Search results

No, too much has gone on. With his new stadium nonsense he has proven to either not care about the club, and/or be too thick to understand what he is doing will worsen the finances. Either points mean he is unsuited to the job imo. I wouldn't mind Waggot staying on though.

Council don't get any revenue streams.

<p> The best thing that could happen is for ccfc to stay in admin. It would scupper fishers plans to move & destroy the club.

This suggests to me that acl think we will still be in admin at the start of the season. It also backs up their argument that the "club" is in administration.

If that's true about ffp rules then why did Swindon get stung this year? Why do all clubs have to submit details of their finances in early December? Im not going to pretend I know my about it than him, but I suspect he is wrong there. My understanding is that from August to December will...

Fisher had said the FL wouldn't let them play at the butts, so I doubt Brandon would meet safety standards.

<p> Its down to Tim Fisher to find somewhere suitable for the fans. The how's and whys are down to him to sort out.

But the customers don't want it. The customers are right.

The most important thing for the business is to make money. 11k ticket sales will make far more money than 3k ticket sales + 500 pie sales. It doesn't matter where the money comes from as long as its coming into the club. A 6 year old could work this one out.

Well done on the Thursday forum for keeping it balanced, controlled, and allowing a decent Q and A session. Unfortunately Fisher wasn't too revealing with his answers but that isn't your fault! Didnt get to hear tonights forum so can't comment on that!

And in actual fact we have been trying to help Sisu. We have told them that if they move we won't follow them. Most businesses don't get that sort of foresight, if they ignore the wishes of their customers in this way they deserve to lose the lot.

Did you manage to find out if the ACL bid is in conjunction with another party or just them on their own?

Exactly. It would just be a means of reuniting the club and the stadium and being able to sell it on.

I know little about it. As I understand it a CVA is when over 75% of creditors agree to the administrators proposal. When 75% of creditors don't agree to it the Administrator has to force through the sale of the club. Something that would result in a further points deduction.

Unfortunately I think your right. The time is nearly here when we have to say goodbye to our beloved Sky Blues forever.

Were talking 30 miles.

Its only an advantage to Sisu if all of Rugby Boro and Warwickshire council officials have been sitting in a cave on the Moon with their eyes closed for the last 10 years. Coventry council & Warwickshire council are very closely linked, and remember the Ricoh cost Warwickshire money as well to...

Agree to what? ACL buying Ltd? That isn't down to Holdings/Sisu to agree to, its up to the administrator.