Perhaps Thick Van damme should look up the definition of bile . It's not an accusation , it's an observation. It's an opinion . He can't let it go now. He's like a child jumping up and down . I don't make demands of him so if he thinks he can do the same of me he will be disappointed.Of course it is, it's a carry on from all of the other bullshit threads that people avoid.
There was actually a decent response to the thread to start with, then the usual nonsense occurs.
Perhaps Thick Van damme should look up the definition of bile . It's not an accusation , it's an observation. It's an opinion . He can't let it go now. He's like a child jumping up and down . I don't make demands of him so if he thinks he can do the same of me he will be disappointed.
To say anyone is a fucking this or that is bile/ hatred but it's all over this site.
It’s not even politics bickering, it’s just purposely derailing threads now.Give it a fucking rest with your politics bickering, keep it in off topic or PM each other.
Other than about 5 or 6 people nobody else gives a shit about it all. I will even make you your own hidden forum you can go on and on and on and on in that doesn't bother anybody else if it makes you happy.
Jesus Christ . Just leave it alone.
Perhaps Thick Van damme should look up the definition of bile . It's not an accusation , it's an observation. It's an opinion . He can't let it go now. He's like a child jumping up and down . I don't make demands of him so if he thinks he can do the same of me he will be disappointed.
To say anyone is a fucking this or that is bile/ hatred but it's all over this site.
Perhaps there's a few people who need to grow the fuck up.
I didn't go to university, just don't understand why you and him are bothered?Well theres a surprise pricdick the lefty virtual signaller doesnt like your post.
a well thought out and unbiased post mate but unfortunately you will be cancelled and abused by the left wing mob on here who no doubt have just come back from their university lectures to tell you what a nasty biggot you are and free speech is great as long as it fits in with their own views and agenda.
just waiting for their vial replies now to attack you and anyone else who dares to speak their mind
He probably doesn’t know why he’s bothered either, he’s thick as fuckI didn't go to university, just don't understand why you and him are bothered?
Contributing to it doesn't help tbf markIs there a setting on Tapatalk where I can avoid off topic chat? Seems it's latest post on every thread bumps it to the top of my thread list.
Sent from my SM-G780F using Tapatalk
Yep, hence why I'd rather it didn't jump to the top of my thread list. Read absolute nonsense and tend to feel the need to contribute some of my own.Contributing to it doesn't help tbf mark
Can you unwatch the tread in tapatalk?Yep, hence why I'd rather it didn't jump to the top of my thread list. Read absolute nonsense and tend to feel the need to contribute some of my own.
Sent from my SM-G780F using Tapatalk
If you can, I haven't found it.Can you unwatch the tread in tapatalk?
(As it happens, I'd love a thread ignore feature!)
(As it happens, I'd love a thread ignore feature!)
Only way it happens atm is if you ignore the thread starter. Hence the occasional amusing 'where's the match thread?' posts.There might be a way to do that
I too want to see burning crosses.I'm a member of the Ku Klux Klan, I want to see burning crosses and people running round with pillow cases on there heads at every match other wise my rights to being a bigoted twat are being ignored, and I'll cry to the f.a. BBC and my local m.p. then you'll all be sorry .
Absolutely outrageous and unbelievable.I'm a member of the Ku Klux Klan, I want to see burning crosses and people running round with pillow cases on there heads at every match other wise my rights to being a bigoted twat are being ignored, and I'll cry to the f.a. BBC and my local m.p. then you'll all be sorry .
I too want to see burning crosses.
That's why Kane should start over Dabo.
It needs the spotlight because even now, players are terrified of the public finding out about their sexual preferences.I see the thread has been totally derailed! Would have responded to some of the posts much earlier but sadly work got in the way.
I was after a debate about something that is concerning for me but wanted to know what others for and against viewpoints were. On reflection my use of the word 'choices' may have been too insensitive for those who support LGTB+ and it only served to dilute my initial question. I also asked if it's not a choice then what is it? And based on some of the more thought out responses I can only conclude most believe they are born like it and an intrinsic part of their personality. I'm not so sure it's as simple as that but I cannot offer an alternative explanation but do struggle to accept any person to be first and foremost defined by their sexuality preference.
Duffer made a point saying the campaign was really about the LGBT community being accepted for who they are even in football. I agree they should but I'm unclear about why it is so necessary for the fanfare and the need for a spotlight on who they are sexually to be accepted? Why do I or anybody else need to know someone's sexuality preferences for them to take part in life's activities? Quite frankly I'd rather not know because it may get in the way of getting to know the person.
Can I just thank Mr Monkey, Riyadh and Stay up sky blues for taking the time to provide first hand experiences and to everyone one who provided a measured response. I do have my opinion and my OP was not intended to cause offence but rather to understand why the club should support the campaign. Coventry City FC or any other club are unlikely to turn away a fan or turn down a good player based on their sexuality so I'm still not sure that question has been answered successfully.
Anyway I appreciate that what I have asked has polarised opinions but I think it is good to have these kinds of debates without vitriol. If nothing else we can all be better informed regardless of agreement.
I see the thread has been totally derailed! Would have responded to some of the posts much earlier but sadly work got in the way.
I was after a debate about something that is concerning for me but wanted to know what others for and against viewpoints were. On reflection my use of the word 'choices' may have been too insensitive for those who support LGTB+ and it only served to dilute my initial question. I also asked if it's not a choice then what is it? And based on some of the more thought out responses I can only conclude most believe they are born like it and an intrinsic part of their personality. I'm not so sure it's as simple as that but I cannot offer an alternative explanation but do struggle to accept any person to be first and foremost defined by their sexuality preference.
