Sky Blue Kid
Well-Known Member
Lmfao.... You were still WRONG!
When you show up to join in its usually a good sign somebody else is right, you are consistently wrong.
You can watch full match replays now btw.
No I wasn't? It was a example of what a "chance".Lmfao.... You were still WRONG!
My favourite part was Gould struggling with Kelly-Evans' name and suggesting he be referred to as DKE to avoid confusion with anyone else, get him in every week.
I much prefer that over someone trying to stay objective, it's very infectious. He was exasperated by some of what he saw in the first half and then encouraged in the second, exactly how a fan would respond. That's what I want to hear as a listenerThe one thing I will say about Bobby Gould.. He cares.
It was an example of what a "chance" is.
Just because it was a shot, it doesn't mean it was a chance created.
The opposition could make us resort to lame shots from outside the box which don't trouble them in the slightest.
Yes he did, he was angry with our performance and asked that very question.According to the OP he was saying the scouting at the club was not good enough - did he say that?
Stop hijacking threads with your argumentative bull shit, are you ever wrong? You’re meant to be impartial ffs. Stop ruining this forum.It was an example of what a "chance" is.
Just because it was a shot, it doesn't mean it was a chance created.
The opposition could make us resort to lame shots from outside the box which don't trouble them in the slightest.
Stop hijacking threads with your argumentative bull shit, are you ever wrong? You’re meant to be impartial ffs. Stop ruining this forum.
Says the wum account, in fact discussing chances / shots is very relevant When talking about strikers.Stop hijacking threads with your argumentative bull shit, are you ever wrong? You’re meant to be impartial ffs. Stop ruining this forum.
He is often wrong. Dont let it bother you.
It was your choice of a chance.Because it was an example of a "chance", quite obviously.
It was your choice of a chance.
To me I see it differently.
You have a very good chance, a good chance, a decent chance, a bit of a chance and a shit chance.
When someone scores a worldie did he have no chance of scoring?
When someone scores a good goal they had a decent chance.
They are all chances.
Isn't the word chance a strange word.
Chicken shit twat?You fuckin boring twat, get my account running properly you chicken shit twat
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You fuckin boring twat, get my account running properly you chicken shit twat
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I much prefer that over someone trying to stay objective, it's very infectious. He was exasperated by some of what he saw in the first half and then encouraged in the second, exactly how a fan would respond. That's what I want to hear as a listener
There's nothing wrong with your account.But he’s meant to be impartial, he dives onto every thread and wrecks it. He’s slowed my account down because I’ve dared to question him and his bull shit.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
But he’s meant to be impartial, he dives onto every thread and wrecks it. He’s slowed my account down because I’ve dared to question him and his bull shit.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
There's nothing wrong with your account.
I said we hadn't created proper chances in a discussion about strikers. That's how discussions work.
Don't cry petal.
Why is he meant to be impartial you clown?
This isn't the BBC
Why don't you input then about our strikers and the decent chances then or the system we play and how it impacts our strikers then?Arguing the toss about what a chance is, fuckin idiot
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You do realise I didn't actually hijack anything don't you, I said even though we had shots we didn't create proper chances in the previous game. Very related to the topic.I knew you’d approve his thread hijacking, you’re worse than he is. Pair of twats
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You do realise I didn't actually hijack anything don't you, I said even though we had shots we didn't create proper chances in the previous game. Very related to the topic.
Yesterday we had wingers on who would have created chances if we had someone who could score. They scored the second goal between them. We had good chances that were missed because we don't have someone used to scoring goals. We don't have someone in the middle who can run at players, go past them then score.There's nothing wrong with your account.
I said we hadn't created proper chances in a discussion about strikers. That's how discussions work.
Don't cry petal.
Yesterday we had wingers on who would have created chances if we had someone who could score. They scored the second goal between them. We had good chances that were missed because we don't have someone used to scoring goals. We don't have someone in the middle who can run at players, go past them then score.
Many of us pointed this out before the season started. It doesn't matter how many strikers we have. We just don't have 'the one'
There is a "Gerrard" chance (a shot which might go in or might go over the stand) & then there is a realistic chance...where most people think it was worthwhile having a go as there were no other options.What is a shot, if not a chance?
We have people on here that would argue that black is white.wonder if there's any other club with a message board where the day after beating the league leaders war breaks out over what constitutes a chance?!
We have people on here that would argue that black is white.
We have a good defence. We have a good midfield. We have strikers that are best setting others up. Look at how many times Beavon has fluffed it in front of goal. But he is good at setting up the striker we don't have.
Then we have some that say certain players are greedy in front of goal. But who do they have to pass to that can score?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?