Search results

Anything that excludes any group of voters is preposterous. Besides, our voting is done by secret ballot so what’s stopping any one saying they voted Leave when they didn’t.

With another public vote? Yes. You know where I stand on this. What next? Are elections that elect a new party going against a public vote a few years prior? No of course not because the public has changed its mind. Public opinion changes and at the minute, it’s in favour of a new referendum...

I don’t think that was a viable option then or now. If Parliament rejects the deal on the table, the likely outcome is a referendum on remaining in the EU and leaving (without a deal). Although that’s for the Government and electoral commission to sort out if it came to that. May’s deal is...

Absolutely. But, I get the impression that people think McNulty would’ve walked L1 and be scoring at a similar rate. In preseason, my guess would’ve been between 10-15 or 17 goals. Which is about a strike rate of 1 in 3. Which at this stage would be about 8 goals, Hiwula, JCH and Chaplin are on...

I don’t think anyone has claimed that. McNulty was fantastic for us, and I’m grateful for all the memories. However, that season could just be a flash in the pan and wasn’t guaranteed goals in L1. To put it into perspective, McNulty’s record in L1 is about 1 in 5, which, as I’ve stated...

Funnily enough, I only missed Wycombe. The stats speak for themselves and our strikers are doing just fine. I feel sorry for anyone who genuinely thinks we have a chance of resigning McNulty.

I’d play: Burge Sterling Willis Hyam Mason Thomas Kelly Bayliss Bright Chaplin Hiwula Home game versus a struggling team, we really ought to win, hopefully by 2+ goals. But, it wouldn’t surprise me if we ended up drawing or losing this one.

Irony. You talked about skewed statistics whilst skewing statistics. Labour and Conservative are guaranteed to get about 70% of the vote in every general election since WW2. The 2017 election has nothing to do with the referendum. That's an intellectually lazy and dishonest argument. Besides...

I’m sure people Leave would’ve won the referendum had the electorate known we were headed for a ‘no deal’ Brexit... ... Or May’s deal, which is worst of both worlds, of remaining tied to the EU indefinitely. Without the perks of EU membership, and without the perks of a no deal. That 2%...

If the electorate still wanted to leave the EU, then sure, why not have a choice of what kind of Brexit we wanted.

<insert dictators name> is not a valid political argument.

With another referendum, yes.

How would it be undemocratic if the electorate voted against Brexit in another referendum? It’s not just me, if May’s deal gets rejected about 64% want a second referendum. Seems like it would be undemocratic to just go through with Brexit without a deal. It’s an oxymoron: ‘undemocratic...

A referendum is a form of direct democracy, the purest democracy has to offer. People voted to leave, an elected government has gone away and negotiated a deal and to hold a vote on that deal is about as close to pure democracy as you can get. A referendum cannot be undemocratic in any...

My arguments attenpt to be apolitical because I genuinely think a second referendum is very likely. Where my bias is, however, that I said that from Day 1, to uni friends and close friends.

Fair enough, I’ll go back and edit your name out of the original posts to avoid misrepresenting your view. At least one person proposed it way back in the thread when I originally got involved.

That’s democracy, and public opinion is constantly changing. Referendums, as a rule of thumb, tend to be rare so I imagine it’d be off the table for a while after a final say on the deal. The scenario we find ourself in is exceptional hence the necessity for something as a drastic as another...

This is a paraphrase of one of your posts: ‘I still put it even between leave without a deal,leave accepting the deal and ending up with another referendum.’ This is quite vague and it’s meaning is unclear to me. I’ve interpreted as options for a referendum if the government chose that route...

I wouldn’t be happy with the result, but I’d consider the issue done and dusted either way. Where would the demand be for an immediate third referendum after second one? The issue would be resolved until there was a demand for third. If that was a year, 10, 20, 30+ years then it’s not...

Looks like a handy player. Hopefully a more team orientated version of Nazon too!