Search results

I still think SISU were right in doing so, it was a gamble that didn't pay off, but a gamble worth taking, I wouldn't be surprised at the reaction if ACL was an independent private company, but they're not, and the way they are portrayed you'd think they gave us the ground for free, the...

Which we don't know at the minute, unfortunately.

As Grendel said, who's it acceptable to? You? ACL? A L1 football club? Like I said, the past is the past, if SISU come back, seemingly with its tail between its leg to renegotiate, why did ACL reject the approach to negotiate? If they accepted yet couldn't come to an agreement for whatever...

Is the administrator in control of the club though? Only 1/2 of the club is in admin.

When you throw statistics in there, it looks like a decent offer, the context of the situation is that it's unsatisfactory for a L1 club, and people will say who's fault is that? Well, wouldn't this be the time to offer CCFC a hand to help the, get back into the Championship so we can carry on...

Possibly, but, how can we get agreements elsewhere then?

But it's worth it now isn't it!

You bleed sky blue? Yet won't go to a game in say, Brum... Great supporter. Like my mate who's a Man U fan who said he's 'die hard'... Hasn't been to 10 league games (he can afford it, has had the opportunities, just hasn't gone, at least my glory supporting friend who supports Arsenal goes...

They haven't said they're evicting us, but they rejected an offer to renegotiate, so they kind of have evicted us if they don't want to renegotiate a new deal to stay.

When they first came in they did invest, Dann and Fox straight away, Gunnar, Eastwood, Clingan, Best (paid unpaid fees) etc. there's nearly 3m in 2 windows, and that isn't all of them. I mentioned PH4 because of the nature of your post, you portrayed SISU as being unique in this, there's no...

True, but now they approached ACL to renegotiate, but have been rejected, you can no longer portray the, as the bad guy in this, how do we know what would've happened, unprofessional behaviour from ACL and had it been the other way round, many on here would be up in arms, oh well, hypocrisy is a...

So what would you do if the club is being forced out then? Do we break into the RICOH to play our home games then!? If ACL won't renegotiate, what can be done, there is no adequate facility available in Coventry, so you'd have to go elsewhere, I guess you're conveniently missing this out...

It's flawed logic, if we're being forced out, what can we do!? The past is the past, if ACL want to play sour grapes by rejecting approaches for negotiations, what can the club do!? Answer that one.

That's short term when temporarily in whoever's stadium. After the ground move, in our own 'south Warwickshire' stadium, we'd get about 10k if the people boycotting came back when we came back to Cov, and then, you'd have to factor in revenue made from games, at RICOH, we'd only get ticket...

You think PH4 wouldn't want to make profit from the club? Are you that naive? Texan (USA, land of slaves to money) property developer (do I need to explain this?) - obviously in it for the money, why do you think people invest? To make a loss? Please. Why do you think he wants to secure a 50%...

Well it's more sustainable than paying 1.28m p/a whilst getting no revenue from it, in essence, we've been paying around 1.3-1.8m p/a because we get no revenue (I've put a 500k approx difference because attendance were high to start with, now are low, so it's worth less than when we first moved...

We'll see about that, it's like the boycotters, they say it's out of principle, they just can't be bothered, if you were THAT bothered, then you would still go games to support the club and you'd vent your discontent into singing SISU out songs etc. If people are willing to go to an away game...

With the amount of support ACL get, you could probably get an ACL FC team going, could that imagine that derby? Old Firm eat your heart out.

Do people not understand the meaning of 'temporary'? Clearly it isn't a permanent move and actually, if you look at the reaction of a possible ground share, it isn't 'I can't go because I can't get there' which would be fair enough, I probably won't get a ST because I wouldn't be able to go as...

You tell me, backing a joint venture company over your club isn't a good start (not directly aimed at you, just a general comment).