Duffer made a point saying the campaign was really about the LGBT community being accepted for who they are even in football. I agree they should but I'm unclear about why it is so necessary for the fanfare and the need for a spotlight on who they are sexually to be accepted? Why do I or anybody else need to know someone's sexuality preferences for them to take part in life's activities? Quite frankly I'd rather not know because it may get in the way of getting to know the person.
Can I just thank Mr Monkey, Riyadh and Stay up sky blues for taking the time to provide first hand experiences and to everyone one who provided a measured response. I do have my opinion and my OP was not intended to cause offence but rather to understand why the club should support the campaign. Coventry City FC or any other club are unlikely to turn away a fan or turn down a good player based on their sexuality so I'm still not sure that question has been answered successfully.
Anyway I appreciate that what I have asked has polarised opinions but I think it is good to have these kinds of debates without vitriol. If nothing else we can all be better informed regardless of agreement.
Ouch, he’s going to need to some aloe vera for that burnYou taught me everything there is to know about being a snowflake.
It's kind of how campaigns work. If no one mentioned anything and made no effort no one would know about it would they?I'm unclear about why it is so necessary for the fanfare and the need for a spotlight on who they are sexually to be accepted?
The only caveat I have to that is I don't particularly like seeing heterosexual couples overtly being affectionate and all over each other in public either. Could well be me that's the problem here, I just prefer everyone to keep it behind closed doors whatever their sexual preference.I don't remember ever seeing a gay couple holding hands or having a kiss at a football ground and I've seen it many many times with straight couples.
There are always stories about footballers and their wags in the press but none of them have boyfriend or husband.
Both of those just being the case are statistically impossible.
Until people are comfortable to love the people they love without living in any fear then we need more rainbow laces.
I mean, I tend to agree with you when people go overboard.The only caveat I have to that is I don't particularly like seeing heterosexual couples overtly being affectionate and all over each other in public either. Could well be me that's the problem here, I just prefer everyone to keep it behind closed doors whatever their sexual preference.
I sort of agree.The only caveat I have to that is I don't particularly like seeing heterosexual couples overtly being affectionate and all over each other in public either. Could well be me that's the problem here, I just prefer everyone to keep it behind closed doors whatever their sexual preference.
I see the thread has been totally derailed! Would have responded to some of the posts much earlier but sadly work got in the way.
I was after a debate about something that is concerning for me but wanted to know what others for and against viewpoints were. On reflection my use of the word 'choices' may have been too insensitive for those who support LGTB+ and it only served to dilute my initial question. I also asked if it's not a choice then what is it? And based on some of the more thought out responses I can only conclude most believe they are born like it and an intrinsic part of their personality. I'm not so sure it's as simple as that but I cannot offer an alternative explanation but do struggle to accept any person to be first and foremost defined by their sexuality preference.
Duffer made a point saying the campaign was really about the LGBT community being accepted for who they are even in football. I agree they should but I'm unclear about why it is so necessary for the fanfare and the need for a spotlight on who they are sexually to be accepted? Why do I or anybody else need to know someone's sexuality preferences for them to take part in life's activities? Quite frankly I'd rather not know because it may get in the way of getting to know the person.
Can I just thank Mr Monkey, Riyadh and Stay up sky blues for taking the time to provide first hand experiences and to everyone one who provided a measured response. I do have my opinion and my OP was not intended to cause offence but rather to understand why the club should support the campaign. Coventry City FC or any other club are unlikely to turn away a fan or turn down a good player based on their sexuality so I'm still not sure that question has been answered successfully.
Anyway I appreciate that what I have asked has polarised opinions but I think it is good to have these kinds of debates without vitriol. If nothing else we can all be better informed regardless of agreement.
I see the thread has been totally derailed! Would have responded to some of the posts much earlier but sadly work got in the way.
I was after a debate about something that is concerning for me but wanted to know what others for and against viewpoints were. On reflection my use of the word 'choices' may have been too insensitive for those who support LGTB+ and it only served to dilute my initial question. I also asked if it's not a choice then what is it? And based on some of the more thought out responses I can only conclude most believe they are born like it and an intrinsic part of their personality. I'm not so sure it's as simple as that but I cannot offer an alternative explanation but do struggle to accept any person to be first and foremost defined by their sexuality preference.
Duffer made a point saying the campaign was really about the LGBT community being accepted for who they are even in football. I agree they should but I'm unclear about why it is so necessary for the fanfare and the need for a spotlight on who they are sexually to be accepted? Why do I or anybody else need to know someone's sexuality preferences for them to take part in life's activities? Quite frankly I'd rather not know because it may get in the way of getting to know the person.
Can I just thank Mr Monkey, Riyadh and Stay up sky blues for taking the time to provide first hand experiences and to everyone one who provided a measured response. I do have my opinion and my OP was not intended to cause offence but rather to understand why the club should support the campaign. Coventry City FC or any other club are unlikely to turn away a fan or turn down a good player based on their sexuality so I'm still not sure that question has been answered successfully.
Anyway I appreciate that what I have asked has polarised opinions but I think it is good to have these kinds of debates without vitriol. If nothing else we can all be better informed regardless of agreement.
Let me start this with the fact my daughter is gay and it makes not a slightest bit of difference to me who she is , how she is and how much I love her.
She tells me that friends of hers have openly chosen to be gay.
They experiment with each other , male and females then decide which they prefer.
They can also be in a long term relationship with someone from the same sex then an equally long term relationship with someone from the opposite.
Not sure if they're classed as gay, bi or hetro but choice is definitely involved
And none of the above is weird, wrong or unnatural
Exactly. You are either a boy attracted to girls or a girl attracted to boys, or boy to boy, or girl to girl, or it can both and you are bisexual.Can I ask why you think being gay happens in a different way to being straight?
I didn't make a conscious decision to be straight, it just happened as I'm sure it did with you. Why would being gay come about through some other process?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?