Back of a fag packet ?
Back of a fag packet ?We just don't know what changed hands for the stadium could be a paper transaction for all we know?
Amazing how so many clubs sign players on deadline say if they are so organized....Nahh, ain't buying that. There's one day left of a 3 month window, most well organised clubs have their shit together by now. It ain't a fucking car boot sale.
In my opinion it was the biggest signing of the season.he got credit for that but it’s just one facet of owning a club
We are currently neutral on transfer spending this window.In my opinion it was the biggest signing of the season.
From your accountancy background what would you regard as a feasible sum to invest now and I'll compare that with my business owning background for a bit of debate.
My guess is you could be right. That's unless King had a massive piggy bank with a lot of coins in it.We just don't know what changed hands for the stadium could be a paper transaction for all we know?
He could have continued to pay rent.he got credit for that but it’s just one facet of owning a club
Based on the fact that King was previously prepared to go to around £10M for Hughes that's not unreasonable. So why the original sarcastic comment re King ? Smarten your act up , you've surely got to do better than that .We are currently neutral on transfer spending this window.
With another £6.5m coming in a spend of £10m-£15m would suffice.
Because we can only name a 25 man squad, so players have to go out before any new ones can come in.Out of interest, why do people think we'll make 3 signings,tomorrow, in one day, considering we've made 3 in 3 months?
Doesn't make any sense. We'll be lucky to get one in. If we were going to have our top targets signed, it would have happened by now. Ridiculous to think we're saving it all for the 'last day of the window' just to make it exciting.
well a centre half, centre mid and a forward would be niceHe could have continued to pay rent.
King has been brilliant for our club. He could have pocketed money from player sales but has covered losses whilst reinvesting every penny and more on money received and still made big offers for players. On top of this we have our own home for the 1st time since the last century.
What more do you want from him?
You defend King like he’s brucking your back up every night.Based on the fact that King was previously prepared to go to around £10M for Hughes that's not unreasonable. So why the original sarcastic comment re King ? Smarten your act up , you've surely got to do better than that .
This window? Shall we forget that Grimes was bought after we were about even on transfers since his takeover?We are currently neutral on transfer spending this window.
With another £6.5m coming in a spend of £10m-£15m would suffice.
That's an arbitrary cut off point for the last century.He could have continued to pay rent.
King has been brilliant for our club. He could have pocketed money from player sales but has covered losses whilst reinvesting every penny and more on money received and still made big offers for players. On top of this we have our own home for the 1st time since the last century.
What more do you want from him?
Again poor. I see things as they occur , no more no less. Unfortunately you have made your bed and have continued to lie in it despite the fact that a huge purchase has been made. I will leave it up to you to decide who the objective one is.You defend King like he’s brucking your back up every night.
I hope to one day have a squire as loyal as you
Hic!i don’t drink acrually
That guy's done time,at least a couple of year's, personal rather than a business!To be fair, we could stick this version made out of toothpicks in goal, and it would probably do better than any of the keepers we currently have:
View attachment 45670
huh grimes was from january, how about you go back to last summer in that case.This window? Shall we forget that Grimes was bought after we were about even on transfers since his takeover?
You found your niche on unbelievable transfer rumours. The real nitty gritty stuff seems to be a different matter.
So you would prefer if he hadn't bought it and invested in the squad instead ?can the stadium play in the starting 11?
no i’d like both actually!So you would prefer if he hadn't bought it and invested in the squad instead ?
That guy's done time,at least a couple of year's, personal rather than a business!
And from your accountancy background how would you finance this ?no i’d like both actually!
with money obviouslyAnd from your accountancy background how would you finance this ?
now this is some good fucking transfer gossip
Whose money would that be and where would that come from ?with money obviously
You do know we bid £10m on Hughes after buying the stadium Christopher, please keep up.Whose money would that be and where would that come from ?
Saying??now this is some good fucking transfer gossip
had a bid rejected for this danish centre halfSaying??
We put a offer in and they rejected it, seems like they've said no because of injuries to players
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?