What paid for Grimes in that case?
keep telling yourself that, but that has diddly squat to do with my pointI really don't but thanks for your input.
I have a sneaky feeling we might get that George from ChelseaWhat do we actually need desperately if no outgoings?
Just a RW to battle it out with saka?
Two of those are kids.I said it was too strong and below average/poor was fair
Binks Raphael BTA and Bassette were the other 4 signings that summer.
We also spent about £5 million combined on BTA and Bassette which seems like questionable business (but could also shake out as OK)We signed theee first team players Rudoni EMC and Dovin, all were a success really. Just cos you don’t think Luis Bunks is an amazing backup for £1m doesn’t mean recruitment was “ridiculous”
Would be a unreal signing thatI have a sneaky feeling we might get that George from Chelsea
What paid for Grimes in that case?
Just think they’ve beefed up their forward options this summer.Would be a unreal signing that
cluelessI said it was too strong and below average/poor was fair
Binks Raphael BTA and Bassette were the other 4 signings that summer.
The Vik sale, if it happens, gets the club about £4 million. Yet it hasn’t actually happened yet and we also spent a similar sum on Grimes and KKH each.Saddle definitely gets info but like fuck does his source know the exact financial details I’m sorry. He said in Jan we were skint then said we were skint again. I can believe it’s one in one out for squad and wage reasons it because we’ve run out of transfer funds.
A contribution sure, but for about half the fee at most.I would imagine Palmer's fee and wages at least contributed somewhat - albeit we only received £1m so it wouldn't have been much
I'd imagine George would absolutely smash the league apartJust think they’ve beefed up their forward options this summer.
think it’s one of those that with FL we could possibly get done
Depending on their dealings he maybe too close to their 1st teamI'd imagine George would absolutely smash the league apart
Sorry but some folks need to start engaging some critical thinking when it comes to "ITKs".
Based on the sheer range of information they talk to with such conviction (details of finances and deals, impending player ins and outs, player moods and thoughts), the only possible person who could be their source is the all seeing eyes of God.
A contribution sure, but for about half the fee at most.
Ive been told this morning that unless its frees or loans, no one else is coming in until we've offloaded some
Probably not groundbreaking info, but the issue is no ones attracted even a bid yet. Not even Milan
In fairness to Saddlebrains, he probably does view Richard Overson as some kind of godSorry but some folks need to start engaging some critical thinking when it comes to "ITKs".
Based on the sheer range of information they talk to with such conviction (details of finances and deals, impending player ins and outs, player moods and thoughts), the only possible person who could be their source is the all seeing eyes of God.
I don't believe his source knows financial details either, never have. It would make sense as a piece of guesswork though, it's why I don't understand anyone wanting to keep around 2 of the best RBs in the division. It's a complete waste for us and we'd be better off with the MvE money imo.Saddle definitely gets info but like fuck does his source know the exact financial details I’m sorry. He said in Jan we were skint then said we were skint again. I can believe it’s one in one out for squad and wage reasons it because we’ve run out of transfer funds.
I assumed we’d have seen MVE out by now. The plan surely cannot be to have both of them.I don't believe his source knows financial details either, never have. It would make sense as a piece of guesswork though, it's why I don't understand anyone wanting to keep around 2 of the best RBs in the division. It's a complete waste for us and we'd be better off with the MvE money imo.
I'm saying this is the case here but there is a fear of not being important if you don't have any "info"I don't believe his source knows financial details either, never have. It would make sense as a piece of guesswork though, it's why I don't understand anyone wanting to keep around 2 of the best RBs in the division. It's a complete waste for us and we'd be better off with the MvE money imo.
Tbf Chelsea buy everyone, wouldnt be suprised if they loan us George and brought in 5 players in his place lolDepending on their dealings he maybe too close to their 1st team
I'd give a seriously good handy to anyone willing to take Simms or BTA too. Thus allowing us to try again for someone half decent.I assumed we’d have seen MVE out by now. The plan surely cannot be to have both of them.
I assumed we’d have seen MVE out by now. The plan surely cannot be to have both of them.
are they not one of the teams uefa has said needs to post a positive transfer balance or face sanctionsTbf Chelsea buy everyone, wouldnt be suprised if they loan us George and brought in 5 players in his place lol
I think MR could definitely be persuaded to return for BTA. If we break even on Simms I’d be surprised.I'd give a seriously good handy to anyone willing to take Simms or BTA too. Thus allowing us to try again for someone half decent.
@Saddlebrains any news on loanees or if Doug is going to allow any ?
Think we still need a decent CB and an attacking midfielder.
Rest of the squad has improvement in it and if we start well will push at the right end of the table
They've got to sell now or they will be in trouble, I read somewhere they need to raise 60m in players salesare they not one of the teams uefa has said needs to post a positive transfer balance or face sanctions
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?