baldy
Well-Known Member
All gormless Bambis on ice
Bamford would be a decent signing, him simms and wright as depth for the ST is decent
Mate we get them 3 in I'm getting a stiffy
I know, I know mate but what if it did?I don’t think it’ll happen either, but I can dream.
I know, I know mate but what if it did?
Randy loving the Internet pornbrilliant episode
And don't forget Japanese puking aswell lolWe'll need age verification here soon
BRAZILIAN FART PORN
Wheres that been said£5.2m is bit of a joke for MVE.
The most boring take in the footballing world.Chelsea, have some very talented players, the Lampard connection could help us get one or two more in on loan.
He is rubbish. Barely played in last few yearsNot sure if its been mentioned but I couldn't see it. Seen one of those articles fishing, linking a player with 18 different clubs. An agents way of announcing a player is free and ready to sign type things. But the article (most likely written by ChatGPT) states that Derby, Oxford and Coventry are interested in CH Patrick Bauer after his contract at PNE has ended.
Like I say, most likely nothing to see here, but we do need some better cover at CH than Lati and Binks. 32 so plenty of experience.
Sent from my SM-S711B using Tapatalk
He is slow/injured a lot/shite - let's get it done....Not sure if its been mentioned but I couldn't see it. Seen one of those articles fishing, linking a player with 18 different clubs. An agents way of announcing a player is free and ready to sign type things. But the article (most likely written by ChatGPT) states that Derby, Oxford and Coventry are interested in CH Patrick Bauer after his contract at PNE has ended.
Like I say, most likely nothing to see here, but we do need some better cover at CH than Lati and Binks. 32 so plenty of experience.
Sent from my SM-S711B using Tapatalk
Doug will not entertainment that money, i would think no less than 7.5 mill with add ons and sell on fee.
This for MVE?£9m asking price it seems.
This for MVE?
Yes. We rejected the bid earlier this week.
That's quite a strong reaction to what I thought was a fairly straightforward observation! I wasn't suggesting anything groundbreaking - just that having someone with existing relationships at a club can sometimes open doors for loan deals. It happens all the time in football. But fair enough if you think it's boring - we clearly see it differently.The most boring take in the footballing world.
WHY DOESNT FRANK USE HIS CHELSEA CONNECTIONS
who from?
What you have described is exactly why its boring.That's quite a strong reaction to what I thought was a fairly straightforward observation! I wasn't suggesting anything groundbreaking - just that having someone with existing relationships at a club can sometimes open doors for loan deals. It happens all the time in football. But fair enough if you think it's boring - we clearly see it differently.
It’s also a little simplistic.What you have described is exactly why its boring.
it is a straightforward observation
Its been made one thousand times
I my view Frank's legendary status at Chelsea carries weight regardless of who's currently in charge. 211 goals and three Premier League titles don't just disappear because there's new ownership. That kind of institutional respect still matters in football, even if it's not some dramatic inside connection.It’s also a little simplistic.
There are no material ties between the current Chelsea manager or Frank, nor the current Chelsea Director or Football and Frank. Some of the youth players were not even living in this country when he was playing at Chelsea.
It’s a business deal and sentiment won’t play a part. It may have been different had Roman still owned the club, but he doesn’t.
That is a romantic view I’m afraid ….I my view Frank's legendary status at Chelsea carries weight regardless of who's currently in charge. 211 goals and three Premier League titles don't just disappear because there's new ownership. That kind of institutional respect still matters in football, even if it's not some dramatic inside connection.
We should wash our hands over that rumour.Isnt Bamford going to Burnely?
When it was rumoured that we were about to appoint Lampard there was a comment from a Chelsea fan, I think on Benjamin Bloom's YouTube channel, to not expect favours as Boehly has gone out of his way to break links with anyone seen as being close to Abramovic. And in his view this would include Lampard.I my view Frank's legendary status at Chelsea carries weight regardless of who's currently in charge. 211 goals and three Premier League titles don't just disappear because there's new ownership. That kind of institutional respect still matters in football, even if it's not some dramatic inside connection.
Boehly brought him in as caretaker at a difficult time... I'm not saying he'll have the pick of the parade, but I'm sure there is goodwill there.When it was rumoured that we were about to appoint Lampard there was a comment from a Chelsea fan, I think on Benjamin Bloom's YouTube channel, to not expect favours as Boehly has gone out of his way to break links with anyone seen as being close to Abramovic. And in his view this would include Lampard.
I think Boehly had Lampard on his yacht after sacking him as well. But the personal and the corporate Boehly are probably very different. He has been ruthless with some long serving staff that he saw as Abramovic's people.Boehly brought him in as caretaker at a difficult time... I'm not saying he'll have the pick of the parade, but I'm sure there is goodwill there.
Believe it when I see it.Mve 5
Hackney 20
Mmmmmmmm
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?