Search results

But if Fisher doesn't have the authority to broker a deal with ACL is it not irrelevant whether Fisher wants to leave the RICOH or not? So when ACL say we're welcome to play at the RICOH is that not an empty statement because if they can't/won't speak to SISU/Cov Holdings anyway? If CCFC...

Also, may I add, I don't think the stadium, if actually built, wold be 15k, It would have to be 20k at a minimum it can't and won't be under HR's attendance and if SISU had any intention of moving up the FL ladder, 15k would be too small.

Mr Musicman, do you happen to be the guy they talk about in The King Blues song 'Mr. Musicman'? ;)

Good points, but, not relevant to my point because it would be a home you intend to keep for the your life, not what you'd develop before selling.

How do we economically benefit from the RICOH whilst renting (purely renting it, nothing else) it? Then, how would would that outweigh owning your own stadium (assuming we own 100%)?

I wish I knew that! It's hands down my most boring subject as well :mad:

Tried doing that for Spurs away, it was a disaster.

Where did I say I followed it? I just said it's more economically viable than renting... I never said its more viable than buying a share in ACL, then maybe 100% one day in my lifetime off a stadium that is a goldmine (that's why rich people have considered investing in us, same for SISU as...

If we owned ACL we'd own the RICOH because ACL would probably be dissolved after.

But we only earn off 23 days a year anyway, but minus the rent revenue we'd get off F&B, parking* etc. than at the RICOH, plus the rent we have to pay. We'd still be able to hold conferences, would only be a small audience but we'd still get some money from it. The question isn't whether...

You think the council will sell for a fair price to CCFC? Bearing in mind Cllor Maton said he doesn't want CCFC to own the RICOH, just one man's comments, but, it could be reflective of the mood of the council.

How representative is it though? I didn't answer it yet I'd try my best to go. If there were a clear, genuine plan to return to the city then I don't see why people would oppose such a measure, obviously, if you can't go because of a move, that's fair enough. Anyway, I personally don't think...

No, on the 19th of June - but a massive syllabus and to know that 80% of what I'm going to revise won't be in the exam is demoralising.

I got exams so no.

I know we have shit support but 1000? No way, if we're doing well, we'll get a decent support I think (but in the bigger picture, still poor), it's like those people who boycott now yet I bet they went to Crewe at home! You don't just find 22k fans just like that! Whatever our current...

Most important part of any club, although it's particularly neglecting in the English top tier. Barcelona had 6-7 (maybe more?) academy players in the CL winning lineups.

No, they'd say 'why the fuck did we pay anything for him' - just like us about Eastwood!

Do you need to turn on sticky keys?

70% of our support wouldn't disappear if we moved into 'south Warwickshire', it would whilst we played outside the city though. In fact, I think Fisher's estimate of 7k if we're doing well is reasonable, I think of we were winning the league we'd get a good attendance - success would make these...

Hang on, are you saying we wouldn't be better off owning are own ground, even if it were some basic 20-25k stadium? If so, no wonder people like yourself are opposed to CCFC! Look, when renting the RICOH, we get nothing from stadium events nor match day revenue, but if we owned our stadium...