Well, the honeymoon is well and truly over! We are officially shit again! Will we do well in League 2?
No - points per game we are better off. No you couldn't make it up that people still can't comprehend elementary mathematics.
Blaming SISU whilst no feasible alternative exists is pretty futile though, isn't it? I'm nearly past caring when it comes to CCFC as it is. Our best chances of a return to the Championship would have been at the first attempt as our funding beyond this season looks especially bleak-and yet with one of the highest wage expenditures in the division we're in the bottom 4.
Read my other post, I believe that sisu had an opportunity, that they chose to ruin.
The sisu alternative debate is done to death, you won't draw me on that one. They are here to stay, but my school report for them says 'could do better, they need to think before rushing in with.scisors and glue'
No - points per game we are better off. No you couldn't make it up that people still can't comprehend elementary mathematics.
Love the optimism.I was at the game. After we scored we were under pressure for rest of the half, could hardy put two passes together, and Brentford deserved to score.
2nd half was more even, but they still had more chances and should have scored before the pen. But, Goldie forced a save from outside the box and we also hit the post.
Also, the ref/linesman missed what should have been a clear Cov thow-in literally 1 minute before the pen. If anyone else saw better I'll stand corrected. But the point here is fine margins. We were a just few inches away from winning it..! then they get a lucky break with the non-throw, go down and score.
At the least we could have easily got a point away to a decent side in this league. It's just bad luck.. not quite ready to slit my wrists yet!
And yeah I know we should be thinking to win these games - but Robins surely thinks the same - I guess that's why he brought on Cody instead of a defensive sub. And it nearly worked too. So roll on Orient I say..
This season they've provided Fisher with one of the biggest budgets in the division-and it is being royally wasted. Just as when Ranson was entrusted to squander bigger sums in the Championship a few years ago.
Agreed, but to ignore the mistakes they have made, and to keep blaming JUST thorn, is a bit like ignoring the reason for lady Godiva getting her kit off!
Time for bed, have a good evening..
The mistake was trusting Thorn to identify players who have turned out to be disappointments-so yes, the blame lies with all three.
Thorn 3 games 3 points = 1 point per game
Since sacking
11 games 8 points = 0.72 point per game
1>0.72
Shall we go through the math again or do you understand?
Robins has done marginally better than Thorn but as a whole since he was sacked we have done worse which is what dadgad said, we have done worse since Thorn was sacked
Waggot and Fisher should have ditched Thorn months ago. It was their responsibility. Leaving it to when they did was ludicrous.
Made no sense either as it has made Robbins's job twice as hard.
Soon the moronic fans will turn on him and so it goes on......
In my book the buck stops with senior management and since SISU have been here the only one who seemed to have a handle on how football works was Ranson.
Waggot and Fisher should have ditched Thorn months ago. It was their responsibility. Leaving it to when they did was ludicrous.
Made no sense either as it has made Robbins's job twice as hard.
Soon the moronic fans will turn on him and so it goes on......
In my book the buck stops with senior management and since SISU have been here the only one who seemed to have a handle on how football works was Ranson.
Frankly anyone who acts as an apologist for Thorn deserves the club we have now got - he created the culture and anyone who tries to justify it is beyond reason.
We are where we are because of Thorn - or are you telling me that our position is now better since he waddled into position?
Would you take him back?
Absolutely.
How can anyone do any better with no resources and hands tied behind their backs.
The sad thing is that it is almost impossible, now, for the manager to be given any help. At best, he will have to wheel and deal - but there is limited scope due to transfer windows.
Ranson made mistakes but I cannot believe that anyone thinks we're better off since he walked.
We seemed to have a strategy which involved taking a punt on potential. The decline since Ranson has been huge imho......he was the only one at Sisu who had any footballing pedigree.
I doubt he would have appointed Thorn, for instance.
Ranson made mistakes but I cannot believe that anyone thinks we're better off since he walked.
We seemed to have a strategy which involved taking a punt on potential. The decline since Ranson has been huge imho......he was the only one at Sisu who had any footballing pedigree.
I doubt he would have appointed Thorn, for instance.
Er....he intially did didn't he?
He appointed Coleman and was very willing to give him more time than most chairmen tend to these days-a major error in judgement which set things in place for further decline.
Ranson appointed Thorn as caretaker when Boothroyd was sacked I believe, Deluded appointed him full timeYou're joking.:facepalm:
Coleman (when he took the Wales job) suggested he was let down by SISU. It was when Sisu wanted to sell Thomas to Liverpool that both Boothroyd and Ranson left.
Shortly before Christmas we were in the playoffs.......ergo.....since Ranson we have dropped off the cliff.
Did you see it being *this* bad though Otis?
Er....he intially did didn't he?
He recommended Thorn to SISU, saying afterwards they would have no idea about selecting managers
His parting gift.
He knew they'd go for the cheap option.
Clueless twats
Think you will find the fans wanted him.
Some thought he was the Second Coming.
That aside, 2-1 win tonight (although as im a jinx ill also say 2-1 defeat, then they might do the opposite to what i predict)
we could be in another prem in two years :claping hands:
How many SBA there sw?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?