Welcome to Sky Blues Talk!

You're currently viewing the forum as a guest. Join thousands of fellow Coventry City fans today!

Register Log in

'Anti-SISU brigade'

Nick said:
Not that I am aware of. That's what I mean, he wasn't really on here trying to be undercover and fool people.
Click to expand...

No to be fair, that is his dads, used to post quite a lot on GMK back in the day.
 
lordsummerisle said:
No to be fair, that is his dads, used to post quite a lot on GMK back in the day.
Click to expand...

Yep I know, but it was him logging in and using it a few times. Which was my point when he went on about being strict with the rules etc so I said that is against the rules. I did say then it isn't an "ongoing" thing where somebody is living a double life etc.
 
Nick said:
Yep I know, but it was him logging in and using it a few times. Which was my point when he went on about being strict with the rules etc so I said that is against the rules. I did say then it isn't an "ongoing" thing where somebody is living a double life etc.
Click to expand...

Did he try to sue you though?

He does like a strop and could see that happening!
 
lordsummerisle said:
Did he try to sue you though?

He does like a strop and could see that happening!
Click to expand...

No, I didn't get any legal letters or anything but there was talk of it so more a threat. I just took it as something said when somebody was angry to be fair.

Ironically not the only thing like that I have had off members when people disagree with them. Usually the ones who love to go on about SISU taking legal action against fans.
 
Nick said:
No, I didn't get any legal letters or anything but there was talk of it so more a threat. I just took it as something said when somebody was angry to be fair.

Ironically not the only thing like that I have had off members when people disagree with them. Usually the ones who love to go on about SISU taking legal action against fans.
Click to expand...

As I said, he does like a strop if he's had a bit too much Sunny D!
 
Nick said:
Wouldn't it be a better quality to not be wrong in the first place rather than being wrong every time and keep changing?

(This is not me saying I am right about everything in the world, just a question)
Click to expand...

The man that made no mistakes made nothing. It's impossible to be right about everything in the first place and to assume that someone/anyone ever could is plain and simple stupid. Probably more stupid than not being big enough to admit you're wrong and change your mind when it becomes obvious that you should.
 
skybluetony176 said:
The man that made no mistakes made nothing. It's impossible to be right about everything in the first place and to assume that someone/anyone ever could is plain and simple stupid. Probably more stupid than not being big enough to admit you're wrong and change your mind when it becomes obvious that you should.
Click to expand...
I'd much prefer to listen to somebody who is right most of the time than somebody who is wrong a lot and keeps changing their mind. Wouldn't you
 
Nick said:
I'd much prefer to listen to somebody who is right most of the time than somebody who is wrong a lot and keeps changing their mind. Wouldn't you
Click to expand...

d03482bca4a876b54c1592c196c5e925.jpg
 
Intentionally splitting the fan base as a strategy is a new one. I've updated my list. While it doesn't surprise me (nothing has for a long time now) what was the plan? Was this when they were trying to create a loyal following in Northampton?

I've just remembered the time they were caught selling training shirts featuring the faint branding of Leicester City's crest! How very apt.
 
Last edited:
Nick said:
I'd much prefer to listen to somebody who is right most of the time than somebody who is wrong a lot and keeps changing their mind. Wouldn't you
Click to expand...

Does this mean that you are going to ignore Les Reid from now?
 
Some of us take boycotting seriously.
 
Nick said:
Was it a strategy though? Have you seen the minutes and stuff from meetings?

Could it be said about other parties recruiting the trust?

What about the council using local media?

Neither are right, just adding to your list as it seems to get forgotten.
Click to expand...

In another thread you asked for a link to a post by anyone other than RFC defending SISU. Well here you are.

If this had been posted on any other thread I'd have argued that it was defending by stealth (i.e. the quick,let's change the subject quick method that you and some others do on a regular basis when people start pointing the finger at SISU) but given the topic of this thread I'm going to promote your post to out and out defending.
 
