Transfer Rumour 25/26 Summer Transfer Window (133 Viewers)

Forums New posts
D

DT-R

Well-Known Member
Not sure if its been mentioned but I couldn't see it. Seen one of those articles fishing, linking a player with 18 different clubs. An agents way of announcing a player is free and ready to sign type things. But the article (most likely written by ChatGPT) states that Derby, Oxford and Coventry are interested in CH Patrick Bauer after his contract at PNE has ended.
Like I say, most likely nothing to see here, but we do need some better cover at CH than Lati and Binks. 32 so plenty of experience.

Sent from my SM-S711B using Tapatalk
 
P

procdoc

Well-Known Member
DT-R said:
Not sure if its been mentioned but I couldn't see it. Seen one of those articles fishing, linking a player with 18 different clubs. An agents way of announcing a player is free and ready to sign type things. But the article (most likely written by ChatGPT) states that Derby, Oxford and Coventry are interested in CH Patrick Bauer after his contract at PNE has ended.
Like I say, most likely nothing to see here, but we do need some better cover at CH than Lati and Binks. 32 so plenty of experience.

Sent from my SM-S711B using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
He is rubbish. Barely played in last few years
 
Sky Blue Harry H

Sky Blue Harry H

Well-Known Member
DT-R said:
Not sure if its been mentioned but I couldn't see it. Seen one of those articles fishing, linking a player with 18 different clubs. An agents way of announcing a player is free and ready to sign type things. But the article (most likely written by ChatGPT) states that Derby, Oxford and Coventry are interested in CH Patrick Bauer after his contract at PNE has ended.
Like I say, most likely nothing to see here, but we do need some better cover at CH than Lati and Binks. 32 so plenty of experience.

Sent from my SM-S711B using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
He is slow/injured a lot/shite - let's get it done....
 
ccfc1234

ccfc1234

Well-Known Member
Bigelvesy said:
The most boring take in the footballing world.

WHY DOESNT FRANK USE HIS CHELSEA CONNECTIONS
Click to expand...
That's quite a strong reaction to what I thought was a fairly straightforward observation! I wasn't suggesting anything groundbreaking - just that having someone with existing relationships at a club can sometimes open doors for loan deals. It happens all the time in football. But fair enough if you think it's boring - we clearly see it differently.
 
B

Bigelvesy

Well-Known Member
ccfc1234 said:
That's quite a strong reaction to what I thought was a fairly straightforward observation! I wasn't suggesting anything groundbreaking - just that having someone with existing relationships at a club can sometimes open doors for loan deals. It happens all the time in football. But fair enough if you think it's boring - we clearly see it differently.
Click to expand...
What you have described is exactly why its boring.
it is a straightforward observation
Its been made one thousand times
 
D

Deity

Well-Known Member
Bigelvesy said:
What you have described is exactly why its boring.
it is a straightforward observation
Its been made one thousand times
Click to expand...
It’s also a little simplistic.

There are no material ties between the current Chelsea manager or Frank, nor the current Chelsea Director or Football and Frank. Some of the youth players were not even living in this country when he was playing at Chelsea.

It’s a business deal and sentiment won’t play a part. It may have been different had Roman still owned the club, but he doesn’t.
 
ccfc1234

ccfc1234

Well-Known Member
Deity said:
It’s also a little simplistic.

There are no material ties between the current Chelsea manager or Frank, nor the current Chelsea Director or Football and Frank. Some of the youth players were not even living in this country when he was playing at Chelsea.

It’s a business deal and sentiment won’t play a part. It may have been different had Roman still owned the club, but he doesn’t.
Click to expand...
I my view Frank's legendary status at Chelsea carries weight regardless of who's currently in charge. 211 goals and three Premier League titles don't just disappear because there's new ownership. That kind of institutional respect still matters in football, even if it's not some dramatic inside connection.
 
D

Deity

Well-Known Member
ccfc1234 said:
I my view Frank's legendary status at Chelsea carries weight regardless of who's currently in charge. 211 goals and three Premier League titles don't just disappear because there's new ownership. That kind of institutional respect still matters in football, even if it's not some dramatic inside connection.
Click to expand...
That is a romantic view I’m afraid ….
 
C

CovRes

Well-Known Member
ccfc1234 said:
I my view Frank's legendary status at Chelsea carries weight regardless of who's currently in charge. 211 goals and three Premier League titles don't just disappear because there's new ownership. That kind of institutional respect still matters in football, even if it's not some dramatic inside connection.
Click to expand...
When it was rumoured that we were about to appoint Lampard there was a comment from a Chelsea fan, I think on Benjamin Bloom's YouTube channel, to not expect favours as Boehly has gone out of his way to break links with anyone seen as being close to Abramovic. And in his view this would include Lampard.
 
Mcbean

Mcbean

Well-Known Member
The best thing is there is no news - as we know to our peril that a leak generally finds our target at another team !
 
lord_garrincha

lord_garrincha

Well-Known Member
CovRes said:
When it was rumoured that we were about to appoint Lampard there was a comment from a Chelsea fan, I think on Benjamin Bloom's YouTube channel, to not expect favours as Boehly has gone out of his way to break links with anyone seen as being close to Abramovic. And in his view this would include Lampard.
Click to expand...
Boehly brought him in as caretaker at a difficult time... I'm not saying he'll have the pick of the parade, but I'm sure there is goodwill there.
 
C

CovRes

Well-Known Member
lord_garrincha said:
Boehly brought him in as caretaker at a difficult time... I'm not saying he'll have the pick of the parade, but I'm sure there is goodwill there.
Click to expand...
I think Boehly had Lampard on his yacht after sacking him as well. But the personal and the corporate Boehly are probably very different. He has been ruthless with some long serving staff that he saw as Abramovic's people.
I don't think Boehly would block a loan, but I also don't think he'd intervene on Frank's behalf to send a player here.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

  • ... and 11 more.
    • Total: 130 (members: 52, guests: 78)
    Top