Wrong. A lot of non fans give a toss as well, especially with yet more cuts and job losses, they wonder why Coventry liked to financially assist a London Rugby team.
All these cuts and job losses brought in by the Tories and it is the fault of Labour for having to do something as they can't afford the time or money to keep a football stadium for our football club that they got built for us because of the litigation that our clubs owners have been starting and continuing with although they have come nowhere near winning any of it.
Yes we all see it as being wrong. But maybe we need to look at the bigger picture and not just what would have been best for our club or SISU.
Just because she is a city fan does not mean handing over the Ricoh to Sisu for nothing.
Some people are so far up their own arse they can't see whats actually happened here.
We are not far off from the first "Sisu have been hard done by" rant !!
Just because she is a city fan does not mean handing over the Ricoh to Sisu for nothing.
Some people are so far up their own arse they can't see whats actually happened here.
We are not far off from the first "Sisu have been hard done by" rant !!
Just because she is a city fan does not mean handing over the Ricoh to Sisu for nothing.
Some people are so far up their own arse they can't see whats actually happened here.
We are not far off from the first "Sisu have been hard done by" rant !!
SISU tried to yield their axe and back the council into a corner by playing hard ball and the bluff game.
SISU were outwitted so made an 11th hour offer which according to some was more than Wasps offered, however due to the bickering between both parties, the council voted no.
We all know the story blah de blah, but all I have to say on the matter is neither party is innocent in all of this.
SISU tried to yield their axe and back the council into a corner by playing hard ball and the bluff game.
SISU were outwitted so made an 11th hour offer which according to some was more than Wasps offered, however due to the bickering between both parties, the council voted no.
We all know the story blah de blah, but all I have to say on the matter is neither party is innocent in all of this.
They didn't. They made a conditional offer. Like when they made a 'conditional offer' for ACL; on the proviso they could get the distressed Yorkshire Bank loan for a value YB wouldn't sell it for. As such, the conditional offer was worthless.
A bit like when they 'bid' for the Higgs share - again, conditionally, but having moved 'the option' elsewhere within the SISU Group of companies, which wasn't lawful as it was a 'non assignable' option. These are clear facts, laid out in court papers, or there in the public domain
They didn't. They made a conditional offer. Like when they made a 'conditional offer' for ACL; on the proviso they could get the distressed Yorkshire Bank loan for a value YB wouldn't sell it for. As such, the conditional offer was worthless.
A bit like when they 'bid' for the Higgs share - again, conditionally, but having moved 'the option' elsewhere within the SISU Group of companies, which wasn't lawful as it was a 'non assignable' option. These are clear facts, laid out in court papers, or there in the public domain
They didn't. They made a conditional offer. Like when they made a 'conditional offer' for ACL; on the proviso they could get the distressed Yorkshire Bank loan for a value YB wouldn't sell it for. As such, the conditional offer was worthless.
A bit like when they 'bid' for the Higgs share - again, conditionally, but having moved 'the option' elsewhere within the SISU Group of companies, which wasn't lawful as it was a 'non assignable' option. These are clear facts, laid out in court papers, or there in the public domain