Interesting the OP here refers to Pressleys settlement stand off a full two weeks prior to the media exposure
 
skybluetony176 said:
In another thread you asked for a link to a post by anyone other than RFC defending SISU. Well here you are.

If this had been posted on any other thread I'd have argued that it was defending by stealth (i.e. the quick,let's change the subject quick method that you and some others do on a regular basis when people start pointing the finger at SISU) but given the topic of this thread I'm going to promote your post to out and out defending.
Click to expand...
No, that is saying something about the council and telegraph. This defending by stealth stuff is bollocks. Find something actually defending them, rather than somebody saying they like blue which is taken as they hate green.
 
Nick said:
No, that is saying something about the council and telegraph. This defending by stealth stuff is bollocks. Find something actually defending them, rather than somebody saying they like blue which is taken as they hate green.
Click to expand...

Denial isn't a river in Africa.
 
'Anti SISU Brigade' it does have an air of The Spanish Civil War about it, bring back the Anarchists!
 
skybluetony176 said:
Denial isn't a river in Africa.
Click to expand...
Post a link to somebody actually defending them. Ie saying they have done nothing wrong, saying they are proud of them etc. Not somebody saying the council are bad.

Apparently it happens all the time so won't be too hard. Obviously bar rfc.
 
I don't "hate" sisu, admittedly I would rather they sold up and moved on and I'd take a chance on someone else. It's those running our football team on SISU's behalf I hate, yes Waggott and Fisher. It is these two who have dictated the policies and the path they seem fit to obtain those policies. It was 100% Fisher's idea to move to Sixfields and the recruitment policy is 100% Waggotts, the appointment and lengthy contract of Pressley was Waggotts, the retention of the hapless Andy Thorn was Waggotts too the cheapest option at the time, the loss of Mark Robins, down to Waggott renageing on promises, forget the official reasons given. Remember in interview Joy Seppalla admitted not even knowing CCFC were part of her organisation, that interview was after the Northampton move. I would love to know the deals both Waggott and Fisher have with sisu for their employment with them, they won't be employees but contracted in to do a job, how are they paid and what does payment depend on.
 
Nick said:
Post a link to somebody actually defending them. Ie saying they have done nothing wrong, saying they are proud of them etc. Not somebody saying the council are bad.

Apparently it happens all the time so won't be too hard. Obviously bar rfc.
Click to expand...

So does this mean that BS comments about defending CCC cease for the same reason or does it come under a different category so has different rules?
 
Astute said:
So does this mean that BS comments about defending CCC cease for the same reason or does it come under a different category so has different rules?
Click to expand...

Somebody attacking SISU isn't defending CCC. Somebody saying "Tim Fisher is a wanker" isn't defending CCC.

Somebody defending CCC is saying how proud they are of them, how they have done nothing wrong etc etc.
 
Nick said:
Somebody attacking SISU isn't defending CCC. Somebody saying "Tim Fisher is a wanker" isn't defending CCC.

Somebody defending CCC is saying how proud they are of them, how they have done nothing wrong etc etc.
Click to expand...

The judges at the JR and Higgs case said that the council have done nothing wrong ( in respect of those cases ). Does that make them members of the "anti SISU Brigade"?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SeaSeeEffCee
    • Like
    • Haha
Message from King
2 3 4
Replies
131
Views
4K
quinn1971
Q
usskyblue
Message from DK
Replies
0
Views
152
usskyblue
usskyblue
AFCCOVENTRY
    • Like
    • Love
It’s finally arrived…
Replies
9
Views
748
Gynnsthetonic
Gynnsthetonic
Nantwich Skyblues
    • Like
Show Doug the money
2
Replies
66
Views
2K
Cov. Kids. Never. Quit
Cov. Kids. Never. Quit
W
    • Love
    • Like
The Phoenix Marko Marosi on his biggest regret, the horror injury and why he still loves Coventry City
Replies
12
Views
879
Cov. Kids. Never. Quit
Cov. Kids. Never. Quit

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top Bottom