Search results

Guess that's what Doncaster thought :\ I'm not going to change your mind, but I'll ask this question: Who do you consider to be better: Fleck, Barton and another CM (e.g. Thomas) or a combination of; Ball, Cody, Wilson or Philliskirk?

Are you saying my post is illogical, or the business decision of SISU sponsoring the kit? It's a wind-up, it's gotta be.

SP has, but when you missing a 20-goal-a-season striker, with no adequate replacement, you're going to feel it and struggle, look v Orient, Philliskirk should've scored, if Clarke was there, you couldn't help but think he would've scored, we would've been 1-0 up and that's the difference. SP...

What we have got is a good set of midfielders, Fleck, Moussa, Barton, Thomas and Jennings (overall he's a good season) whereas we have 1 good striker, who's injured. We had a big striker front Ball (who was poor), Cody, who doesn't suit our style and needs a big striker with him, which we don't...

It doesn't help when you have the arguably the best striker in the league out does it?

Lower rent, backdated rent arrears, 100% F&B revs and need for share in ACL. Hypothetical situation: PH4 said no takeover unless he doesn't get the above, I would guarantee that almost 90% of the 'ACL camp' (hate this branding business btw) would hop on the PH4 bandwagon, I'd be on PH4's...

SISU got took to court as a result...

I was only opposed to it because it was taxpayers' money who paid for it, I don't see how the CCC can justify spending that money in times of 'prosperity', let alone austerity! If the CCC have done something wrong according to the law, which we are all bound to live by, they should be punished...

Thank you BSB.

Essentially, you agree with the crux of SISU's argument, but you only oppose the argument because of SISU, wouldn't it void your argument?

That sir, makes you a hypocrite, end of discussion now. Hey, at least you answered honestly.

... And you've deliberately ignored the question because we all know what your answer will be. You've got yourself in a pickle, I await your reply.

At least we had Elliott then! He was distinctly average, but better than Wilson, Philliskirk, Cody and Ball!

SISU have been investing in the club off the field before relegation, but for some fans, they aren't happy unless we spend a minimum of 10m in the transfer window as well as keeping all of our best players (slightly exaggerated, but don't ignore the point) but it simply isn't realistic...

Carsley didn't want the job. So CCFC didn't write him off, he simply didn't want the job. LC also had Leon at his disposal.

Did he say anything about playing away to Yeovil? He said playing 1 striker makes it easy for the opposition, which is simply untrue as playing 1 striker IS The way forward now. I think you'll find we've generally done better playing 4-5-1 this season.

If he works on his distribution, he could be a good player for CCFC. Besides, nothing has been agreed yet.

Opponents certainly had it easy with McG and Clarke upfront on their own didn't they!? :facepalm: ... Like Bayern Munich, Man U, Man City, Dortmund, AC Milan, Real Madrid, Chelsea, Liverpool (as in Sturridge or Suarez, when both play, Suarez is CAM!), Spurs, Arsenal, Spain, France, Germany...

4 goals in how many appearances? Is he worth keeping? Not if SP wants to bring in any new faces. Besides, I reckon he's watched lots of DVDs/videos of the teams games to get an idea of individual players, style etc. If McSheffrey gets offered a new deal, I'll be disappointed, I hoped to...

One other reason being predecessors mismanagement of the club, if you must know.