You think I forgot?

Your boring. Let this be the last time we speak. Your blocked for good.

Take care x
 

Ccfcisparks

Well-Known Member
  • 48 minutes ago
  • #13,296
covcity4life said:
Like you did multiple times in past? You think I forgot?

Your boring. Let this be the last time we speak. Your blocked for good.

Take care x
Click to expand...
Not the sort of comments I expect from someone in a pastoral position!

Its You're in your post, not your.
 

SBAndy

Well-Known Member
  • 17 minutes ago
  • #13,297
Lamps said:
How much money is a Prem side allowed to lose over 3 years? If they have lost more than £39m over the last 3 years what happens to them if they then get relegated to the Championship?
Click to expand...

There is a modifier in place allowing higher losses for each season spent in the PL. Off the top of my head, think it’s £45m per season rather than £13m.
 

Nick

Administrator
  • 5 minutes ago
  • #13,298
Just seen Wrexham's 2nd goal.

Clear offside, Lino bottled it.
 
Reactions: Sky Blue Harry H
W

wingy

Well-Known Member
  • 3 minutes ago
  • #13,299
TomRad85 said:
Just like when they sponsored their own stadium and funnelled money in that way. That bulb-headed c**t just says the word revenue and all the dopey cunts that follow him like rats following the piper parrot it as if fucking Blues are a money making machine and its all above board. Never have I wanted a club to fall on its arse so much.
Click to expand...
It's just business.🫣
 
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 378
  • 379
  • 380
First Prev 380 of 380
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

  • TotnumorchelseaA moment ago
  • KenilworthSkyBlue1 minute ago
  • xcraigx2 minutes ago
  • Skybluecov12 minutes ago
  • Hutch112 minutes ago
  • wingy3 minutes ago
  • Sky Blue Harry H3 minutes ago
  • TomRad855 minutes ago
  • shepardo015 minutes ago
  • edgy5 minutes ago
  • Armchair Honved Fan5 minutes ago
  • shmmeee6 minutes ago
  • Merseyskyblue9 minutes ago
  • SonofErnie9 minutes ago
  • Graham6410 minutes ago
  • LevelBest10 minutes ago
  • Tealeaf14 minutes ago
  • JPG7714 minutes ago
  • DH - Sky Blue15 minutes ago
  • ... and 12 more.
  • Total: 46 (members: 31, guests: 15)
    Share:
    Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
    • Home
    • Forums
    • Coventry City Football Club
    • Coventry City General Chat
    • Default Style
    • Contact us
    • Terms and rules
    • Privacy policy
    • Help
    • Home
    Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
    Menu
    Log in

    Register

    • Home
    • Forums
      • New posts
      • Search forums
    • What's new
      • New posts
      • Latest activity
    • Members
      • Current visitors
    • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
    X

    Privacy & Transparency

    We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

    • Personalized ads and content
    • Content measurement and audience insights

    Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

    X

    Privacy & Transparency

    We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

    • Personalized ads and content
    • Content measurement and audience insights

    Do you accept cookies and these technologies?