Search results

I think I may just have to rob that picture!

We can all sit and be keyboard warriors about who is to blame CCC or SISU, but the football league are a big culprit in all of this. If it wasn't for their poor management of the situation then there would not be anything to debate about with regards to CCC or SISU! In light of recent documents...

It doesn't surprise me that Tim has been lying ....... again. The only thing that does concern me is that all of these documents are dated pre 2010. I dont know the full ins and outs of this BUT i do believe that if the players were transferred to Holdings within a reasonable time before there...

One of the reasons Tim gave for not accepting the offer apart from it being outside the CVA was that because of the contract with northampton now done it would cost too much to back out. Also at the last CVA meeting (I think it was then dont quote me) it was mentioned that Joy attended with her...

The offer was made. I remember the whole reason the CVA was postponed a further couple of days was because of the offer. Now if it was not made outside of the CVA then why have SISU used this as an excuse to not pursue it? Why have they just written it off as "oh well it wasnt offered outside...

Do you listen to yourself? you say he has no evidence then you use it yourself as evidence?? Fair enough - Appleton said - Legally the £150,000 could not be made as part of the CVA process BUT why could it not have been dealt with outside of this? How is it that CCFC Holdings which did not...

Whether it be a 6 million lease ....... a 40 million lease ..... or a 1 billion fafillion lease. It is still a lease which they wanted to protect, for themselves and for the people of coventry to keep their football club in their city. Therefore what is your argument? All you ever argue is that...

Schmee is talking A LOT of sense. It was offered to CCFC Ltd. which was in the process of being sold to Otium. So yes it was offered to them. Tell me I am wrong? The football League have got away with a lot from this. It is ultimately their fault that SISU have been allowed to fiddle with...

Ironic how you claim that everyone else is factually inaccurate ........

I don't think you quite got the point of what I was saying .....

Where are the anti-council to answer all these questions??? Have you got nothing? Anything from Mr Grendel??

Im fed up of these fools using the website as propaganda. The fact that they put it on the website as "Deadline Day round up" made me giggle like a school girl.

They didnt sell any of our players? Wow I am shocked. SISU must have been telling the truth all along. Maybe they DO care. Maybe they can turn it all around. Maybe its "90%" of the fans that are in fact the ones who have it all wrong. SAID NO ONE ........ EVER

You haven't really answered any of my points properly at all have you.

1. What is the point in meeting Nikki Sinclaire? 2. What was discussed that was of importance in the meeting Nikki and Joy shared? 3. She offered to meet Joy before. Nothing came of it. 4. There has been an appeal of the JR decision. Why SHOULD there be a meeting when this is going on? 5...

If it was factually inaccurate maybe you could correct me? I am yet to read something of value that you have posted but Im all for change. The only thing which is factually inaccurate - which I have admitted to - Is the £1.3mill in arrears. Yet nobody knows the real figure anyway ........ In...

Players under a certain age (cant remember maybe 21 or 23) do not come in to play for FFP.

Has none of the anti-council got an answer for the above?

I want to set this thread on fire

...... but they still owe money ........ what do you believe the figure to be then? I have used £1.3 million loosely but I know that is not the real figure.