Search results

I can understand that you can spot duplicate accounts, but how could you tell who they are? How would TF or AL setting up duplicate accounts appear any differently to me doing it? (not that I have of course!)

I agree, even Fisher and Lucas are entitled to their opinion. If they come onto here and portray things from their own point of view, or even lied, it is up to us as individuals if we believe them or not. I still maintain though how can we know someone has a vested interest when they are...

Of course it is right to point out that it is only a tiny minority of people that are idiots at football matches, but unfortunately that's all it takes. I seen it nearly kick off once because some chav at the back of the telegraph stand kept using the C word. A perfectly decent bloke in front...

Because its not such a passionate sport, and there's less chavs.

No. Its the actions of a few idiots who ruin it for the rest of us that are to blame for that.

If their anonymous how do you know they have a vested interest?

I never considered SBT a laughing stock before. However you claiming to be balanced is without doubt the funniest thing I have read in ages!

Fisher was on the board from the December before we went down (i.e. before the January transfer window) and was in charge by around the March/April time. What your saying is he is basically a yes man. Someone who is afraid to advise the owner that they are making a mistake, someone who refuses...

Who exactly are you to decide what defines a "real" fan.

Its not in Fishers interest for the club to be sold. No new owners would ever keep the fool on, and he would never get a job elsewhere. Imagine his interview? "OK Tim, what are your achievements at Ccfc?" "Well I oversaw a relegation, a liquidation, ensured the club had no long term...

It does seem as though Les Reid has an issue with those who have a different opinion to himself. Not a good trait for a journo.

There's 96 reasons it was a good idea.

I'm knocking sisu for putting absolutely no effort or imagination in even trying to improve the matchday experience. They don't even try and increase revenues through imaginative ways.

Why does it matter what other football clubs do? We're Coventry City. The football club that pioneered all seater stadiums, shirt sponsorship, pre match and half time entertainment, official travel to away matches. We did all those things without any prompt from top division football teams.

Support is there for the city's own team. Football fans can't be trusted with alcohol unfortunately.

The Coventry public is no different to the rest of the country. Let's not pretend otherwise. Were not unique.

IMO the most likely scenario would be a slap on the wrist for CCC, but Sisu use the judgement to seek for damages, and claim compensation from the council. They would then take the money and dispose (possibly liquidation) of CCFC.

How would I know that? Freebies are good anyway. It just means the club is trying to integrate itself into the local community.

So what evidence is there that this isn't the same at all top flight rugby matches?

The average Premiership Rugby match gets a crowd of just 13k. There is no evidence to suggest Wasps aren't capable of maintaining at least 13k indefinitely, and even less evidence to suggest they cant manage on that.