Search results

Eustace wouldn't be the worst idea. 66% win record at Kidderminster and his contract is up at the end of the season.

You keep saying that like it's a complement to SISU. This is exactly why AT was here too long, AB was here too long, SP was here too long. If TM wasn't such a decent chap would he still be here? And more recently Venus was in the caretakers position too long not only possibly losing us a better...

Could have been. I remember someone doing it just after being appointed.

Didn't he promptly go on holiday as well or did I imagine that?

Nilsson has also done well pretty much everywhere since. Personally, if we had progressive owners looking to do a JH type revolution with real ambition of climbing the league tables Nilsson would be first choice manager to do that under.

You mean when SISU turned up? Common denominator and all that.

It would be an improvement on just bust ;)

Wouldn't holding on to managers too long be symptomatic of "another reason for our continuing failure"?

Yeah but how many of those above us have made £1M profit. I bet they're all jealous of us.

The biggest similarity being that if Yakubu does hit the ground running and start banging them in its come to late.

Anything to put... ...you bastard Moff. That's my line. Actually, wait. No it's Nick's line. The baton has been passed once again. The next leg is yours ;)

Pollination? What do Bee's have to do with this? Anyway, the parliamentary time is being allocated anyway as it would be a small part of a bigger committee. You seem to be saying that time should be allotted for the Oystons but not Seppala. Why the double standard? You now apparently know what...

The Oystons should be called in, I'll agree with you on that. But if you really believe that they're an exception then you're seriously in denial of what's happening to our club and others.

So CCC will get back every cost monetary? The time spent on it? The time lost to other areas of their responsibilities? Don't accuse me of making stuff up when you're in denial of what defending the JR's required. They'll having their legal costs recovered. Nothing else.

You made the statement not me. Of course we're an example of failure in football governance. As is Blackpool, Leyton, Leeds, Portsmouth (repeatedly), MK Dons, Charlton, Blackburn, Northampton etc. etc.

Yet you championed the JR that cost CCC in time, energy and money. Funny you didn't have an issue with that cost to a public body but draw a line when one of the other parties responsible in our decline could be held to account. It's almost as if you want to load the blame on one particular...

I can't work out if this is supposed to be a serious question or not from a CCFC fan.