Search results

You are guessing there though aren't you?

And the third is..?

Yes...wasn't it the case that Parliamentary expenses were monitored & regulated etc? I do hope the authorities/parties involved do not wonder why any of the general public are ever anything other than sceptical about such things, given their historic cynical manipulation of almost everything.

But it might in fact be quite straightforward & clear-cut & his hardest job has been done. All he now may need to do is report his findings back. The findings may be quite damning...or may not be. We still won't know until 16th May. Anything else is guessing &/or speculation &/or rumour &/or...

Dunno about that Nick...he certainly looked a cool, classy boxer though.

Surely the it is entirely possible that the administrator has all the evidence & answers at his fingertips by now. The reporting of any answers he does have & questions still unanswered will not be disclosed until 16 May in court though, will they?

I think stewarding is all about mindset. Too many seem to think most attending the event are a problem, especially after any boisterous behaviour. What the role seems to attract are "would-be" police. It's an opportunity to bully or exercise some power over others in supposedly legitimate...

Stop putting yourself down or we'll get that crane out ;-)

Thought we had CCTV to watch out for people such as yourself who cause trouble (allegedly) at football...so if you ARE a trouble-maker they SHOULD have you on CCTV - if not, they won't. Appeal on that basis...the steward(s) concerned must have some idea of the time this began to build into an...

We can only hope..!

Someone else's myth IMO

Those teams play to their striker's strengths. We did too when we had a potent scorer (Clarke or McG). The replacement strikers don't have particular strengths, our season is over, ours & our player's future is uncertain, a new manager with adjusted tactics & style...how many more reasons do you...

You certainly wouldn't make it as a literary genius.

Did you see something everyone else's missed?

The administrator reports back to court 16th May. Nothing will happen before that date...& probably not a lot straight away after that either.

That's the thing. Initial deduction deters owners from administration. Nobody sets out to fail. Although the further deduction for coming out of admin does seem to set the new owners up to fail! All revenue stream for the business in admin are now under the administrator's control...not SISUs...

As the rules are not actual law - I see no way that the leagues can simply take money from individuals concerned. Fining TF for example...they have no power over him now really as I see it - he could simply walk away & not care (unless something in corporate law prevents this? although the same...

Yeah I get that...but it just seems bizarre to me. Cant think of a good eg but seems a bit like an interviewer asking a film stars agent about the camera used in his latest film.

What's the pitch got to do with the trust?

Stalking is a criminal offence you know?