Search results

Sshhh! You'll get shot.

You know it hasn't. Why dance around with the stupid question.

IIRC it was used by TF as an example of how they're turning around the club that they're about to oversee a second relegation with. Dave Johnson also had to challenge him that it was EBIT and TF made no mention of it being swallowed up by losses so being an irrelevant point in the first place...

Again. So why bragg about it like it's a measurement of success? Unless he wants to look a c**t of course.

How to make a c**t out of yourself the easy way. Bragg about £1M profit on live radio like it's a measure of success when you're sitting rock bottom of the league and staring relegation in the face. Be forced to admit it's EBIT on same live radio show so actually it probably means fuck all...

Based on our league form this season we'll be lucky to finish on 34 points. On that basis we're down already and climb a maximum of one place as it stands.

It would be funny if no one turned up to hear what he has to say. Could be quite a strong message that no one is interested in what he has to say either.

It doesn't matter what SISU do now they 've crossed too many lines and the only thing that the club can do under their guidance is die. If you haven't already woken up to that reality it's time too. Getting rid of Fisher, getting rid of the manager, getting rid of Oggy, better communication or...

I thought directors wages were lumped in with the general wages all under the one heading? If it specifically says director payments would that not be separate to wages?

Whose expectation?

If we we're still in league two in two years time under new owners that would most likely be a league or two higher than we would under SISU in that same period. This decline under SISU is speeding up if you didn't notice.

The JR is about a specific set of events involving specific interested parties during a specific time scale so yes they can continue with it as they are one of said specific interested parties. Continual ownership after the event is neither here or there as I understand it.

Don't dispute that but you could say the same about the games Slade has won, or drawn for that matter.

You can only see that getting worse as well.

That's a valid point. Venus managed to get some new manager bounce out of the player's he inherited but Slade didn't. Why not? No new player bounce either from the players he's signed. If anything we've gone backwards in every aspect.

We did but we also retained the services of our best player in AA. It's not like we lost our best player and replaced him with far less superior players. We sold Maddison but retained his services for the remainder of the season. I'm not saying last January was a success story, it wasn't .Well...

We didn't even get a new manager bounce that's how infective he's been. The team he inherited looked immediately worse than it did under either Venus or Mowbray and he happily offloaded our best player (not a hard task, I'll give you that) in Sordel and replaced him with worse players in what...

It's looking that way. Said a few weeks in that he's reminding me of Thorn, not sure he's that good to be honest. Certainly on league form he isn't. If he'd come in after the window and just had to work with what he was given I'd have some sympathy for him but that isn't the case. He's made...

Sounds like a protest actually helps the team after all. We at least draw or only lose by one goal when we protest. So todays performance is still the blame of the protesters for not protesting and making us play worse than when they do protest. Bloody fickle non protesting fans.

Think it was more a case of coming over here and making use of an empty shop. Pretty sure the sports shop was long gone when they moved in.