Got any proof or data?
www.euronews.com
Where have i said that, your just making stories. What about the illegal barbers, takeaway, restaurant workers, car wash workers. Probably millions here we don't know about. As for the poor Christian Iraqi girl, where have I said cases like that are not allowed. Its sounds like you want open borders and anyone can come in.
Sweden to track refugees travelling to their home countries - Euractiv Sweden to track refugees travelling to their home countries - EuractivYou’ll be shocked to hear he got it from Elon Musk
Do most refugees in Sweden holiday back home, as Elon Musk claims?
The South Africa-born billionaire's claim that refugees in Sweden are playing the system has gone viral, but the catchy 79% figure has been taken out of context. #EuroVerify
www.euractiv.com
Millions?!
Sweden to track refugees travelling to their home countries - Euractiv Sweden to track refugees travelling to their home countries - Euractiv
No from here
Sweden to track refugees travelling to their home countries - Euractiv
“That there is abuse, I dare to claim. But it’s hard to say how widespread it is."
I mean he’s yet another poster who says ‘HA! Guess you want open borders and a free for all!!!!!’ if you don’t agree that asylum seekers are vermin.
I've not told a single person to piss off! For about the 4th time in this thread alone, I've been pretty clear that anyone here already can stay. I'm not sure if youre being purposely selective or aiming to make out ive implied otherwise. There's a huge difference between saying no more immigration and all immigrants must leave, but you already know that.
What I meant by the comment was that you don’t want anyone else coming in, so you’d have also refused the asylum seeking family in question. Or have I misunderstood what ‘no more immigration at all’ meant?
But then you wouldn't have been able to fabricate perfectly timed little anecdotes as you'd never have met her.
It isn’t fabricated whatsoever.
The goalposts moved once again, in a thread where the uproar is specifically over asylum seekers.
Not by me. Go back a few pages and I said they account for about 4% its the balance we should be concentrating on.
Your stance is just a bit confusing. You want better pay and conditions for sectors where we’re reliant on foreign labour, I’m with you there. But you also oppose the political parties and bodies who are calling for that to happen?
Because I don't trust them to deliver it and I also think they back open borders. I've said before im politically homeless.
Mixed tbh. I can see aspects of use, but in general growth encourages increase in costs and services, so people need more to pay for them and on it spirals.
I seem to remember that there was a lot of talk about India demanding visas at that point.So we need to keep importing hundreds of thousands of students a year to keep unis afloat and hundreds of thousands of workers to pay the pensions of the elderly and increasing welfare bill
How the fuck is this efficient or sustainable(not having a go at you Dave, just the logic of how we’re seemingly running the country…basically just kicking the can !)
ps sunak was 100% correct to change student visas as like with other stuff the system was being gamed…
‘In recent years, there's been a significant increase in the number of dependents accompanying students on UK student visas. For example, in the year ending September 2023, nearly a quarter (24%) of all sponsored study-related visas granted were to dependents of students. This is a substantial rise from 5% in 2019.’
Your stance on immigration says you’re anti. Growth doesn’t mean automatic increase in costs, at least not when measured against other metrics.
I said at the start, at least you’re honest rather than a pure contrarian. But given that I genuinely believe you’re wrong it’s more than a ‘Poundland Grendel’ argument from me.