Search results

Cmon spill the beans.

Yep, I bet Wolves and Sheff Utd wouldn't be able to cope with the cauldron of noise that is 6k fans at the butts.

<p> Home?

<p> That option disappears with the breaking of the lease.

<p> I just dont understand why someone would wish for an iconic Coventry landmark to be destroyed.

<p> What good would that be to our city? The Ricoh is a wonderful asset, with or without the football club.

Even if the club did own it, having a valuable lease might make the club more valuable, but that would have no impact on what goes on at pitch level. It wouldn't generate any extra income for the club. Sounds like the old hedge fund trick we've seen before in David Bell's ridiculous contract.

The filing accounts is for wimps one made me smile.

Sisu don't know their arse from their elbow. The club will never make money with these clowns in charge.

<p> So of the aims of this gathering, which were not achieved?

Its you. Looking for something that's not there.

Have either of those every changed the structure and soul of the club forever?

What happens with regard to ffp if they cant be sold?

<p> Where has he condoned attacking the team? There is a difference between the club and the team. The team shouldn't get abused online, the club however gets all it deserves.

I would say selling the former home before having a new one in place. Nothing wrong with trying to get a new ground, but they shouldn't have gambled

There is a difference between ideological views and political views. I.e. no party does what their founding principles suggest they should. I would class myself as a right wing capitalist, but only in a regulated capitalist way. Hence I find hedge fund antics as disgusting as the next...

That's because you're an intelligent person who understands that just because we have differing political views, you don't have to automatically disagree with everything I post.

I think we're going to lose more than 4k this year.

Coventry city is heading for its lowest league crowds ever in its history next season. If that doesn't bother Fisher, why would he listen to the trust anyway?

So you wouldn't sacrifice next season in order to sort the club out long term?