Search results

Ideally our club should have a model that leans towards rewarding success. If you were to offer players the opportunity to double their yearly salary if they achieve promotion that would be a win-win situation for all parties. Other bonuses, incentives etc for progress on the pitch.

I don't think he plays in the right position to be an effective captain. He will always try to lead by example but doesn't see enough of the game from where he is.

Wish we had more players that were as committed to the club as him.

The fact that the money is with the FL means that ACL should be dropping that condition from their openness to negotiation. All that then remains is for SISU to end the appeal and it can begin.

When I read some of those comments on the CET page I think 'you actually care more about hating SISU than CCFC returning back to Coventry' Personally I have not been particularly enthused by the SBT in the past, but their letter is exactly what was needed - it was pertinent and relevant to the...

SISU are going nowhere anytime soon. Only realistically going to leave if we become successful on the pitch and they can sell on at a decent price.

So now the fickle turn on the SBT. You couldn't make it up.

Very good letter.

Let's hope not.

Last week the football league said just that. http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/coventry-news/cash-row-between-coventry-city-7408563

The point I was trying to make is that even if ACL and SISU agree to get together - you are then waiting on a third party. Also.. I don't see why Michael making a statement on the situation is of any importance or consequence. It's not his call is it?

Why would you do that? If the money is with the FL why can you not take that as sufficient?

Exactly... this is why that part of their conditions should be waived. Now it's up to SISU to drop the appeal.

The monies transfer is not in SISU's control is it? The FL are controlling that part now. So it would involve the FL being part of that arrangement wouldn't it?

Quite frankly - the FL put the agreement in place... it is theirs to manage. As long as SISU have done what the FL expect and the club is free of sanctions I couldn't care less. It is up to ACL to arrange the transfer of the monies from FL. If everything was crystal clear then surely they would...

Thanks for that.... you know full well that even if SISU did drop the JR appeal today that not all of those conditions could be met by Friday. Stop talking shit.

The JR showed that CCC/ACL acted lawfully. So you are happy for this 'legal process' to occur and produce that result. But now you want 'legal process' to be ignored just so ACL get some money. Absurd.

You mean the judge that has had no involvement in the CVA or subsequent deal that came out of it's rejection? He might have given a scathing review of SISU in relation to the JR but it's not relevant in this particular scenario. I don't understand why you keep going over the same bit...

If they have any sense they will buy the latter option.