Search results

Happy Birthday Wingy - or as happy as it can be given the circumstances!

If CCFC Ltd (as opposed to CCFC Holdings Ltd) did not emerge from administration, would that wipe out the club's history and record in the eyes of the authorities?

What's the betting this subsidiary is the one that has the rental agreement with ACL and which owes it £1.3m. Bingo - rental agreement broken and debt cleared. If so, which pitch would we play on then?

Hold tight. It's probably going to be a bumpy ride...

I wonder if it is a cunning plan? One that is as cunning as a fox that used to be Professor of Cunning at Oxford University but has moved on and is now working for the UN at the High Commission of International Cunning Planning?

Tim Fisher told the Guardian: "We are at a tipping point and insolvent liquidation cannot be reasonably avoided. They [ACL] need to re-enter negotiations pronto or we file. We'll have no option because there would not be reasonable probability of avoiding insolvency liquidation." His words...

CCFC were put on this path by Sisu not paying the rent. Without the debt ACL would not take action. You could also start the path earlier, with the contract for the Arena or selling Highfield Road.

FENTON!!! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3GRSbr0EYYU

In my opinion things were going awry even before the Arena project. Remember what Richardson told Rick Gekoski (as reported by Gekoski in his book "Staying Up") after we survived the drop in 1997: "We’re having a bit of a punt here. We’re £20million in debt and the effects of relegation would...

If there is any truth to this rumour it could make for an interesting battle: A man with the cojones to do serious business in Russia v a woman with "balls of steel"...

CCFC existed before Sisu. CCFC will exist in the heart of the fans - and maybe or maybe not as a corporate entity - after Sisu. Whether you intended it or not, putting CCFC (Sisu) leaves room for doubt. I think we all want the best for CCFC, but there are differing opinions about what the best...

That was the impression I got too; that he wanted to get this nugget of information out into the public domain.

Didn't PWKH tell us the other week that Ricoh would not pull out?

Aye, I was suggesting Adams was someone we should look at after we sacked Thorn.

So CCFC, if it was paying the rent, would be contributing about 17% of turnover. But, by my quick calculations of these figures, that money would also only cover 19.4% of the costs of running the stadium. While I am glad ACL is healthy enough to be able to offer a two-thirds reduction in that...

Stupid suggestion - that name would never fit on the shirt. :facepalm:

Gets confusing doesn't it? Would we support CCFC (part of New CCFC Company Ltd) or CCFC Holdings (part of Sky Blue Entertainment Ventures Ltd, which is part of Sky Blues Sports and Leisure etc)? :confused:

For the sake of argument, if a third party did appear, offered the IP a better deal and it is accepted, does that mean they buy CCFC? If so, which company is then the real CCFC? The now third-party owned CCFC or the Sisu owned CCFC Holdings?

Anyone want to lay bets on Thursday being the day we find out?

There's a piece on the Beeb today about how Swansea are already scouting out their next manager in preparation for the day Laudrup leaves. Huw Jenkins is quoted saying "We wouldn't be doing our job if we didn't have some idea of who... will suit Swansea City." In fairness to Waggott, Swansea...