Search results

Er... the campaign group is 'Keep Cov in Cov' - if the club return to Coventry then what is the problem? Or is just about boycotting because Michael will only support owners that say he can be in control of a little bit of it.

I agree about the last part - very confusing. So was the FL charge connected to the liquidation or not? No one seems to know. As for the 300K, the rates rebate to CCFC.. are these all coming out as the liquidator digs further? Why can't Appleton come out and make a statement and say what is...

Keep the yellow one - my favourite away kit ever.

Although no one really thinks a new stadium will be built... if one was built why on earth would you boycott it??

In addition - would it not be very difficult for the FL to impose a sanction on something that is outside of their (and the club's control)?

What? They were guarantors for the rent not being paid. The amount agreed by FL was in relation to unpaid rent. So although not directly linked they are obviously connected. So are you happy that ACL get an extra 300K for nothing?? Also - In Simons article it says in the final part that the...

So have we already had a points deduction or are you merely guessing again? At no point have I ever said that SISU shouldn't pay the money to ACL. What I do think should happen is that when SISU pay the 590K - then the 300K should really be returned to Robinson/McGinnity. Or would you be happy...

Could he have dual citizenship (one part being European) that allows him to circumvent work permits etc?

Was actually just hoping to hear a) if it's been paid b) why is the liquidation not done. I'm a bit bored of trying to guess and read conspiracy theories the Illuminati would be proud of.

People have to do what is right for them. Not going because you believe they shouldn't leave their home town is perfectly understandable, I would never criticise someone for making that choice. The point I was making is that the idea SISU could be financially starved out as a result of NOPM...

Without sidetracking the conversation, you could say exactly the same about the CVA rejection. No one benefitted from it, so why do it??

If it came down to either CCFC or ACL going bust... See ya ACL. I'm sure it's the same for you too, but I don't believe everyone feels the same.

It makes sense what you say, but then you just get the impression that people are more happy that ACL's actions protect their private company , at the detriment of CCFC.

Very true... So does that show NOPM as a financial constrait is futile, and the only impact is in terms of the continued absence of the majority of fans?

Does the article actually say when they paid the money? How recent was it?

But 60000 other people did. Which probably undone an entire season of NOPM.

So I see you all traveled to the future to read the article before coming back here to tell us what it says.... :whistle:

I was under the impression the lease was broken with the admin. Didn't the club have to negotiate a deal for last 3 home games of that season?

Which why launching the process towards admin in the first place was strange from ACL. Surely they would have known a) the lease would be broken and b) they would have never got back what they were owed.

So as someone has previously said - this could well be the reason that the liquidation hasn't occured. Aside from that - if the club is owed the money, they should have it.. irrespective of who owns it. How anyone can make a case for the club not having it is beyond me.