Search results

I used to work for ACL and have defected to SISU :facepalm: Seriously though, I criticise ACL because they need to be scrutinised as some people on here believe ACL are absolutely blameless and whatever SISU do is wrong, put in very broad terms. I have criticised SISU in the past, I said...

You're missing the point here, my point has nothng to with the rejection of an offer ACL deemed reasonable, my point is about future events which involve ACL rejecting an approach to negotiate a rent agreement, because ACL rejected that, Fisher's comments saying we've been forced out is...

What I was saying that the club had eaten humble pie and asked to renegotiate, but ACL rejected that approach, so if what I have said is true, then whatis the alternative. My proof was a CET article, I think the one where ACL confirmed negotiations were off, now, I found that article, but...

The local media should have been doing some investigating on this whole fiasco, but I'm guessing they may not have a budget to facilitate this, I don't know. Why does it not suggest they weren't going to compromise? I personally think that the approach to renegotiate was a desperate...

Given that ACL rejected the approaches meaning that a deal for a rent agreement for CCFC at the RICOH could not be achieved, and no facility in Coventry is fit to host CCFC match fixtures, the logical thing to do is to move out of the city temporarily. Would you like to propose an alternative?

But that was in the past, when SISU came back and asked for a renegotiation, it would suggest that they were willing to compromise, but because ACL rejected it, we don't know if SISU had intentions to compromise, if ACL had accepted and SISU didn't compromise etc. then that last comment would be...

Like my post said, when CCFC/SISU came back (tail between legs) and asked for a renegotiation, it was ACL who rejected it, and that's when this ground share possibility escalated, ACL forced us out. Ideally, we all want CCFC to own the RICOH outright, but, that does appear to be a very...

Well said. I suppose the club haven't really got a choice, since it was ACL who rejected the opportunity to renegotiate.

This a joke? I think he'd be a very good signing. That Maghoma has had a storming season and is attracting interest all over, besides, just because a player came from the league below, doesn't mean he's not good enough i.e. any non league player who's done well in the FL (Austin), or...

But by doing so brings CCFC to it's knees, and a less proposition to potential investors, surely? Lets also consider who will replace them, if anyone is truly serious, I think they'll be in control, or close to be being in control of the club by the start of the season at maximum.

'Inside Track' said when people assumed she was a he.

The bolded is absolutely class, I'm still chuckling at it now. It's shame that some seemingly intelligent (others not so) people can't comprehend that these are problems that will remain with or without SISU so this anti-SISU rally over this is pointless and short-sighted because I hope...

I do hope that is a joke? You can't be serious, right?

The consensus at the minute is all but an anti-SISU protest, whilst there are more than valid reasons to be dissatisfied with SISU, doesn't mean we should cease to see sense, that being that CCFC are being ripped off by ACL whoever the owners is.

I wonder how many people will be boycotting if we have a stormer and are winning a large % of games 'home' and away, wherever we play and whoever is in charge.

PSGM needs to fuck off, Nick, ban him!

Now you're on about the bailout, a complete waste of taxpayers' money! Why couldn't the CCC have helped us out pre 2005 in a similar way? All the bailout has done is made the distant dream of CCFC owning the RICOH an even more distant dream, even if this PH4/other owners come into town, the CCC...

I'll do my best to go no matter where we play.

A moot point though, because no one has disputed the legality of debt collection, well, I haven't, if I were negotiating the arrears are the only thing I'd reluctantly compromise is the arrears, although I think they should be backdated to the new agreed rent and from when we stop paying, but...