Search results

As a fan did you nominate ACL to be the moral bastions? Because I certainly fucking didn't. Here's an idea - leave the football governance to the appropriate authorities, let ACL worry about finding someone to use their fucking stadium. The second points deduction lies clearly at the feet...

Probably one similar to the one that was due to happen back in 2012 as a starting point. But whatever the deal the rejection ramped up the hatred to a new level.

Because I believe they may have been able to negotiate a deal if it hadn't happened as it did. That's merely my opinion. ACL turned down the maximum amount they could get remember.

Maybe because they lost their anchor tenant. IMHO if the CVA had been accepted, ACL would have their money and we would be back at the Ricoh by now.

If he was prepared to apologise to the fans and admit he was wrong I'd take him back in a heartbeat. Not saying he would actually do that of course.

The 'legal' reason is merely a request - not like you implied in your statement. As for the FL rules, they themselves circumvented their own guidance as it was an exceptional circumstance. The only thing the 'request' implies is that they didn't want the JR, which is fair enough...

Legal reasons?? As I have said before... If they believed that something illegal happened in the admin process they should have reported Appleton to the appropriate authorities. FL Rules? Firstly what jurisdiction do ACL have in the football world? Secondly by going into admin the club was...

If ACL rejected an offer from the administrator that gave them the maximum amount payable to them, then how would a revised offer be any better? If they has already been offered the best financial deal in first place, then what reasons did they have to reject it? After all their primary...

ACL rejected the CVA - causing a 10pt deduction this season. I believe that is what they are referring to.

Did you steal that from 'The Thick of It'?

I think out where the old Peugeot plant was is the limit that way for me. (My uncle and grandad both worked there, and it's them I have to thank for supporting CCFC) This side of the M6 is ok but nothing over.

I agree - some people think the deadline was 31st May, some people think it is at the end of the liquidation. No one appears to have anything conclusive that says one way or the other. Was the 31st May mentioned as it was expected that the liquidation would have been done and dusted by now, and...

Does that explain why they don't seem too perturbed by it all? If they haven't disclosed the full terms to anyone, how do we know that the deadline is 31st May as opposed to end of the liquidation? Just thinking out loud.

I couldn't find it either. Was interested if it said anything in it about the liquidator being in control of the payment to ACL.

Congrats....

As I've said before - I don't think a new stadium is necessary, but the club does have to have financial control of the Ricoh as a whole.. which may well be achievable with a long term lease. However the point I was trying to make is that if this can't be achieved, then I would take a new...

It would make a lot of sense if someone confirmed how much money was put into the escrow account. Also, does anyone actually have a copy of the exact conditions that SISU had to adhere to in order to receive the GS? The football league statement at the time doesn't say anything about and...

He asked for feedback, if he means that it needs to be clearer. No one wants a stadium outside of Coventry, but if it is on the edge like Ricoh, what's the problem? Hence my question.

And then you use the line 'pro team' and 'pro club' - not too much contradiction there.