That would be scary but all the CBs have been reliable in the sense that they’re v rarely injured. I’m less concerned that we’d run out of CBs as opposed to wingers which is by its nature, a position that has a higher attrition rate.I don’t think either of those are as scary as the prospect of Thomas or Kitching getting injured and playing Bidwell at CB.
I haven’t checked but I’d imagine a Venn diagram of the people saying we don’t need a winger, and those saying we didn’t need a keeper before we signed Rushworth is a circleSaying we need a winger seems to bring out the remaining dwindling small % that actually think our strikers are good enough, despite actually watching them with their own eyes. We need both of those and a top quality CB to really compete.
Kind of pointless going in circles at this point, i choose to believe that the management aren't blind and are working on all 3 as well as some outwards transfers. Whether we get all that done remains to be seen though, you'd really hope to see at least 1 new face this week really.
You’ll have people like bali or Chris coming along telling you we shouldn’t be spending £1 on any of these positions and we’re good with what we haveSakamoto gets injured and we’re starting Raphael or KKH at RW.
EMC gets injured and we’re playing Brau or BTA on the left.
Both are quite grim prospects.
EMC, BTA, KKH, Raphael (his main position)Because it’s a reasonable scenario given EMC was out for a decent period last year.
you said we dont need a LW or RW.
you say we have plenty who can play RWas as a second position. Name them.
The same ones who thought we would bankrupt the club by signing a keeper on loanYou’ll have people like bali or Chris coming along telling you we shouldn’t be spending £1 on any of these positions and we’re good with what we have
No, it’s a number game. If you only have 2 wingers and also play a formation with 2 wingers, one injury forced you into playing players out of position or a formation change. Which is what happened last season.Saying we need a winger seems to bring out the remaining dwindling small % that actually think our strikers are good enough, despite actually watching them with their own eyes. We need both of those and a top quality CB to really compete.
Kind of pointless going in circles at this point, i choose to believe that the management aren't blind and are working on all 3 as well as some outwards transfers. Whether we get all that done remains to be seen though, you'd really hope to see at least 1 new face this week really.
We still have people asking for a back up keeper when we have 7 keepers. I dont think you should read too much into a lot on hereI haven’t checked but I’d imagine a Venn diagram of the people saying we don’t need a winger, and those saying we didn’t need a keeper before we signed Rushworth is a circle
nobody is saying having a squad of 33 first teamers ffs. That is a counter argument the king pilled anti signings brigade are banding aroundA lot of this faux panic is now taking the shape of ‘what happens if all of our players get injured’ or ‘what happens if all of our players are shite’.
Surely that’s just recruitment, and on a wider scale - football?
Unfortunately you can’t have a squad of 33 first teamers.
3 weeks left. 1 game in. We are ok.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
BingoA lot of this faux panic is now taking the shape of ‘what happens if all of our players get injured’ or ‘what happens if all of our players are shite’.
Surely that’s just recruitment, and on a wider scale - football?
Unfortunately you can’t have a squad of 33 first teamers.
3 weeks left. 1 game in. We are ok.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
So you want a back up winger ( both sides) a new CB and a Striker? Correct?No
nobody is saying having a squad of 33 first teamers ffs. That is a counter argument the king pilled anti signings brigade are banding around
sorry for not wanting my backup winger to be a player out of position, a player who’s never started a professional game in England or a RB
I look forward to you showing where i said that. If it was left to you we would still be making another 25 signings and then you would proceed to tell us how shit they all are after 1 game.You’ll have people like bali or Chris coming along telling you we shouldn’t be spending £1 on any of these positions and we’re good with what we have
No I’ve said many times. If we lose nobody a CB and a backup winger is fine.So you want a back up winger ( both sides) a new CB and a Striker? Correct?
Saying we need a winger is because we have no depth there whereas we have 5 CF’s…Saying we need a winger seems to bring out the remaining dwindling small % that actually think our strikers are good enough, despite actually watching them with their own eyes. We need both of those and a top quality CB to really compete.
Kind of pointless going in circles at this point, i choose to believe that the management aren't blind and are working on all 3 as well as some outwards transfers. Whether we get all that done remains to be seen though, you'd really hope to see at least 1 new face this week really.
Is this you trying to appear ITK as he’s playing in one of those FA free agent games today
25 signings, you are absolutely clueless. I wanted a maximum of 4/5 this windowI look forward to you showing where i said that. If it was left to you we would still be making another 25 signings and then you would proceed to tell us how shit they all are after 1 game.
I don't see him as a striker either but unfortunately frank does. Defo need some outgoings though.No I’ve said many times. If we lose nobody a CB and a backup winger is fine.
Ideally you lose a keeper, a LB, Allen and a striker and sign
a winger
A atriker
A cm
A cb
add MVE leaving you need a RB also.
I don’t see Haji as a striker, never have
I’m sure some on here wish Joy and Tim were back.
Some need a plastic bedsheet!!
Who even is it?Is this you trying to appear ITK as he’s playing in one of those FA free agent games today
The 10 is a really good point which hasn't been mentioned much. We certainly don't have a rudoni replacementWe are desperate for wingers and a 10, RW and LW ideally, hopefully can play 10 role also. We have no competent back up and would mean formation change if injuries hit.
CB - crucial as short. Ideally Hughes or Doyle. But an upgrade on what we have.
RB* depending if MVe goes.
so that’s 3/4 players, couple can be loans, but crucial for me.
then you can look a the nice to do stuff like Strikers, they only change if we ship off BTA/Simms or Bassette - otherwise it’s what we have.
Is this you trying to appear ITK as he’s playing in one of those FA free agent games today
It’s Fabio boriniWho even is it?
I think if we sold Rudoni for £15-20m and reinvested in a new RB/CB/winger/10/ we’d overall be stronger than if we just kept himWould people prefer to sell MVE and Rudoni and throw £20m at a random collection of players like the 2023/24?
Or keep the bulk of the squad that's got to the play offs and an FA Cup semi-final with a small number of additions?
Example being, look at impact palmer had Saturday, we are crying out for that as an option, different point. Would love COH in this team also.The 10 is a really good point which hasn't been mentioned much. We certainly don't have a rudoni replacement
Torp is the cover there. Shat ourselves when Rudoni got injured last year then Torp went and scored a brace.The 10 is a really good point which hasn't been mentioned much. We certainly don't have a rudoni replacement
When’s BTA off to Rangers?There are no more ITKs. Go outside.
palmer was shocking on SaturdayExample being, look at impact palmer had Saturday, we are crying out for that as an option, different point. Would love COH in this team also.
Oh yeah 100% agree but Rudoni is our most important player and doesn't seem to have been mentioned during the "need back up" panic. I wouldn't say Torp is the same kind of playerTorp is the cover there. Shat ourselves when Rudoni got injured last year then Torp went and scored a brace.
Also, who the hell are we to convince to join us to be on standby if Rudoni gets injured?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?